natural deduction metalanguage, practical foundations
type theory (dependent, intensional, observational type theory, homotopy type theory)
computational trinitarianism =
propositions as types +programs as proofs +relation type theory/category theory
Background
Basic concepts
equivalences in/of -categories
Universal constructions
Local presentation
Theorems
Extra stuff, structure, properties
Models
In homotopy type theory, types represent -groupoids, so there should be something similar to enriched -groupoids in homotopy type theory. The following definition is an experimental definition of such an object:
Let be the subtype of types in a type universe which satisfy a certain predicate : for all types , there is a term .
Then a type is -enriched if for all terms and , there is a dependent term , where is the identity type of and in .
One could define -enriched types, which are types whose identity types are all abelian groups (usually defined with a predicate ).
Similarly, sets are -enriched types, and -types are Type-enriched types.
A (extended) lower Dedekind cut could be defined as a set with an injection which satisfy certain axioms, which are detailed in the article on Dedekind cuts. Then, one could define a (extended) Richman premetric space as a type whose identity types are (extended) lower Dedekind cuts, which in classical mathematics is the same as a (extended) metric space.
Under the relation between type theory and category theory, enriched types should correspond to enriched -groupoids in higher category theory.
Last revised on June 16, 2022 at 11:25:59. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.