nLab unitarization

Contents

Idea

In representation theory, unitarization refers to isomorphisms from a given linear representation on a Hermitian inner product space (Hilbert space) to that underlying a unitary representation.

Properties

Existence for compact groups

For GG a compact topological group then every linear representation ρ:GAut()\rho \,\colon\,G \to Aut(\mathscr{H}) on a (complex separable) Hilbert space may be unitarized by re-defining the inner product of \mathscr{H} to be the “group averaging” of the original one, given by the integral

(1)v,w new gGρ(g)(v),ρ(g)(w) olddg \langle v, w \rangle_{new} \;\coloneqq\; \int_{g \in G} \big\langle \rho(g)(v) ,\, \rho(g)(w) \big\rangle_{old} \, \mathrm{d}g

against the Haar measure on GG.

(cf. Knapp 1996, Prop. 4.6)

Remark

(Terminology) Some authors refer to (1) as Weyl’s unitarian trick or similar, cf. Gomez 2009 p 5. But the original “unitarian trick” of Weyl 1939 pp 137 (cf. Knapp96, Prop. 7.15) is really referring to a another construction which just uses the above unitarization as an intermediate step (cf. Knapp96, p 445).

Example

In the case that GG is a finite group, formula (1) reduces to the sum

v,w new1|G| gGρ(g)(v),ρ(g)(w) old, \langle v, w \rangle_{new} \;\coloneqq\; \tfrac{1}{{\vert G \vert}} \sum_{g \in G} \big\langle \rho(g)(v) ,\, \rho(g)(w) \big\rangle_{old} \,,

and it is elementary to see that this new inner product is indeed preserved:

ρ(h)(v),ρ(h)(w) new =1|G| gGρ(h)(ρ(g)(v)),ρ(h)(ρ(g)(w)) old =1|G| gGρ(hg)(v),ρ(hg)(w) old =1|G| gGρ(g)(v),ρ(g)(w) old =1|G|ρ(h)(v),ρ(h)(w) new. \begin{array}{l} \big\langle \rho(h)(v) ,\, \rho(h)(w) \big\rangle_{new} \\ \;=\; \tfrac{1}{{\vert G \vert}} \, \sum_{g \in G} \Big\langle \rho(h)\big(\rho(g)(v)\big) ,\, \rho(h)\big(\rho(g)(w)\big) \Big\rangle_{old} \\ \;=\; \tfrac{1}{{\vert G \vert}} \, \sum_{g \in G} \big\langle \rho(h g)(v) ,\, \rho(h g)(w) \big\rangle_{old} \\ \;=\; \tfrac{1}{{\vert G \vert}} \, \sum_{g' \in G} \big\langle \rho(g')(v) ,\, \rho(g')(w) \big\rangle_{old} \\ \;=\; \tfrac{1}{{\vert G \vert}} \, \big\langle \rho(h)(v) ,\, \rho(h)(w) \big\rangle_{new} \mathrlap{\,.} \end{array}

Existence for locally compact amenable groups

Provided that one assumes enough choice to ensure weak-star compactness in the unit ball B()B(\mathscr{H}) (for \mathscr{H} the representing Hilbert space): every bounded strong-operator-continuous representation of a locally compact amenable group on a Hilbert space \mathscr{H} is unitarizable. See the Wikipedia page for Uniformly bounded representation [version: 2025-12-08] for some of the historical references.

References

The terminology “unitarian trick” goes back to:

  • Hermann Weyl: The Classical Groups – Their Invariants and Representations, Princeton University Press (1939) [jstor:j.ctv3hh48t, pdf, Wikipedia entry]

    “We therefore take refuge in what might be called the unitarian trick: each group is replaced by the subgroup of those elements that are unitary transformations.”

Textbook account:

Lecture notes:

  • Raul Gomez, p 5 of: Introduction to Representation Theory of Lie groups (2009) [pdf]

See also:

Last revised on February 10, 2025 at 04:19:00. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.