This page collects material related to the book
Sketches of an Elephant – A Topos Theory Compendium
Oxford University Press (2002)
Volume 1: ISBN:9780198534259
Volume 2: ISBN:9780198515982
Volume 3: (long announced, yet to be published)
on topos theory.
The title refers to the strikingly different aspects of topos theory (such as functorial geometry versus mathematical logic) by alluding to the Indian folklore story of the blind men and the elephant (cf. E. J. Robinson’s Tales and Poems of South India), recalled in Johnstone’s preface like this:
“Four men, who had been blind from birth, wanted to know what an elephant was like; so they asked an elephant-driver for information. He led them to an elephant, and invited them to examine it; so one man felt the elephant’s leg, another its trunk, another its tail and the fourth its ear. Then they attempted to describe the elephant to one another. The first man said ”The elephant is like a tree“. ”No,“ said the second, ”the elephant is like a snake“. ”Nonsense!“ said the third, ”the elephant is like a broom“. ”You are all wrong,“ said the fourth, ”the elephant is like a fan“. And so they went on arguing amongst themselves, while the elephant stood watching them quietly.”
Examples
The paragraph before B3.4.8 refers to A4.1.13, but should probably refer instead to A4.1.15.
(…)
Lemma 2.1.7 is incorrect as stated: one should assume that is a sheaf for a (sifted) coverage. See here for details.
The statement that the induced coverage inherits closure properties requires assumptions on either the coverage or the subcategory. See the discussion here.
…
…
Example C3.6.15(e) says that is equivalent to , but the referred-to paper “Local maps of toposes” seems to say that it should be equivalent to instead.
Last revised on December 25, 2024 at 17:24:04. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.