Postnikov system


Homotopy theory

Factorization systems

(,1)(\infty,1)-Topos Theory

(∞,1)-topos theory





Extra stuff, structure and property



structures in a cohesive (∞,1)-topos



The Postnikov system is the infinitary factorization system of (n-epi, n-mono)-factorizations through n-images in an (∞,1)-topos.

The basic (and historically first) example is the factorization in ∞Grpd/Top of morphisms to the point: here the Postnikov system assigns to a homotopy type XX a tower

XX 3X 2X 1X 0* X \to \cdots \to X_3 \to X_2 \to X_1 \to X_0 \simeq *

where each X kX_k is a homotopy (k-2)-type/(n-2)-truncated object and such that each morphism X k+1X kX_{k+1} \to X_k induces an isomorphism on homotopy groups in degree k2\leq k-2. This may be thought of as decomposing XX into its “layers” as seen by the degree of homotopy groups. The characteristic classes which give the ∞-group extension in each layer are called the Postnikov invariants or k-invariants of XX.

More generally, in any (∞,1)-topos and for any morphism f:XYf \colon X \to Y the corresponding Postnikov system is a tower

f:Xim (f)im 2(f)im 1(f)im 0(f)Y f \colon X \simeq im_\infty(f) \to \cdots \to im_2(f) \to im_1(f) \to im_0(f) \simeq Y

of n-images of ff which interpolates between XX and YY along ff: the object im n(f)im_n(f) is a homotopy type that looks like XX in low degrees (below n1n-1), looks like YY in high degrees (above degree nn) and looks like the ordinary (1-topos theoretic) image of ff on homotopy groups in degree n1n-1 itself.


In full generality, the Postnikov system is the infinitary factorization system of (n-epi, n-mono)-factorizations through n-images in an (∞,1)-topos.

The following spells this out explicitly for default homotopy theory, hence in ∞Grpd and in terms of the presentation by the model structure on topological spaces and the model structure on simplicial sets:

With a little bit of care this induces corresponding presentations of Postnikov systems in general (∞,1)-topos by prolonging to suitable model structures on simplicial presheaves:

For more discussion of the general abstract situation see at

For topological spaces

Historically, Postnikov systems were first described on the model of homotopy types constituted by topological spaces.

A Postnikov system or Postnikov tower or Moore-Postnikov tower/system of topological spaces, or rather of their homotopy types, is a sequence of path connected, pointed topological spaces X (n)X^{(n)}, n1n \geq 1, such that π r(X (n))=0\pi_r(X^{(n)})=0 for r>nr \gt n, together with a sequence π n\pi_n of modules of the fundamental group π 1(X (1))\pi_1(X^{(1)}) of X (1)X^{(1)} and fibrations p n:X (n+1)X (n)p_n : X^{(n+1)} \to X^{(n)} classified up to homotopy type by a specified cohomology class k n+1H n+1(X (n),π n)k^{n+1} \in H^{n+1}(X^{(n)}, \pi_n).

For simplicial sets

We discuss the realization of Postnikov systems on simplicial sets/Kan complexes, first in the

and then more generally for the

Absolute version


Let XX be a simplicial set. A Postnikov tower for XX is

  1. a sequence

    X 2q 1X 1q 0X 0 \cdots \to X_2 \stackrel{q_1}{\to} X_1 \stackrel{q_0}{\to} X_0

    with maps i n:XX ni_n : X \to X_n such that all diagrams

    X i n i n1 X n q n1 X n1 \array{ && X \\ & {}^{\mathllap{i_n}}\swarrow && \searrow^{\mathrlap{i_{n-1}}} \\ X_n && \stackrel{q_{n-1}}{\to} && X_{n-1} }


  2. such that for all vertices vX 0v \in X_0 we have for the homotopy groups

    π >n(X n,v)=0 \pi_{\gt n}( X_n, v) = 0


    (i n) *:π i(X,v)π iX n (i_n)_* : \pi_i (X,v) \stackrel{\simeq}{\to} \pi_i X_n

    for ini \leq n.

This appears for instance as (GoerssJardine, def VI 3.1).

Relative version


Let f:XYf : X \to Y be a homomorphism of simplicial sets. A (relative) Postnikov tower for ff is a tower

X im (f) im 2(f) im 1(f) im 0(f) Y \array{ X \\ \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\simeq}} \\ im_\infty(f) \\ \downarrow \\ \vdots \\ \downarrow \\ im_2(f) \\ \downarrow \\ im_1(f) \\ \downarrow \\ im_0(f) \\ \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\simeq}} \\ Y }

that factors f:XYf : X \to Y such that for all nn \in \mathbb{N}

  1. Xim n(f)X \to im_n(f)

    1. induces an epimorphism on homotopy groups in degree n1n-1;

    2. induces an isomorphism on homotopy groups in degree <n1\lt n-1

  2. im n(f)Yim_n(f) \to Y

    1. induces a monomorphism on homotopy groups in degree n1n-1;

    2. induces an isomorphism on homotopy groups in degree n\geq n.

This appears for instance as (Goerss-Jardine, def. VI 2.9).


By the long exact sequence of homotopy groups, the relative Postnikov tower is the tower of the (n-connected, n-truncated) factorization system of ff regarded as a morphism in the (∞,1)-category ∞Grpd: is is the n-epimorphism,n-monomorphism factorization through the n-image of a morphism.

For simplicial presheaves


We discuss explicit constructions/presentations of Postnikov systems.

For simplicial sets

There are three main functorial models for the Postnikov tower of a simplicial set:

Coskeleton tower


If XX is regarded as an ∞-groupoid modeled as a Kan complex, then the coskeleton sequence

X=lim ncosk nXcosk n+1Xcosk nX* X = \lim_n cosk_n X \to \cdots \to cosk_{n+1} X \to cosk_{n} X \to \cdots \to *

exhibits a Postnikov tower for XX.

This is observed for instance in (ArtinMazur)) or (DwyerKan). Also see coskeleton for more details.

Identification relative to skeleta

The following construction quotients out the relations encoded by the cells that are thrown in in the above construction, such as to make the maps in the Postnikov tower into Kan fibrations.

We first discuss the absolute tower and then the relative version.

Absolute Postnikov tower

Let XX be a Kan complex. Define for each nn \in \mathbb{N} an equivalence relation n\sim_n on the simplices of XX as follows: two qq-simplices

α,β:Δ qX \alpha, \beta : \Delta^q \to X

are equivalent if their restriction to the nn-skeleton coincides

sk n(α)=sk n(β):sk n(Δ q)Δ qX. sk_n(\alpha) = sk_n(\beta) : sk_n(\Delta^q) \hookrightarrow \Delta^q \to X \,.


X(n):=X/ n X(n) := X/_{\sim_n}

for the quotient simplicial set.

There are evident morphisms

X(n)X(n1). X(n) \to X(n-1).

This is a Postnikov tower, def. 1, and all morphisms are Kan fibrations.

Moreover the canonical morphism

Xlim nX(n) X \to \lim_{\leftarrow_n} X(n)

is an isomorphism, exhibiting XX as the limit (“inverse limit”) over this tower diagram.

This appears for instance as (GoerssJardine, theorem Vi 3.5).

Relative Postnikov tower

We discuss a model for the relative Postnikov tower, def. 2.


For f:XYf : X \to Y a Kan fibration between Kan complexes, define for each nn and each kk an equivalence relation n\sim_n on kk-simplices

α,β:Δ kX \alpha, \beta \colon \Delta^k \to X

such that α nβ\alpha \sim_n \beta if

  1. the nn-skeleta sk nΔ kΔ kα,βXsk_n \Delta^k \to \Delta^k \stackrel{\alpha, \beta}{\to} X are equal;

  2. the images f(α),f(β)Yf(\alpha), f(\beta)\in Y are equal.


im n+1(f)X/ n im_{n+1}(f) \coloneqq X/\sim_n

be the simplicial set of equivalence classes under this equivalence relation.

This canonically comes with morphisms im n 1(f)im n 2(f)im_{n_1}(f) \to im_{n_2}(f) for n 1>n 20\infty \geq n_1 \gt n_2 \geq 0.

For instance (Goerss-Jardine, def. VI 2.9).


This construction gives indeed a relative Postnikov tower for ff.

For instance (Goerss-Jardine, theorem VI 2.11).

Homotopy classes relative to skeleta

For XX a Kan complex and nn \in \mathbb{N}, let τ <nX\tau_{\lt n}X be the simplicial set defined as the quotient

τ <mX:kX k/homotopyrel(n1)skeleton, \tau_{\lt m}X : k \mapsto X_k / homotopy-rel-(n-1)-skeleton \,,

where two kk-cells are identified if there is a simplicial homotopy between them that fixes their (n1)(n-1)-skeleton.

This is due to John Duskin. See for instance (Beke, pages 302-305).

For strict ω\omega-groupoids


Consider an object in sSet/∞Grpd that is in the image of StrωGrpdStr\omega Grpd, hence given by a morphism f:XYf \colon X \to Y of strict ω-groupoids.

Then for nn \in \mathbb{N} the (n1)(n-1)-Postnikov stage of ff is given by the strict ω-groupoid im n(f)im_n(f) with

(im n(f)) k={X k k<n1 im(X n1)Y n1 k=n1 * kn \left(im_n\left(f\right)\right)_k = \left\{ \array{ X_k & \forall k \lt n-1 \\ im(X_{n-1}) \subset Y_{n-1} & \forall \; k = n-1 \\ \ast & \forall k \geq n } \right.

equipped with the evident composition operations induced from those of XX and YY, and equipped with the canonical morphisms of strict ω\omega-groupoids

Xim n(f)* X \to im_n(f) \to \ast

(the left one being the identity in degree k<n1k \lt n-1, the quotent projection in degree n1n-1 and ff in degree knk \geq n, and the right one being ff in degree k<n1k \lt n-1, the image inclusion in degree n1n-1 and the identity in degree knk \geq n).

This is discussed in (BFGM).


The homotopy groups of a strict ω\omega-groupoid in any degree kk are simply given by the groups of kk-automorphisms of the identity (k1)(k-1)-morphism on a given baspoint modulo (k+1)(k+1)-morphisms (hence the homology of the corresponding crossed complex in that degree). Therefore it is clear from the construction of im n(f)im_n(f) above that Xim n(f)X \to im_n(f) is surjective on π 0\pi_0 and an isomorphism on π k<n1\pi_{k \lt n-1}, and that im n(f)im_n(f) is a monomorphism on π n1\pi_{n-1} and an isomorphism on π kn\pi_{k \geq n}.

For chain complexes

The following gives a model for the (n1)(n-1)-stage of a relative Postnikov tower for the special case that the the morphism of Kan complexes is the image under the Dold-Kan correspondence of a chain map between chain complexes.

Before we give the explicit formule below as prop. 5, the following remark 2 motivates the formula by regarding chain complexes as models for strict ω-groupoids (by this prop.orrespondence#GlobularAndCubical))


Let f :V W f_\bullet \colon V_\bullet \longrightarrow W_\bullet be a chain map between chain complexes

For nn \in \mathbb{N}, consider the abelian group

(im n+1(f)) ncoker(ker( V)ker(f n)V n) (im_{n+1}(f))_n \;\coloneqq\; coker(\, ker(\partial_V) \cap ker(f_n) \to V_n \,)

For the following it is helpful to think of this abelian group in the following equivalent ways.

Define an equivalence relation on V nV_n by

(v nv n)(( Vv n= Vv n)and(f n(v n)=f n(v n))). \left( v_n \sim v'_n \right) \;\Leftrightarrow\; \left( (\partial_V v_n = \partial_V v'_n) \;\text{and}\; (f_n(v_n) = f_n(v'_n)) \right) \,.


(im n+1(f)) nV n/ (im_{n+1}(f))_n \simeq V_n/_\sim

is equivalently the set of equivalence classes of this equivalence relation, which inherits abelian group structure since the eqivalence relation is linear.

This is because the equivalence relation says equivalently that

(v nv n)(v nv nker( V)ker(f n)) \left( v_n \sim v'_n \right) \;\Leftrightarrow\; \left( v_n - v'_n \;\in\; ker(\partial_V) \cap ker(f_n) \right)

and hence is generated under linearity by

(v n0)(v nker( V)ker(f n)). \left( v_n \sim 0 \right) \;\Leftrightarrow\; \left( v_n \in ker(\partial_V) \cap ker(f_n) \right) \,.

Moreover, notice that the Dold-Kan correspondence

DK:Ch 0KanCplx DK \;\colon\; Ch_{\bullet \geq 0} \longrightarrow KanCplx

factors through globular strict omega-groupoids (here). An n-morphism in the strict omega-groupoid DK(V )DK(V_\bullet) is of the form

(v n1)AAv nAA(v n1+v n). (v_{n-1}) \overset{\phantom{AA}v_n\phantom{AA}}{\longrightarrow} (v_{n-1} + \partial v_n) \,.

In terms of these morphisms the equivalence relation above says that two of them are equivalent precisely if

  1. they are “parallel morphisms” in that they have the same source and target;

  2. they have the same image under ff in the n-morphisms of DK(W )DK(W_\bullet).

This suggests yet another equivalent way to think of (im n+1(f)) n(im_{n+1}(f))_n: it is the disjoint union over the target (n1)(n-1)-cells in V n1V_{n-1} of the images under ff of the sets of nn-cells from zero to that target:

(im n+1(f)) nv n1V n1{f n(v n)|v nV nandv n=v n1}. (im_{n+1}(f))_n \simeq \underset{v_{n-1} \in V_{n-1}}{\sqcup} \left\{ f_n(v_n) \vert v_n \in V_n \,\text{and}\,\partial v_n = v_{n-1} \right\} \,.

Let f :V W f_\bullet \colon V_\bullet \longrightarrow W_\bullet be a chain map between chain complexes and let nn \in \mathbb{N}. Recall the abelian group v n1{f n(v n)|v n=v n1}\underset{v_{n-1}}{\sqcup}\{f_n(v_n) \vert \partial v_n = v_{n-1}\} from remark 2.

The following diagram of abelian groups commutes:

V W W V n+3 f n+3 W n+3 = W n+3 V W W V n+2 f n+2 W n+2 = W n+2 V W W V n+1 f n+1 {w n+1|v n: Ww n+1=f n(v n), Vv n=0,} W n+1 V W W V n (f n, V) v n1{f n(v n)| Vv n=v n1} W n V (f n(v n), Vv n) Vv n W V n1 = V n1 f n1 W n1 V V W V n2 = V n2 f n2 W n2 V V W \array{ \vdots && \vdots && \vdots \\ \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\partial_{V}}} && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\partial_{W}}} && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\partial_{W}}} \\ V_{n+3} &\overset{f_{n+3}}{\longrightarrow}& W_{n+3} &\overset{=}{\longrightarrow}& W_{n+3} \\ \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\partial_{V}}} && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\partial_{W}}} && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\partial_{W}}} \\ V_{n+2} &\overset{f_{n+2}}{\longrightarrow}& W_{n+2} &\overset{=}{\longrightarrow}& W_{n+2} \\ \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\partial_{V}}} && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{ \partial_W } } && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\partial_{W}}} \\ V_{n+1} &\overset{f_{n+1}}{\longrightarrow}& \left\{ w_{n+1} | \exists v_n : \partial_W w_{n+1} = f_n(v_n), \partial_V v_n = 0, \right\} &\overset{}{\longrightarrow}& W_{n+1} \\ \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\partial_{V}}} && \downarrow^{\partial_W} && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\partial_{W}}} \\ V_n &\overset{ (f_n, \partial_V) }{\longrightarrow}& \underset{v_{n-1}}{\sqcup} \left\{ f_n(v_n) \vert \partial_V v_n = v_{n-1} \right\} &\overset{ }{\longrightarrow}& W_n \\ \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\partial_V}} && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{(f_n(v_n),\partial_V v_n) \mapsto \partial_V v_n}} && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\partial_W}} \\ V_{n-1} &\overset{=}{\longrightarrow}& V_{n-1} &\overset{f_{n-1}}{\longrightarrow}& W_{n-1} \\ \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\partial_{V}}} && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\partial_{V}}} && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\partial_W}} \\ V_{n-2} &\overset{=}{\longrightarrow}& V_{n-2} &\overset{f_{n-2}}{\longrightarrow}& W_{n-2} \\ \\ \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\partial_{V}}} && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\partial_{V}}} && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\partial_W}} \\ \vdots && \vdots && \vdots }

Moreover, the middle vertical sequence is a chain complex im n+1(f) im_{n+1}(f)_\bullet, and hence the diagram gives a factorization of f f_\bullet into two chain maps

f :V im n+1(f) W . f_\bullet \;\colon\; V_\bullet \longrightarrow im_{n+1}(f)_\bullet \longrightarrow W_\bullet \,.

Finally, this is a model for the (n+1)-image factorization of ff in that on homology groups the following holds:

  1. H <n(V)H <n(im n+1(f))H_{\bullet \lt n}(V) \overset{\simeq}{\to} H_{\bullet \lt n}(im_{n+1}(f)) are isomorphisms;

  2. H n(V)H n(im n+1(f))H n(W)H_n(V) \to H_n(im_{n+1}(f)) \hookrightarrow H_n(W) is the image factorization of H n(f)H_n(f);

  3. H >n(im n+1(f))H >n(W)H_{\bullet \gt n}(im_{n+1}(f)) \overset{\simeq}{\to} H_{\bullet \gt n}(W) are isomorphisms.


This follows by elementary and straightforward direct inspection.

In simplicial (pre-)sheaves

The following gives a sufficient condition for modeling n-image factorizations in some (∞,1)-toposes with particularly convenient presentation.


Let CC be a site with enough points, so that the weak equivalences in sPSh(C) locsPSh(C)_{\mathrm{loc}} are detected on stalks (this prop.). Then given a morphism of Kan complex-valued simplicial presheaves

f:XY f \colon X \longrightarrow Y

such that both XX and YY are homotopy k-types for some finite kk \in \mathbb{N}, then its n-image factorization in the (∞,1)-topos L lwhesPSh(C) locL_{lwhe} sPSh(C)_{loc} for any nn \in \mathbb{N} is presented by any factorization Xim n(f)YX \longrightarrow im_{n}(f) \longrightarrow Y in sPSh(C)sPSh(C) through some Kan-complex valued simplicial presheaf im n(f)im_n(f) such that for each object UCU \in C the simplicial homotopy groups satisfy the following conditions:

  1. π <n(X(U)(im n(f))(U))\pi_{\bullet \lt n}\left(X(U) \to (im_{n}(f))(U)\right) are isomorphisms;

  2. π n(X(U)(im n(f))(U)Y(U))\pi_n\left(X(U) \to (im_{n}(f))(U)\to Y(U)\right) is the (epi,mono) factorization of π n(f(U))\pi_n(f(U));

  3. π >n((im n(f))(U)Y(U))\pi_{\bullet \gt n}\left((im_{n}(f))(U) \to Y(U)\right) are isomorphisms.


Evalutation on stalks is a filtered colimit which preserves the finite limits and finite colimits that go into the definition of simplicial homotopy groups. Therefore the global conditions assumed on the simplicial homotopy groups imply that the same kind of conditions holds for the stalkwise homotopy groups. These are the categorical homotopy groups in L lwhesPSh(C) locL_{lwhe} sPSh(C)_{loc}. By this prop. and this def. we may recognize nn-truncation of morphisms on categorical homotopy groups (using the assumption that XX and YY are kk-truncated for some kk). Therefore the claim now follows from the stalkwise long exact sequence of homotopy groups.



It is known that Postnikov systems classify all weak, pointed connected homotopy types. In particular, if XX satisfies π r(X)=0\pi_r(X)=0 for 1<r<n1 \lt r \lt n then the first non trivial Postnikov invariant is an element k n+1k^{n+1} of group cohomology (with twisted coefficients of course). Such elements are also determined by nn-fold crossed extensions of π n\pi_n by π 1\pi_1, which are exact crossed complexes of the form

0π nC nC n1C 2C 1 0 \to \pi_n \to C_n \to C_{n-1} \to \cdots \to C_2 \to C_1

together with an isomorphism Coker(C 2C 1)π 1Coker(C_2 \to C_1) \cong \pi_1. This gives an algebraic model of such an nn-type. Advantages of algebraic models are that algebraic constructions can be made on them, such as forming limits or colimits. The various higher homotopy van Kampen theorems are useful in the latter case. For example, it may be difficult or well nigh impossible to write down a determination of the Postnikov invariant of a pushout of crossed modules, even if the pushout consists of finite groups.

A Postnikov system is easiest to understand in the 2-stage case, i.e. two non vanishing homotopy groups, and focuses attention on the cohomology of Eilenberg-Mac Lane spaces, which also determine all cohomology operations. Basic work on this area was done by Eilenberg and Mac Lane, and by H. Cartan, while the theory of cohomology operations, including Steenrod operations, is itself a large area.

The reference below shows the problems in the 3-stage systems.

For homotopy 3-types, the algebraic model of crossed squares is more explicit than the corresponding Postnikov system, and more calculable. However, not much work has been done on, say, cohomology operations using the algebraic model of nn-fold groupoids, and it is not clear if that would help.

For simplicial sets


Let XX be a Kan complex and {X(n)}\{X(n)\} the model for its Postnikov tower from prop. 2. For any vertex vX 0v \in X_0 write K(n)K(n) for the pullback

K(n) * b X(n) X(n1). \array{ K(n) &\to& * \\ \downarrow && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{b}} \\ X(n) &\to& X(n-1) } \,.

Let K(π n(X,v),n)K(\pi_n (X,v), n) be the Eilenberg-MacLane object on the nn-homotopy group of XX. Then there is a weak homotopy equivalence

K(n)K(π n(X,v),n). K(n) \stackrel{\simeq}{\to} K(\pi_n(X,v),n) \,.

This appears for instance as GoerssJardine, corollary VI 3.7.


Since K(n)K(n1)K(n) \to K(n-1) is a Kan fibration by prop. 2 the pullback K(n)K(n) is the homotopy fiber of X(n)X(n1)X(n) \to X(n-1).


There are analogues in other setups, e.g.

Postnikov tower in an (,1)(\infty,1)-category

We may think of Top as being the archetypical (∞,1)-category.

In every (∞,1)-category there is a notion of n-truncated object and accordingly a notion of

The traditional case of Postnikov towers in Top is a special case of this more general concept.


A standard textbook reference is section 8 of

and section VI of

Orginal references include

  • M. M. Postnikov, Determination of the homology groups of a space by means of the homotopy invariants, Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.) 76: 359–362 (1951)

  • George Whitehead, Elements of homotopy theory, chapter 9

  • Donald W. Kahn, The spectral sequence of a Postnikov system, Comm. Math. Helv. 40, n.1, 169–198, 1965 doi

  • P. I. Booth, An explicit classification of three-stage Postnikov towers, Homology, homotopy and applications 8 (2006), No. 2, 133–155

  • G. J. Ellis and R. Mikhailov, A colimit of classifying spaces, arXiv:0804.3581.

Probably the earliest treatment of Postnikov systems for simplicial sets is in

  • J. C. Moore, Semisimplicial complexes and Postnikov systems, Symposium Internacional de Topologia Algebraica, Mexico City, 1958, pp. 232-247,

and as a result, in that context, they are sometimes referred to as Moore-Postnikov systems

The coskeleton construction for the Postnikov tower of a Kan complex is already in

Another classical article that amplifies the expression of Postnikov towers in terms of coskeleta is

Analogous remarks are also in

  • John Duskin Simplicial matrices and the nerves of weak nn-categories I: Nerves of bicategories , TAC 9 no. 2, (2002). (web)

reviewed around page 302 in

  • Tibor Beke, Higher Čech theory, K-Theory, 32(4):293–322 (2004) (web)

Discussion for spectra includes

Discussion in homotopy type theory is in

Discussion for homotopy types modeled by crossed complexes/strict ω-groupoids is in

  • M. Bullejos, E. Faro, and M. A. García-Munoz, Postnikov Invariants of Crossed Complexes, Journal of Algebra Volume 285, Issue 1, 1 March 2005, Pages 238–291 (arXiv:math/0409339).

and for nn-hypergroupoids in the thesis,

  • M. A. García-Munoz, 2003, Un aceramiento algebraico a la theoría de Torres de Postnikov, thesis, Universidad de Granada.

This also contains a good discussion of the link with twisted cohomology and homotopy colimits.

A pedagogical introduction to Postnikov systems with an eye towards their generalization from homotopy types to n-categories is in

Revised on June 6, 2017 08:39:27 by Urs Schreiber (