Let be some category of modules or bimodules (say over a ring, algebra, or operator algebra). Then an subobject is an essential submodule of (or, we say that is an essential extension of ) if has nonzero intersection (pullback in more abstract situations) with any nonzero subobject of (or equivalently, has zero intersection with only the zero subobject of ). In -algebraic setup the ideals in the definition are required to be closed and 2-sided.
In particular, one applies this terminology to ideals, i.e. submodules (or subbimodules in the -sided case) of a ring, algebra, or operator algebra itself. Hence we talk about essential ideals. For essential extensions, one considers extensions of algebras, where ‘essential’ still refers to non-intersection with submodules rather than with subalgebras?.
A monomorphism of modules is an essential embedding if is an essential extension of . This alternative terminology is useful to motivate the notion of essential embeddability in as a property of .
If is a ring a (say, left) -module is uniform if every nonzero submodule of is essential. In other words, the intersection of any two nonzero submodules of is nonzero.
In
the following generalization is considered. A morphism h in a class of morphisms in a category is -essential if for every morphism , the composite lies in only if does. If is the class of monomorphisms we get the standard notion of an essential extension.
Last revised on June 28, 2024 at 21:57:18. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.