nLab Floreanini-Jackiw theory

Context

Quantum Field Theory

algebraic quantum field theory (perturbative, on curved spacetimes, homotopical)

Introduction

Concepts

field theory:

Lagrangian field theory

quantization

quantum mechanical system, quantum probability

free field quantization

gauge theories

interacting field quantization

renormalization

Theorems

States and observables

Operator algebra

Local QFT

Perturbative QFT

Contents

Idea

The Floreanini-Jackiw Lagrangian (FL, due to Floreanini & Jackiw 1987) is a Lagrangian density for a scalar field in 2-dimensions whose equations of motion single out (essentially) just the “right moving” (“chiral”) half of solutions of the usual relativistic wave equation: the chiral boson. As such, the FJ-Lagrangian density is an approach, in low dimension, to the notoriously subtle problem of finding Lagrangian densities for self-dual higher gauge fields.

The FL-Lagrangian arises also as the effective boundary field theory of abelian Chern-Simons theory (Wen 1992 §2.5, 1995 §3.3, cf. Tong 2016 §6.1.2). This realizes the FL theory as the abelian case of Wess-Zumino-Witten theory (cf. CS/WZW correspondence) and witnesses it as the effective field theory of edge modes in fractional quantum Hall systems.

From abelian Chern-Simons theory

The Lagrangian density of abelian Chern-Simons theory with gauge field 1-form aa is

(1)L(a)=k4πada. L(a) = \tfrac{k}{4\pi} a \wedge \mathrm{d}a \mathrlap{\,.}

Consider this now on a globally hyperbolic 3D spacetime X 1,0×X 2X^{1,0} \times X^2:

  1. with vanishing first de Rham cohomology

    (2)H dR 1(X 2)=0, H^1_{dR}\big(X^2\big) = 0 \mathrlap{\,,}
  2. with spatial boundary

    X 1,0×X 2X 1,0×X 2. X^{1,0} \times \partial X^2 \;\subset\; X^{1,0} \times X^2 \mathrlap{\,.}

Now (Wen 1992 above (2.62), 1995 above (3.44), Tong 2016 below (6.9), Lopez & Fradkin 2001 (3.4), Wolf, Read & Teh 2023 above (2.15))

  1. choose temporal gauge

    (3)a t=0, a_{\partial_{t'}} = 0 \mathrlap{\,,}
  2. a potential 0-form ϕ\phi solving the induced Gauss law constraint ia j ja i=0\partial_i a_j - \partial_j a_i = 0, by (2):

    (4)a i=d iϕ, a_i = \mathrm{d}_i\phi \,,

    where (x i) i=1 2(x^i)_{i = 1}^{2} denote local coordinate functions on X 2X^2.

Then, by Stokes' theorem, the CS Lagrangian density (1) becomes a boundary Lagrangian density for ϕ\phi on X 1,0×X 2X^{1,0} \times \partial X^2 as follows (indicated in Wen 1992 (2.62)):

k4π X 1,0×X 2ada =k4π X 1,0×X 2(a ta)dt by(3) =k4π X 1,0×X 2ϵ ij( iϕ)( t jϕ)dtdx 1dx 2 by(4) =k4π X 1,0×X 2ϵ ij j(( iϕ)( tϕ))dtdx 1dx 2 by Leibniz' rule =k4π X 1,0×X 2(( iϕ)( tϕ))dtd ix by Stokes' theorem. \begin{array}{rll} \tfrac{k}{4\pi} \int_{X^{1,0} \times X^2} a \wedge \mathrm{d} a & = - \tfrac{k}{4\pi} \int_{X^{1,0} \times X^2} \big( a \wedge \partial_{t'} a \big) \mathrm{d}t' & \text{by}\;\text{(3)} \\ & = - \tfrac{k}{4\pi} \int_{X^{1,0} \times X^2} \epsilon^{i j} (\partial_i \phi) (\partial_{t'} \partial_j \phi) \mathrm{d}t' \wedge \mathrm{d} x^1 \wedge \mathrm{d}x^2 & \text{by}\;\text{(4)} \\ & = - \tfrac{k}{4\pi} \int_{X^{1,0} \times X^2} \epsilon^{i j} \partial_j \big( (\partial_i \phi) (\partial_{t'} \phi) \big) \mathrm{d}t' \wedge \mathrm{d}x^1 \wedge \mathrm{d}x^2 & \text{by Leibniz' rule} \\ & = \tfrac{k}{4\pi} \int_{X^{1,0} \times \partial X^2} \big( (\partial_i \phi) (\partial_{t'} \phi) \big) \mathrm{d}t' \wedge \mathrm{d}^i x & \text{by Stokes' theorem.} \end{array}

Often this is considered for X 2X^2 the upper half plane with coordinate xx along the edge, in which case the boundary Lagrangian density is hence

L(ϕ)=k4π( xϕ)( tϕ). L(\phi) = \tfrac{k}{4\pi} (\partial_x \phi) (\partial_{t'}\phi) \mathrlap{\,.}

Now, understanding (Wen ‘92 (2.64))

ttcx t' \coloneqq t - c x

as a lightcone gauge coordinate, this reads:

L(ϕ)=k4π( xϕ)( tc xϕ). L(\phi) = \tfrac{k}{4\pi} (\partial_x \phi) \big( \partial_{t} - c \partial_x\phi \big) \mathrlap{\,.}

This is, up to normalization, the Floreanini-Jackiw Lagrangian density.

In applications to solid state physics, the “speed of light”, cc, here is taken to be the propagation speed of edge mode currents and typically denoted “vv”, understood to be a free parameter.

Lagrangian and Equations of motion

For ϕ\phi a scalar field on 2\mathbb{R}^2 (the latter equipped with its canonical coordinate functions, here denoted tt for time and xx for space), the FL Lagrangian density is (FL ‘87 (20)):

L(ϕ)12( xϕ)( tϕc xϕ), L(\phi) \;\coloneqq\; \tfrac{1}{2} (\partial_x\phi) \big( \partial_t \phi - c \partial_x \phi \big) \mathrlap{\,,}

where c{0}c \in \mathbb{R} \setminus \{0\} is a constant which sets the velocity (the speed of light, often set to c=1c = 1).

The corresponding Euler-Lagrange equation of motion is

( tc x) xϕ=0. \big( \partial_t - c \partial_x \big) \partial_x \phi = 0 \mathrlap{\,.}

The general solutions to this equation are of the form

(5)ϕ(t,x)=ϕ c(x+ct)+g(t) \phi(t,x) = \phi_c(x + c t) + g(t)

where gg is an arbitrary (smooth) function of just the temporal coordinate tt (hence is a “spatial zero mode”), while ϕ c\phi_c is a solution of the chiral/right-moving wave equation

( tc x)ϕ c=0. \big( \partial_t - c \partial_x \big) \phi_c = 0 \mathrlap{\,.}

As effective theory of FQH edge modes

When the the FL theory is understood as an effective field theory for edge modes of fractional quantum Hall liquids (Wen 1992 §2.5, review in Tong 2016 p. 207), it is the spatial derivative

ρ xϕ \rho \coloneqq \partial_x \phi

which represents the current density on the edge, and by (5) this again satisfies the chiral wave equation

( tcx)ρ=0. \big( \partial_t - c \partial x \big) \rho = 0 \mathrlap{\,.}

References

General

The original article:

A manifestly Lorentz group-invariant re-formulation:

As EFT for FQH edge modes

Interpretation as the boundary field theory of abelian Chern-Simons theory, in the context of effective field theory for edge modes of fractional quantum Hall systems:

reviewed in:

In the generality of multi-component (K-matrix) FQH systems:

Including non-relativistic corrections (Newton-Cartan geometry):

Last revised on April 16, 2026 at 12:11:16. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.