nLab nilradical

Contents

Not to be confused with nilpotent ideal, which is a nilpotent element in the lattice of ideals of a ring.


Contents

Definition

For RR a commutative ring, its nilradical IRI \subset R is the ideal of nilpotent elements: the collection of those elements aRa \in R such that there is nn \in \mathbb{N} with a n=0a^n = 0.

The quotient R/IR/I is also called the reduced part of RR.

(If RR is not commutative there are different generalization of the notion of nilradical. See Wikipedia, for the moment.)

Examples

Every local Artinian ring is a commutative ring whose set of non-invertible elements is a nilradical.

With rings regarded as formal duals of affine schemes, the canonical inclusion

SpecR/ISpecR Spec R/I \to Spec R

is to be thought of as exhibiting the inclusion of SpecR/ISpec R/I into an infinitesimal thickening of itself.

For X:CRingSetX : CRing \to Set a presheaf on the category of commutative rings, the presheaf

X dR:SpecRX(SpecR/I) X_{dR} : Spec R \mapsto X(Spec R/I)

is called the de Rham space of XX.

Properties

Relation to prime ideals

Theorem

Assuming the axiom of choice, if RR is a commutative ring, then the nilradical equals the Jacobson radical, the intersection of all prime ideals of RR.

Proof

In one direction, it it elementary that if xx is nilpotent, then xx belongs to any prime 𝔭\mathfrak{p}.

For the other direction, we assume the axiom of choice, or slightly more sharply, the ultrafilter principle, which implies that any non-trivial ring RR has a proper prime ideal 𝔭\mathfrak{p}: see prime ideal theorem. We must show that if xx is not nilpotent, then there is some prime ideal 𝔭\mathfrak{p} that does not contain xx. But if xx is not nilpotent, then the set 1,x,x 2,1, x, x^2, \ldots is a multiplicative set that does not contain 00. It follows that the localization R[x,1x]R[x, \frac1{x}] with respect to this multiplicative set is a non-trivial ring, and hence has a prime ideal 𝔮\mathfrak{q}. The image of xx under the canonical map ϕ:RR[x,1x]\phi: R \to R[x, \frac1{x}] is invertible, hence is not contained in 𝔮\mathfrak{q}. Then the inverse image 𝔭=ϕ 1(𝔮)\mathfrak{p} = \phi^{-1}(\mathfrak{q}) is a prime ideal that does not contain xx.

References

See also:

Last revised on January 2, 2025 at 03:02:23. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.