With braiding
With duals for objects
category with duals (list of them)
dualizable object (what they have)
ribbon category, a.k.a. tortile category
With duals for morphisms
monoidal dagger-category?
With traces
Closed structure
Special sorts of products
Semisimplicity
Morphisms
Internal monoids
Examples
Theorems
In higher category theory
The tensor product of modules.
Let be a commutative ring and consider the multicategory Mod of -modules and -multilinear maps. In this case the tensor product of modules of -modules and can be constructed as the quotient of the tensor product of abelian groups underlying them by the action of ; that is,
More category-theoretically:
If the ring happens to be a field, then -modules are vector spaces and the tensor product of -modules becomes the tensor product of vector spaces.
This tensor product can be generalized to the case when is not commutative, as long as is a right -module and is a left -module. More generally yet, if is a monoid in any monoidal category (a ring being a monoid in Ab with its tensor product), we can define the tensor product of a left and a right -module in an analogous way. If is a commutative monoid in a symmetric monoidal category, so that left and right -modules coincide, then is again an -module, while if is not commutative then will no longer be an -module of any sort.
The tensor product of modules can be generalized to the tensor product of functors.
The category Mod equipped with the tensor product of modules becomes a monoidal category, in fact a distributive monoidal category.
The tensor product of modules distributes over the direct sum of modules:
Let be a commutative ring.
For a module, the functor of tensoring with this module
is an additve right exact functor.
The functor is additive by the distributivity of tensor products over direct sums, prop. .
A general abstract way of seeing that the functor is right exact is to notice that is a left adjoint functor, its right adjoint being the internal hom (see at Mod). By the discussion at adjoint functor this means that even preserves all colimits, in particular the finite colimits.
The functor is not a left exact functor (hence not an exact functor) for all choices of and .
Let , hence Ab and let the cyclic group or order 2. Moreover, consider the inclusion sitting in the short exact sequence
The functor sends this to
Here the morphism on the left is the 0-morphism: in components it is given for all by
Hence this is not a short exact sequence anymore.
One kind of module for which is always exact are free modules.
Let be an inclusion of a submodule. For Set write for the free module on . Then
is again a monomorphism. Indeed, due to the distributivity of the tensor product over the direct sum and using that is the tensor unit, this is
There are more modules than the free ones for which is exact. One says
If is such that is a left exact functor (hence an exact functor), is called a flat module.
For a general module, a measure of the failure of to be exact is given by the Tor-functor . See there for more details.
Textbook accounts:
Frank W. Anderson, Kent R. Fuller, §19 in: Rings and Categories of Modules, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 13 Springer (1992) [doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4418-9]
Paul Edwin Bland, §2.3 in: Rings and Their Modules, De Gruyter (2011) [doi:10.1515/9783110250237, pdf]
Lecture notes:
See also:
Last revised on August 25, 2023 at 08:52:21. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.