nLab
tensor product of chain complexes

Contents

Context

Homological algebra

homological algebra

(also nonabelian homological algebra)

Introduction

Context

Basic definitions

Stable homotopy theory notions

Constructions

Lemmas

diagram chasing

Homology theories

Theorems

Monoidal categories

monoidal categories

With symmetry

With duals for objects

With duals for morphisms

With traces

Closed structure

Special sorts of products

Semisimplicity

Morphisms

Internal monoids

Examples

Theorems

In higher category theory

Contents

Idea

A natural tensor product of chain complexes that makes the category of chain complexes into a closed monoidal category.

Definition

Let RR be a commutative ring and 𝒜=R\mathcal{A} = RMod the category of modules over RR. Write Ch (𝒜)Ch_\bullet(\mathcal{A}) for the category of chain complexes of RR-modules.

Definition

For X,YCh (𝒜)X, Y \in Ch_\bullet(\mathcal{A}) write (XY) Ch (𝒜)(X \otimes Y)_\bullet \in Ch_\bullet(\mathcal{A}) for the chain complex whose component in degree nn is given by the direct sum

(XY) n:= i+j=nX i RY j (X \otimes Y)_n := \oplus_{i + j = n} X_i \otimes_R Y_j

over all tensor products of components whose degrees sum to nn, and whose differential is given on elements (x,y)(x,y) of homogeneous degree by

XY(x,y)=( Xx,y)+(1) deg(x)(x, Yy). \partial^{X \otimes Y} (x, y) = (\partial^X x, y) + (-1)^{deg(x)} (x, \partial^Y y) \,.

Properties

As a total complex of a double complex

The tensor product of chain complexes is equivalently the total complex of the double complex which is the objectwise tensor product:

Definition

For X,YCh (𝒜)X, Y \in Ch_\bullet(\mathcal{A}) write X Y Ch (Ch (𝒜))X_\bullet \otimes Y_\bullet \in Ch_\bullet(Ch_\bullet(\mathcal{A})) for the double complex whose component in degree (n 1,n 2)(n_1, n_2) is given by the tensor product

X n 1Y n 2𝒜 X_{n_1} \otimes Y_{n_2} \in \mathcal{A}

whose horizontal differential is hor Xid Y\partial^{hor} \coloneqq \partial^X \otimes id_Y and whose vertical differential is vertid X Y\partial^{vert} \coloneqq id_{X} \otimes \partial^Y.

Proposition

The tensor product of chain complexes, def. is isomorphic to the total complex of the double complex of def. :

Tot (X Y )(XY) . Tot_\bullet (X_\bullet \otimes Y_\bullet) \simeq (X \otimes Y)_\bullet \,.
Proof

By direct unwinding of the definitions.

As Day convolution

The following section is copied form an answer by Alexander Campbell on MathOverflow.

The tensor product of chain complexes is a Day convolution product. The important thing to note is that, to define a Day convolution monoidal structure on the 𝒱\mathcal{V}-enriched functor category [𝒞,𝒱][\mathcal{C},\mathcal{V}] (where 𝒱\mathcal{V} is a complete and cocomplete symmetric monoidal closed category, e.g. Ab\mathbf{Ab}), we needn’t demand 𝒞\mathcal{C} to be a monoidal 𝒱\mathcal{V}-category: it suffices for 𝒞\mathcal{C} to be a promonoidal? 𝒱\mathcal{V}-category. This is the generality at which Day convolution was originally defined in Day’s thesis (see also his earlier paper in the Reports of the Midwest Category Seminar IV, where the word “premonoidal” was used).

A promonoidal structure on a small 𝒱\mathcal{V}-category 𝒞\mathcal{C} consists of tensor product and unit “profunctors”, i.e. 𝒱\mathcal{V}-functors P:𝒞 op×𝒞 op×𝒞𝒱P \colon \mathcal{C}^\mathrm{op}\times\mathcal{C}^\mathrm{op} \times \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{V} and J:𝒞𝒱J \colon \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{V}, together with associativity and unit constraints subject to the usual two “pentagon” and “triangle” axioms. Given a promonoidal structure on 𝒞\mathcal{C}, we may construct the Day convolution monoidal structure on [𝒞,𝒱][\mathcal{C},\mathcal{V}], whose tensor product is given at a pair of 𝒱\mathcal{V}-functors F,G[𝒞,𝒱]F,G \in [\mathcal{C},\mathcal{V}] by the coend

F*G= A,B𝒞P(A,B;)FAGBF\ast G = \int^{A,B \in \mathcal{C}} P(A,B;-) \otimes FA \otimes GB

in 𝒱\mathcal{V}, and whose unit object is the 𝒱\mathcal{V}-functor J[𝒞,𝒱]J \in [\mathcal{C},\mathcal{V}], and so on. This monoidal structure on [𝒞,𝒱][\mathcal{C},\mathcal{V}] is biclosed (i.e., the tensor product 𝒱\mathcal{V}-functor has a right 𝒱\mathcal{V}-adjoint – equivalently, preserves (weighted) colimits – in each variable). In fact, every biclosed monoidal structure? on [𝒞,𝒱][\mathcal{C},\mathcal{V}] arises in this way from some promonoidal structure on 𝒞\mathcal{C}. (For instance, one recovers the 𝒱\mathcal{V}-functor PP from the tensor product *\ast by P(A,B;C)=(𝒞(A,)*𝒞(B,))CP(A,B;C) = (\mathcal{C}(A,-) \ast \mathcal{C}(B,-))C.)

So, since the Ab\mathbf{Ab}-category Ch\mathbf{Ch} of chain complexes is (equivalent to) an Ab\mathbf{Ab}-enriched functor category [𝒞,Ab][\mathcal{C},\mathbf{Ab}] (for the Ab\mathbf{Ab}-category 𝒞\mathcal{C} described in the question to which you linked), and since the standard monoidal structure on Ch\mathbf{Ch} is Ab\mathbf{Ab}-enriched and biclosed, this monoidal structure must be the Day convolution monoidal structure for some promonoidal? structure on 𝒞\mathcal{C}. And it isn’t too hard to describe that promonoidal? structure. For instance, (presuming I haven’t bungled the calculation) the functor PP is defined on objects by

P(i,j;k)={ ifi+j=k, ifi+j=k+1, ifi+j=k+2, 0 else. P(i,j;k) = \begin{cases} \mathbb{Z} & \mathrm{if } \, i+j=k, \\ \mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z} & \mathrm{if } \, i+j=k+1, \\ \mathbb{Z} & \mathrm{if } \, i+j=k+2, \\ 0 & \mathrm{else}. \end{cases}

Examples

Square as tensor product of interval with itself

Example

For RR some ring, let I Ch (RMod)I_\bullet \in Ch_\bullet(R Mod) be the chain complex given by

I =[00R 0 IRR], I_\bullet = \left[ \cdots \to 0 \to 0 \to R \stackrel{\partial^{I}_0}{\to} R \oplus R \right] \,,

where 0 I=(id,id)\partial^I_0 = (-id, id).

This is the normalized chain complex of the simplicial chain complex of the standard simplicial interval, the 1-simplex Δ 1\Delta_1, as follows: we may think of

I 0=RRR[{(0),(1)}] I_0 = R \oplus R \simeq R[ \{(0), (1)\} ]

as the RR-linear span of two basis elements labelled “(0)(0)” and “(1)(1)”, to be thought of as the two 0-chains on the endpoints of the interval. Similarly we may think of

I 1=RR[{(01)}] I_1 = R \simeq R[\{(0 \to 1)\}]

as the free RR-module on the single basis element which is the unique non-degenerate 1-simplex (01)(0 \to 1) in Δ 1\Delta^1.

Accordingly, the differential 0 I\partial^I_0 is the oriented boundary map of the interval, taking this basis element to

0 I:(01)(1)(0) \partial^I_0 : (0 \to 1) \mapsto (1) - (0)

and hence a general element r(01)r\cdot(0 \to 1) for some rRr \in R to

0 I:r(01)r(1)r(0). \partial^I_0 : r\cdot(0 \to 1) \mapsto r\cdot (1) - r\cdot(0) \,.

We now write out in full details the tensor product of chain complexes of I I_\bullet with itself, according to def. :

S I I . S_\bullet \coloneqq I_\bullet \otimes I_\bullet \,.

By definition and using the above choice of basis element, this is in low degree given as follows:

S 0 =I 0I 0 =(RR)(RR) RRRR ={r 00((0),(0))+r 01((0),(1))+r 10((1),(0))+r 11((1),(1))|r ,R}, \begin{aligned} S_0 &= I_0 \otimes I_0 \\ & = (R \oplus R) \otimes (R \oplus R) \\ & \simeq R \oplus R \oplus R \oplus R \\ & = \left\{ r_{00} \cdot ((0),(0)') + r_{01} \cdot ((0),(1)') + r_{10} \cdot ((1),(0)') + r_{11} \cdot ((1),(1)') | r_{\cdot, \cdot} \in R \right\} \end{aligned} \,,

where in the last line we express a general element as a linear combination of the canonical basis elements which are obtained as tensor products (a,b)RR(a,b) \in R\otimes R of the previous basis elements. Notice that by the definition of tensor product of modules we have relations like

r((0),(1))=(r(0),(1))=((0),r(1)) r ( (0), (1)') = (r(0), (1)') = ((0), r(1)')

etc.

Similarly then, in degree-1 the tensor product chain complex is

(II) 1 =(I 0I 1)(I 1I 0) R(RR)(RR)R RRRR {r 0((0),(01))+r 1((1),(01))+r¯ 0((01),(0))+r¯ 1((01),(1))|r ,r¯ R}. \begin{aligned} (I \otimes I)_1 & = (I_0 \otimes I_1) \oplus (I_1 \otimes I_0) \\ & \simeq R \otimes (R \oplus R) \oplus (R \oplus R) \otimes R \\ & \simeq R \oplus R \oplus R \oplus R \\ & \simeq \left\{ r_{0} \cdot ((0),(0\to 1)') + r_{1} \cdot ((1), (0 \to 1)') + \bar r_0 \cdot ((0\to 1), (0)') + \bar r_1 \cdot ((0 \to 1), (1)') | r_{\cdot}, \bar r_{\cdot} \in R \right\} \end{aligned} \,.

And finally in degree 2 it is

(II) 2 I 1I 1 RR R {r((01),(01))|rR}. \begin{aligned} (I \otimes I)_2 & \simeq I_1 \otimes I_1 \\ & \simeq R \otimes R \\ & \simeq R \\ & \simeq \left\{ r\cdot ((0 \to 1), (0 \to 1)') | r \in R \right\} \end{aligned} \,.

All other contributions that are potentially present in (II) (I \otimes I)_\bullet vanish (are the 0-module) because all higher terms in I I_\bullet are.

The tensor product basis elements appearing in the above expressions have a clear geometric interpretation: we can label a square with them as follows

((0),(1)) ((01),(0)) ((1),(1)) ((0),(01)) ((01),(01)) ((1),(01)) ((0),(0)) ((01),(0)) ((1),(0)). \array{ ((0),(1)') &&\underset{((0\to 1),(0))}{\to}&& ((1),(1)') \\ \\ {}^{\mathllap{((0),(0\to 1)')}}\uparrow &&\righttoleftarrow^{((0 \to 1), (0\to 1)')}&& \uparrow^{\mathrlap{((1),(0 \to 1)')}} \\ \\ ((0),(0)') &&\underset{((0\to 1),(0)')}{\to}&& ((1),(0)') } \,.

This diagram indicates a cellular square and identifies its canonical singular chains with the elements of (II) (I \otimes I)_\bullet. The arrows indicate the orientation. For instance the fact that

II((01),(0)) =( I(01),(0))+(1) 1((01), I(0)) =((1)(0),(0))0 =((1),(0))((0),(0)) \begin{aligned} \partial^{I \otimes I} ((0 \to 1), (0)') & = (\partial^I (0 \to 1), (0)') + (-1)^1 ((0\to 1), \partial^I (0)) \\ & = ( (1) - (0), \;(0)' ) - 0 \\ & = ((1), (0)') - ((0), (0)') \end{aligned}

says that the oriented boundary of the bottom morphism is the bottom right element (its target) minus the bottom left element (its source), as indicated. Here we used that the differential of a degree-0 element in I I_\bullet is 0, and hence so is any tensor product with it.

Similarly the oriented boundary of the square itself is computed to

II((01),(01)) =( I(01),(01))((01), I(01)) =((1)(0),(01))((01),(1)(0)) =((1),(01))((0),(01))((01),(1))+((01),(0)), \begin{aligned} \partial^{I \otimes I} ((0 \to 1), (0 \to 1)') &= (\partial^I (0 \to 1), (0 \to 1)') - ((0 \to 1), \partial^I(0 \to 1)) \\ & = ((1)- (0), (0 \to 1)') - ((0 \to 1), (1)' - (0)') \\ & = ((1), (0 \to 1)') - ((0), (0 \to 1)') - ((0 \to 1), (1)') + ((0 \to 1), (0)') \end{aligned} \,,

which can be read as saying that the boundary is the evident boundary thought of as oriented by drawing it counterclockwise into the plane, so that the right arrow (which points up) contributes with a +1 prefactor, while the left arrow (which also points up) contributes with a -1 prefactor.

Singular chain complex

For X,YX,Y \in Top two topological spaces, the Eilenberg-Zilber theorem asserts a quasi-isomorphism

C (X×Y)(C(X)C(Y)) C_\bullet(X \times Y) \to (C(X) \otimes C(Y))_\bullet

between the singular chain complex of the product topological space and the tensor product of chain complexes of the separate singular chain complexes.

Filtering and spectral sequences

As for any total complex of a double complex, the tensor product of chain complexes is naturally a filtered chain complex, either by the degree of the first of by that of the second chain complex factor.

Proposition

Let RR be a commutative ring. For A,BRA, B \in RMod, the two ways of computing the Tor left derived functor coincide

(L n(() RB))(A)(L n(A R()))(B) (L_n ((-)\otimes_R B))(A) \simeq (L_n (A \otimes_R (-)))(B)

and hence we can consistently write Tor n(A,B)Tor_n(A,B) for either.

Proof

Let Q A qiAQ^A_\bullet \stackrel{\simeq_{qi}}{\to} A and Q B qiBQ^B_\bullet \stackrel{\simeq_{qi}}{\to} B be projective resolutions of AA and BB, respectively. The corresponding tensor product of chain complexes Tot(Q AQ B)Tot (Q^A_\bullet\otimes Q^B_\bullet), hence by prop. the total complex of the degreewise tensor product of modules double complex carries the filtration by horizontal degree as well as that by vertical degree.

Accordingly there are the corresponding two spectral sequences of a double complex, to be denoted here { AE p,q r} r,p,q\{{}^{A}E^r_{p,q}\}_{r,p,q} (for the filtering by AA-degree) and { BE p,q r} r,p,q\{{}^{B}E^r_{p,q}\}_{r,p,q} (for the filtering by BB-degree). By the discussion there, both converge to the chain homology of the total complex.

We find the value of both spectral sequences on low degree pages according to the general discussion at spectral sequence of a double complex - low degree pages.

The 0th page for both is

AE p,q 0= BE p,q 0Q p A RQ q B. {}^A E^0_{p,q} = {}^B E^0_{p,q} \coloneqq Q^A_p \otimes_R Q^B_q \,.

For the first page we have

AE p,q 1 H q(C p,) H q(Q p AQ B) \begin{aligned} {}^A E^1_{p,q} & \simeq H_q(C_{p,\bullet}) \\ & \simeq H_q( Q^A_p \otimes Q^B_\bullet ) \end{aligned}

and

BE p,q 1 H q(C ,p) H q(Q AQ p B). \begin{aligned} {}^B E^1_{p,q} & \simeq H_q(C_{\bullet,p}) \\ & \simeq H_q( Q^A_\bullet \otimes Q^B_p ) \end{aligned} \,.

Now using the universal coefficient theorem in homology and the fact that Q AQ^A_\bullet and Q BQ^B_\bullet is a resolution by projective objects, by construction, hence of tensor acyclic objects for which all Tor-modules vanish, this simplifies to

AE p,q 1 Q p AH q(Q B) {Q p A RB ifq=0 0 otherwise \begin{aligned} {}^A E^1_{p,q} & \simeq Q^A_p \otimes H_q(Q^B_\bullet) \\ & \simeq \left\{ \array{ Q^A_p \otimes_R B & if\; q = 0 \\ 0 & otherwise } \right. \end{aligned}

and similarly

BE p,q 1 H q(Q A) RQ p B {A RQ p B ifq=0 0 otherwise. \begin{aligned} {}^B E^1_{p,q} & \simeq H_q(Q^A_\bullet) \otimes_R Q^B_p \\ & \simeq \left\{ \array{ A \otimes_R Q^B_p & if\; q = 0 \\ 0 & otherwise } \right. \end{aligned} \,.

It follows for the second pages that

AE p,q 2 H p(H q vert(Q AQ B)) {(L p(() RB))(A) ifq=0 0 otherwise \begin{aligned} {}^A E^2_{p,q} & \simeq H_p(H^{vert}_q(Q^A_\bullet \otimes Q^B_\bullet)) \\ & \simeq \left\{ \array{ (L_p( (-)\otimes_R B ))(A) & if \; q = 0 \\ 0 & otherwise } \right. \end{aligned}

and

BE p,q 2 H p(H q hor(Q AQ B)) {(L p(A R()))(B) ifq=0 0otherwise. \begin{aligned} {}^B E^2_{p,q} & \simeq H_p(H^{hor}_q(Q^A_\bullet \otimes Q^B_\bullet)) \\ & \simeq \left\{ \array{ (L_p ( A \otimes_R (-) ))(B) & if \; q = 0 \\ 0 \; otherwise } \right. \end{aligned} \,.

Now both of these second pages are concentrated in a single row and hence have converged on that page already. Therefore, since they both converge to the same value:

L p(() RB)(A) AE p,0 2 AE p,0 BE p,0 2L p(A R())(B). L_p((-)\otimes_R B)(A) \simeq {}^A E^2_{p,0} \simeq {}^A E^\infty_{p,0} \simeq {}^B E^2_{p,0} \simeq L_p(A \otimes_R (-))(B) \,.

Applications

References

For instance section 2.7 of

Last revised on May 4, 2020 at 18:31:05. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.