Contents

Contents

In computer science, originally in database theory?, lenses are used in situations where some structure is converted to a different form – a view – in such a way that changes made to the view can be reflected as updates to the original structure. The same construction has been devised on numerous occasions (Hedges).

Definition

Let $C$ be a category with finite products. A lens in C denoted $L =(S,V,g,p)$ has states $S$ and view states $V$ which are objects of $C$, and two arrows of C, a Get arrow $g:S \to V$ and a Put arrow $p:V \times S \to S$, often taken to satisfy the following equations, or lens laws:

1. (PutGet) the Get of a Put is the projection: $g p= \pi_0$.
2. (GetPut) the Put for a trivially updated state is trivial: $p \langle g, 1_S \rangle = 1_S$.
3. (PutPut) composing Puts does not depend on the first view update: $p(1_V \times p) = p \pi_{0,2}$.

Sometimes a lens satisfying all three laws is said to be lawful. Sometimes it is said that a well-behaved lens satisfies (1) and (2) and a very well-behaved lens satisfies also (3).

In other words, a (lawful) lens for a fixed $V$ is an algebra from the monad $V^{\ast} \cdot \Sigma$ (the possibility operator):

$C/V \underoverset {\underset{V^{\ast}}{\longleftarrow}} {\overset{\Sigma}{\longrightarrow}} {\bot} C.$

They are also coalgebras for the store comonad.

Generalizations

Many kinds of generalization have been proposed - asymmetric lenses, bimorphic lens, etc.

One generalization considers the lenses from the previous section as monomorphic by contrast to polymorphic lens which go between pairs of types, $\lambda: (S, T) \to (A, B)$, consisting of a view function, $v_{\lambda}: S \to A$, and an update function $u_{\lambda}: S \times B \to T$. Without further conditions, these are known as bimorphic lenses. To impose conditions comparable to the lens laws above requires that the types be related.

An optic defines a symmetric monoidal functor from SymmMonCat to itself. Evaluating the result for different symmetric monoidal categories gives these various generalizations such as Prisms which use the disjoint union in Set. (Riley Theorem 2.0.8)

References

• Bohannon, A., Vaughan, J. and Pierce, B. (2006) Relational Lenses: A language for updatable views. Proceedings of Principles of Database Systems (PODS) 2006

• Foster, J., Greenwald, M., Moore, J., Pierce, B. and Schmitt, A. (2007) Combinators for bidirectional tree transformations: A linguistic approach to the view update problem. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 29

• Michael Johnson, Robert Rosebrugh, and R. J. Wood. Lenses, fibrations and universal translations. Math. Structures Comput. Sci., 22(1):25–42, 2012

• Jeremy Gibbons, Lenses are the coalgebras for the costate comonad

• Jules Hedges, Lenses for philosophers, blog post

• Mitchell Riley?, Categories of optics, (arXiv:1809.00738)

• David Spivak, Lenses: applications and generalizations, slides of talk at ACT 19.

Last revised on January 23, 2020 at 08:36:13. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.