For the concept in category theory see at exponential object.
transfinite arithmetic, cardinal arithmetic, ordinal arithmetic
prime field, p-adic integer, p-adic rational number, p-adic complex number
arithmetic geometry, function field analogy
analysis (differential/integral calculus, functional analysis, topology)
metric space, normed vector space
open ball, open subset, neighbourhood
convergence, limit of a sequence
compactness, sequential compactness
continuous metric space valued function on compact metric space is uniformly continuous
…
…
symmetric monoidal (∞,1)-category of spectra
The exponential function of classical analysis given by the series,
is the solution of the differential equation
with initial value $f(0) = 1$.
It is also the limit of the following sequence of polynomial functions
This classical function is defined on the real line (or the complex plane). To generalise it to other manifolds, we need two things:
So in the end we have, for any point $p$ on a differentiable manifold $M$ with an affine connection $\Del$, a map $\exp_p\colon T_p M \to M$, which is defined at least on a neighbourhood of $0$ in the tangent space $T_p M$.
Note that $p$ here comes from the initial value $\exp_p 0 = p$; we usually take $p = 1$ when we work in a Lie group, but otherwise we are really generalising the classical exponential function $x \mapsto p \exp x$; every solution to $f' = f$ takes this form.
Classically, there are some other functions called ‘exponential’; given any nonzero real (or complex) number $b$, the map $x \mapsto b^x$ (or even $x \mapsto p\, b^x$) is also an exponential map. Using the natural logarithm, we can define $b^x$ in terms of the natural exponential map $\exp$:
So while $b$ is traditionally called the ‘base’, it is really the number $\ln b$ that matters, or even better the operation of multiplication by $\ln b$. This operation is an endomorphism of the real line (or complex plane), and every such endomorphism takes this form for some nonzero $b$ (and some branch of the natural logarithm, in the complex case). So we see that this generalised exponential map is simply the composite of the natural exponential map after a linear endomorphism.
See also at flow of a vector field.
Let $M$ be a differentiable manifold, let $\Del$ be an affine connection on $M$, and let $p$ be a point in $M$. Then by the general theory of differential equations, there is a unique maximally defined partial function $\exp_p$ from the tangent space $T_p M$ to $M$ such that:
This function is the natural exponential map on $M$ at $p$ relative to $\Del$. We have $\exp_p\colon U \to M$, where $U$ is some neighbourhood of $0$ in $T_p M$. If $M$ is complete? (relative to $\Del$), then $U$ will be all of $T_p M$.
Let $M$ be a Riemannian manifold (or a pseudo-Riemannian manifold) and let $p$ be a point in $M$. Then $M$ may be equipped with the Levi-Civita connection $\Del_{lc}$, so we define the natural Riemannian exponential map on $M$ at $p$ to be the natural exponential map on $M$ at $p$ relative to $\Del_{lc}$.
Given any endomorphism $\phi\colon T_p M \to T_p M$, we can also consider the exponential map on $M$ at $p$ relative to $\Del$ with logarithmic base $\phi$, which is simply $x \mapsto \exp_p \phi(x)$. We say ‘logarithmic base’ since a classical exponential function with base $b$ corresponds to an exponential function whose logarithmic base is multiplication by $\ln b$.
Recall that a geodesic is a curve on a manifold whose velocity is constant (as measured along that curve relative to a given affine connection). Working naïvely, we may write
pretend that this is a differential equation for a function $\gamma\colon \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$, and take the solution
where $p$ is given by the initial value $\gamma(0) = p$. We recognise this as being, morally, $\exp_p t x$. This suggests (although we need more work for a proof) the following result:
Let $M$ be a differentiable manifold, let $\Del$ be an affine connection on $M$, and let $p$ be a point in $M$. Given a tangent vector $x$ at $p$, there is a unique maximal geodesic $\gamma$ on $M$ tangent to $x$ at $p$. If $\gamma(1)$ is defined (which it will be whenever $M$ is complete? and may be in any case), we have $exp_p x = \gamma(1)$. In any case, we have $\exp_p (t x) = \gamma(t)$ for sufficiently small $t$.
Let $\mathbb{R}$ be any sequentially Cauchy complete Archimedean ordered field, and let $F:\mathbb{R}\mathrm{Alg} \to \mathbb{R}\mathrm{Vect}$ be the forgetful functor which takes an $\mathbb{R}$-algebra $A$ to its underlying $\mathbb{R}$-vector space $F(A)$. Given any $\mathbb{R}$-algebra $A$ whose underlying $\mathbb{R}$-vector space $F(A)$ is finite-dimensional, each element of $A$ could be expressed as a linear combination, a finite sum of basis vectors. Then one could define the exponential function $\exp:A \to A$ as either
or
since according to the algebraic limit theorem, limits distribute over finite sums.
In particular, this is how exponential functions are defined in Clifford algebras and matrix algebras. However, the exponential functions in non-commutative algebras are not abelian group homomorphisms, because multiplication is not commutative while addition is commutative.
The dual number real algebra $\mathbb{D} \coloneqq \mathbb{R}[\epsilon]/\epsilon^2$ has a notion of exponential function, which is the solution to the functional equation $\exp(x + \epsilon) = \exp(x) (1 + \epsilon)$ with $\exp(0) = 1$.
In general, Archimedean ordered fields which are not sequentially Cauchy complete do not have an exponential function. Nevertheless, the exponential map is still guaranteed to be a partial function, because every Archimedean ordered field is a Hausdorff space and thus a sequentially Hausdorff space. Thus, an axiom could be added to an Archimedean ordered field $F$ to ensure that the exponential partial function is actually a total function:
Axiom of exponential function: For all elements $x \in F$, there exists a unique element $\exp(x) \in F$ such that for all positive elements $\epsilon \in F_+$, there exists a natural number $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that for all natural numbers $n \in \mathbb{N}$, if $n \geq N$, then $-\epsilon \lt \left(1 + \frac{x}{n}\right)^{n} - \exp(x) \lt \epsilon$ (or equivalently, $-\epsilon \lt \left(\sum_{i = 0}^{n} \frac{x^i}{i!}\right) - \exp(x) \lt \epsilon$).
There is another axiom which uses the fact that derivatives of functions are well defined in the ordered local Artin $F$-algebra $F[\epsilon]/\epsilon^2$ by the equation $f(x + \epsilon) = f(x) + f'(x) \epsilon$:
Axiom of exponential function: Let $F[\epsilon]/\epsilon^2$ be the ordered local Artin $F$-algebra, with non-zero non-positive non-negative nilpotent element $\epsilon \in F[\epsilon]/\epsilon^2$ where $\epsilon^2 = 0$ and canonical $F$-algebra homomorphism $h:F \to F[x]/x^2$. There exists a unique function $\exp:F \to F$ and a function $\exp':F[\epsilon]/\epsilon^2 \to F[\epsilon]/\epsilon^2$ such that for every element $x \in F$, $h(\exp(x)) = \exp'(h(x))$, $\exp'(x + \epsilon) = \exp'(x) + \exp'(x) \epsilon$, and $\exp'(0) = 1$.
In classical mathematics, one could prove that the modulated Cantor real numbers $\mathbb{R}_C$ are sequentially Cauchy complete and equivalent to the HoTT book real numbers $\mathbb{R}_H$. However, in constructive mathematics, the above cannot be proven; while the HoTT book real numbers $\mathbb{R}_H$ are still sequentially Cauchy complete, the modulated Cantor real numbers $\mathbb{R}_C$ in general cannot be proven to be sequentially Cauchy complete. In particular, this means that the sequences
do not have a limit for all modulated Cantor real numbers $x \in \mathbb{R}_C$. However, the sequences, by definition of $\mathbb{R}_C$, do have a limit for all rational numbers $x \in \mathbb{Q}$; this means that one could restrict the domain of the exponential function to the rational numbers $\exp:\mathbb{Q} \to \mathbb{R}_C$, and define it in the usual manner:
Note: this section is under repair.
The classical exponential function $\exp \colon \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}^*$ or $\exp \colon \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}^*$ satisfies the fundamental property:
The function $\exp \colon \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}^*$ is a homomorphism taking addition to multiplication:
A number of proofs may be given. One rests on the combinatorial binomial identity
(which crucially depends on the fact that multiplication is commutative), whereupon
An alternative proof begins with the observation that $f = \exp$ is the solution to the system $f' = f$, $f(0) = 1$. For each $y$, the function $g_1 \colon x \mapsto f(x) f(y)$ is a solution to the system $g' = g$, $g(0) = f(y)$, as is the function $g_2 \colon x \mapsto f(x + y)$. Then by uniqueness of solutions to ordinary differential equations (over connected domains; see, e.g., here), $g_1 = g_2$, i.e., $f(x + y) = f(x)f(y)$ for all $x, y$.^{1}
Let $M$ be Lie group and let $\mathfrak{g}$ be its Lie algebra $T_1 M$, the tangent space to the identity element $1$. Then $M$ may be equipped with the canonical left-invariant connection $\Del_l$ or the canonical right-invariant connection $\Del_r$. It turns out that the natural Riemannian exponential maps on $M$ at $1$ relative to $\Del_l$ and $\Del_r$ are the same; we define this to be the natural Lie exponential map on $M$ at the identity, denoted simply $\exp$. Several nice properties follow:
(to be expanded on)
A logarithm is a local section of an exponential map.
pane wave?
See also:
An extensive treatment for the general exponential map for an affine connection, for exponential map for Riemannian manifolds and the one for Lie groups is
Specifically for Lie groups, a different detailed treatment of the exponential map is in
Some nice historical notes are in
A previous edit offered even more detail: “An alternative proof begins with the premise that each solution of the ordinary differential equation $g' = 0$ is locally constant. Suppose $c$ is a complex number. As $\exp' = \exp$, we find that $(\exp(x) \exp(c - x))' = \exp(x) \exp(c - x) + \exp(x) (-\exp(c-x)) = 0$. Hence, by the premise and the connectedness of the domain of $\exp$ (either ${\mathbb{R}}$ or ${\mathbb{C}}$), we obtain $\exp(x)\exp(c - x) = \exp(0)\exp(c)$. The initial condition $\exp(0) = 1$ then yields $\exp(x)\exp(c - x) = \exp(c)$. The result follows by setting $c = x + y$.” ↩
Last revised on January 21, 2023 at 16:42:40. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.