nLab Seiberg-Witten invariant

Contents

Context

Quantum field theory

Super-Geometry

Contents

Idea

The Seiberg-Witten invariants are invariants for certain 4-manifolds (with b 2 +−b 1b_2^+-b_1 odd and b 2 +≥2b_2^+\geq 2 for the Betti numbers) and spinᶜ structures on them. Their definition is based on the moduli space of the Seiberg-Witten equations, which is usually compact unlike the moduli space of the Yang-Mills equations, which first requires compactification. Seiberg-Witten invariants have therefore turned out to often be both easier in calculations and yielding stronger results than Donaldson invariants.

Basics

Let MM be a compact orientable Riemannian 4-manifold with a Riemannian metric gg and spinᶜ structure 𝔰\mathfrak{s}. Both always exist. In particular the latter is a lift of the classifying map τ:M→BSO(4)\tau\colon M\rightarrow BSO(4) of the tangent bundle TM≅τ *γ ℝ 4TM\cong\tau^*\gamma_\mathbb{R}^4 to a map 𝔰:M→BSpin c(4)\mathfrak{s}\colon M\rightarrow BSpin^\mathrm{c}(4). Because of the exceptional isomorphism:

Spin c(4)≅U(2)× U(1)U(2)={A ±∈U(2)|det(A −)=det(A +)} Spin^\mathrm{c}(4) \cong U(2)\times_{U(1)}U(2) =\{A^\pm\in U(2)|det(A^-)=det(A^+)\}

the spinᶜ structure 𝔰\mathfrak{s} consists of two complex plane bundles W ±↠MW^\pm\twoheadrightarrow M, called associated spinor bundles, with same determinant line bundle L=det(W ±)L=det(W^\pm). Since it preserves the first Chern class one has c 1(L)=c 1(W ±)∈H 2(M,ℤ)c_1(L)=c_1(W^\pm)\in H^2(M,\mathbb{Z}). Furthermore let W=W −⊕W +W=W^-\oplus W^+ be the Whitney sum of the spinor bundles.

Seiberg-Witten invariants

Let ℳ M,𝔰,g,η SW\mathcal{M}_{M,\mathfrak{s},g,\eta}^\mathrm{SW} (or just ℳ\mathcal{M} in the following) be the moduli space of the perturbed Seiberg-Witten equations, hence the space of its solution up to gauge, depending on the manifold MM, the spinᶜ structure 𝔰\mathfrak{s}, the metric gg and the disturbation η\eta. Using the Atiyah-Singer index theorem, its dimension is given by the Euler characteristic and the signature of the underlying manifold as:

dimℳ=14(c 1(L) 2−2χ(M)−3σ(M)) \dim\mathcal{M} =\frac{1}{4}\left( c_1(L)^2 -2\chi(M) -3\sigma(M) \right)

If the right expression is positive. Otherwise the moduli space is empty.

The group 𝒢=C ∞(M,U(1))\mathcal{G}=C^\infty(M,U(1)) and its subgroup 𝒢 0={u∈𝒢|u(x 0)=1}\mathcal{G}_0=\{u\in\mathcal{G}|u(x_0)=1\} with a basepoint x 0∈Mx_0\in M act on the moduli space. The canonical projection ℳ/𝒢 0→ℳ/𝒢\mathcal{M}/\mathcal{G}_0\rightarrow\mathcal{M}/\mathcal{G} is a principal U(1)-bundles with Euler class e∈H 2(M,ℤ)e\in H^2(M,\mathbb{Z}).

If b 2 +(M)−b 1(M)b_2^+(M)-b_1(M) is odd, then dimℳ=2ddim\mathcal{M}=2d is even and the Seiberg-Witten invariant can be defined as:

SW(M,𝔰,g,η)≔∫ ℳe d∈ℤ. SW(M,\mathfrak{s},g,\eta) \coloneqq\int_{\mathcal{M}}e^d \in\mathbb{Z}.

If b 2 +(M)≥2b_2^+(M)\geq 2, then SW(M,𝔰)≔SW(M,𝔰,g,η)SW(M,\mathfrak{s})\coloneqq SW(M,\mathfrak{s},g,\eta) is independent of the metric gg and the disturbation η\eta. With the space Spin c(M)≅H 2(M,ℤ)Spin^\mathrm{c}(M)\cong H^2(M,\mathbb{Z}) of spinᶜ structures, for which the isomorphism is given by the first Chern class, one can express the Seiberg-Witten invariant as a map:

SW:Spin c(M)≅H 2(M,ℤ)→ℤ. SW\colon Spin^\mathrm{c}(M)\cong H^2(M,\mathbb{Z})\rightarrow\mathbb{Z}.

A similar map with the choice of a fundamental class [M]∈H 4(M,ℤ)≅ℤ[M]\in H_4(M,\mathbb{Z})\cong\mathbb{Z}, which is a generator, is the intersection form H 2(M,ℤ)→ℤ,c↦⟨c 2,[M]⟩H^2(M,\mathbb{Z})\rightarrow\mathbb{Z},c\mapsto\langle c^2,[M]\rangle, which is essential for the classification of 4-manifolds.

A spinᶜ structure 𝔰∈Spin c(M)\mathfrak{s}\in Spin^\mathrm{c}(M), or alternatively its corresponding cohomology class c 1(L)∈H 2(M,ℤ)c_1(L)\in H^2(M,\mathbb{Z}), with SW(M,𝔰)≠0SW(M,\mathfrak{s})\neq 0 is called basic class. Hence the basic classes are the support of the Seiberg-Witten invariant and there always exist only finitely many. Every basic class fulfills:

c 2≥2χ(M)+3σ(M). c^2 \geq 2\chi(M) +3\sigma(M).

Properties

Proposition

On a smooth 4-manifold MM with b 2 +(M)=1b_2^+(M)=1, which admits a Riemannian metric of positive scalar curvature, all Seiberg-Witten invariants vanish.

(Nicolaescu 00, Crl. 2.3.8)

Proposition

Let MM be a closed oriented Riemannian 4-manifold with b 2 +(M)≥2b_2^+(M)\geq 2.

(Nicolaescu 00, Crl. 3.3.33)

A combination of both previous results shows that if MM has a Riemannian metric of positive scalar curvature, it doesn’t admit symplectic structures.

Proposition

For two compact oriented Riemannian 4-manifolds MM and NN with b 2 +(M),b 2 +(N)≥1b_2^+(M),b_2^+(N)\geq 1, one has:

SW M#N(𝔰)=0 SW_{M#N}(\mathfrak{s}) =0

for all spinᶜ structures 𝔰\mathfrak{s}.

(Nicolaescu 00, Thrm. 4.6.1)

A combination of both previous results shows that symplectic manifolds don’t decompose as a connected sum M#NM#N with b 2 +(M),b 2 +(N)≥1b_2^+(M),b_2^+(N)\geq 1. (Nicolaescu 00, Crl. 4.6.2) Since the classification of 4-manifolds is extremely difficult and still unresolved, many attempts have therefore focussed on symplectic manifolds.

Let 𝔰 n\mathfrak{s}_n be the spinᶜ structure on the orientation-reveresed second complex projective space ℂP 2¯\overline{\mathbb{C}P^2} with c 1(𝔰 n)=(2n+1)c 1(S 5)c_1(\mathfrak{s}_n)=(2n+1)c_1(S^5) (with the latter being the first Chern class of the principal U(1)-bundle S 5↠ℂP 2S^5\twoheadrightarrow\mathbb{C}P^2 and a generator c 1(S 5)∈H 2(ℂP 2,ℤ)≅ℤc_1(S^5)\in H^2(\mathbb{C}P^2,\mathbb{Z})\cong\mathbb{Z}).

Proposition

(Blow-up formula) For a compact orientable Riemannian 4-manifold MM with a spinᶜ structure 𝔰\mathfrak{s}, one has:

|SW M#ℂP 2¯,𝔰#𝔰 n|={0 dimℳ M,𝔰<±n(n+1) |SW M(𝔰)| dimℳ M,𝔰≥n(n+1) |SW_{M#\overline{\mathbb{C}P^2},\mathfrak{s}#\mathfrak{s}_n}| =\begin{cases} 0 & dim\mathcal{M}_{M,\mathfrak{s}}\lt\pm n(n+1) \\ |SW_M(\mathfrak{s})| & dim\mathcal{M}_{M,\mathfrak{s}}\geq n(n+1) \end{cases}

(Nicolaescu 00, Thrm. 4.6.7)

Proposition

For a Kähler surface? MM with canonical spinᶜ structure 𝔰 0\mathfrak{s}_0, one has:

SW M(𝔰 0)=1; SW_M(\mathfrak{s}_0) =1;
SW M +(𝔰 0)=1 SW_M^+(\mathfrak{s}_0) =1

for b 2 +(M)≥2b_2^+(M)\geq 2 and b 2 +(M)=1b_2^+(M)=1, respectively. If MM is a K3 surface, then 𝔰¯ 0=𝔰 0\overline\mathfrak{s}_0=\mathfrak{s}_0 and it is the only basic class.

(Nicolaescu 00, Thrm. 3.3.2 & Crl. 3.3.3)

Articles about Seiberg-Witten theory:

References

On Seiberg-Witten invariants and symplectic manifolds:

See also:

Last revised on April 25, 2026 at 09:31:03. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.