M-theory on G2-manifolds


String theory


physics, mathematical physics, philosophy of physics

Surveys, textbooks and lecture notes

theory (physics), model (physics)

experiment, measurement, computable physics




The Kaluza-Klein reduction of 11-dimensional supergravity on G2 manifolds (notably Freund-Rubin compactifications and variants) yields an effective N=1N=1 4-dimensional supergravity. This construction is the lift to M-theory of the KK-compactification of string theory on Calabi-Yau manifolds (see at string phenomenology).

In order for this to yield phenomenologically interesting effective physics the compactification space must be an orbifold (hence an orbifold of special holonomy), its stabilizer groups will encode the nonabelian gauge group of the effective theory by “geometric engineering of quantum field theory” (Acharya 98, Atiyah-Witten 01, section 6). Specifically for discussion of string phenomenology obtaining or approximating the standard model of particle physics by this procedure see at G2-MSSM.


Vacuum solutions and the supergravity torsion constraints

Genuine G2-manifold/orbifold fibers, these having vanishing Ricci curvature, correspond to vacuum solutions of the Einstein equations of 11d supergravity, i.e. with vanishing field strength of the gravitino and the supergravity C-field (see e.g. Acharya 02, p. 9). (If one includes non-vanishing CC-field strength one finds “weak G 2G_2-holonomy” instead, see below).

Notice that vanishing gravitino field strength (i.e. covariant derivative) means that the torsion of the super-vielbein is in each tangent space the canonical torsion of the super Minkowski spacetime. This torsion constraint already just for the bosonic part (E a)(E^a) of the super-vielbein (E a,E α)(E^a, E^\alpha) already implies (together with the Bianchi identities) the equations of motion of supergravity, hence here the vacuum Einstein equations in the 11d spacetime.

With non-vanishing CC-field strength

In compactifications with weak G2 holonomy it is the defining 4-form ϕ 4\phi_4 (the one which for strict G2 manifolds is the Hodge dual of the associative 3-form) which is the flux/field strength of the supergravity C-field. See for instance (Bilal-Serendinger-Sfetos 02, section 6):

Consider a KK-compactification-Ansatz X 11=(X 4,g 4)×(X 7,g 7)X_{11} = (X_4,g_4) \times (X_7,g_7) and

  • F 4=fvol X 4F_4 = f vol_{X_4};

  • F 7=g˜e 7 *ϕ 4F_7 = \tilde g e_7^\ast \phi_4

where e 4e_4, e 7e_7 are given vielbein fields on X 4X_4 and X 7X_7 and ϕ 4\phi_4 is the Hodge dual of the associative 3-form. Then the Einstein equations of 11-dimensional supergravity give

R 4=13(f 2+72g˜ 2)g 4 R_4 = - \frac{1}{3}\left(f^2 + \frac{7}{2} \tilde g^2\right) g_4
R 7=16(f 2+5g˜ 2)g 7 R_7 = \frac{1}{6}\left(f^2 + 5 \tilde g^2\right) g_7

(where g 4g_4, g 7g_7 is the metric tensor) saying that both spaces are Einstein manifolds (BSS 02, (5.4)). The equations of motion for the supergravity C-field is

g˜(dϕfϕ) \tilde g\left( d \phi - f \star\phi \right)

for ϕ=e 7 *ϕ 3\phi = e_7^\ast \phi_3 the pullback of the associative 3-form (BSS 02, (5.5)), saying that ϕF 7\phi \propto \star F_7 exhibits weak G2-holonomy with weakness parameter given by the component of the C-field on X 4X_4.


For realistic field content after Kaluza-Klein compactification one needs to consider not smooth (weak) G2-manifolds but conical singularities and orbifolds of these. see the first page of (Acharya-Denef-Hofman-Lambert) for discussion of phenomenology for such orbifold G 2G_2 models and further pointers and see (Achary 98) for general discussion of orbifolds with G 2G_2-structure.


The KK-compactification of 11d supergravity of fibers of special holonomy was originally considered in

Specifically string phenomenology for the case of compactification on G2-manifolds (or rather orbifolds ) goes back to

See also

Discussion of Freund-Rubin compactification on 4×X 7\mathbb{R}^4 \times X_7 “with flux”, hence non-vanishing supergravity C-field and how they preserve one supersymmetry if X 7X_7 is of weak G2 holonomy with λ\lambda = cosmological constant = C-field strength on 4\mathbb{R}^4 is in

  • Adel Bilal, J.-P. Derendinger, K. Sfetsos, (Weak) G 2G_2 Holonomy from Self-duality, Flux and Supersymmetry, Nucl.Phys. B628 (2002) 112-132 (arXiv:hep-th/0111274)

  • Thomas House, Andrei Micu, M-theory Compactifications on Manifolds with G 2G_2 Structure (arXiv:hep-th/0412006)

Survey and further discussion includes

  • Michael Duff, M-theory on manifolds of G2 holonomy: the first twenty years (arXiv:hep-th/0201062)

  • Sergei Gukov, M-theory on manifolds with exceptional holonomy, Fortschr. Phys. 51 (2003), 719–731 (pdf)

  • Bobby Acharya, M Theory, G 2G_2-manifolds and Four Dimensional Physics, Classical and Quantum Gravity Volume 19 Number 22, 2002 (pdf)

  • Adil Belhaj, M-theory on G2 manifolds and the method of (p, q) brane webs (2004) (web)

  • Adam B. Barrett, M-Theory on Manifolds with G 2G_2 Holonomy (arXiv:hep-th/0612096)

  • James Halverson, David Morrison, The Landscape of M-theory Compactifications on Seven-Manifolds with G 2G_2 Holonomy (arXiv:1412.4123)

The corresponding membrane instanton corrections to the superpotential? are discussed in

The hierarchy problem in the context of G 2G_2-compactifications is discussed in

A survey of the corresponding string phenomenology is in

  • Bobby Acharya, G 2G_2-manifolds at the CERN Large Hadron collider and in the Galaxy, talk at G 2G_2-days (2012) (pdf)

Revised on January 29, 2015 09:19:06 by Urs Schreiber (