nLab essentially small type




Type theory

natural deduction metalanguage, practical foundations

  1. type formation rule
  2. term introduction rule
  3. term elimination rule
  4. computation rule

type theory (dependent, intensional, observational type theory, homotopy type theory)

syntax object language

computational trinitarianism =
propositions as types +programs as proofs +relation type theory/category theory

logicset theory (internal logic of)category theorytype theory
predicatefamily of setsdisplay morphismdependent type
proofelementgeneralized elementterm/program
cut rulecomposition of classifying morphisms / pullback of display mapssubstitution
introduction rule for implicationcounit for hom-tensor adjunctionlambda
elimination rule for implicationunit for hom-tensor adjunctionapplication
cut elimination for implicationone of the zigzag identities for hom-tensor adjunctionbeta reduction
identity elimination for implicationthe other zigzag identity for hom-tensor adjunctioneta conversion
truesingletonterminal object/(-2)-truncated objecth-level 0-type/unit type
falseempty setinitial objectempty type
proposition, truth valuesubsingletonsubterminal object/(-1)-truncated objecth-proposition, mere proposition
logical conjunctioncartesian productproductproduct type
disjunctiondisjoint union (support of)coproduct ((-1)-truncation of)sum type (bracket type of)
implicationfunction set (into subsingleton)internal hom (into subterminal object)function type (into h-proposition)
negationfunction set into empty setinternal hom into initial objectfunction type into empty type
universal quantificationindexed cartesian product (of family of subsingletons)dependent product (of family of subterminal objects)dependent product type (of family of h-propositions)
existential quantificationindexed disjoint union (support of)dependent sum ((-1)-truncation of)dependent sum type (bracket type of)
logical equivalencebijection setobject of isomorphismsequivalence type
support setsupport object/(-1)-truncationpropositional truncation/bracket type
n-image of morphism into terminal object/n-truncationn-truncation modality
equalitydiagonal function/diagonal subset/diagonal relationpath space objectidentity type/path type
completely presented setsetdiscrete object/0-truncated objecth-level 2-type/set/h-set
setset with equivalence relationinternal 0-groupoidBishop set/setoid with its pseudo-equivalence relation an actual equivalence relation
equivalence class/quotient setquotientquotient type
inductioncolimitinductive type, W-type, M-type
higher inductionhigher colimithigher inductive type
-0-truncated higher colimitquotient inductive type
coinductionlimitcoinductive type
presettype without identity types
set of truth valuessubobject classifiertype of propositions
domain of discourseuniverseobject classifiertype universe
modalityclosure operator, (idempotent) monadmodal type theory, monad (in computer science)
linear logic(symmetric, closed) monoidal categorylinear type theory/quantum computation
proof netstring diagramquantum circuit
(absence of) contraction rule(absence of) diagonalno-cloning theorem
synthetic mathematicsdomain specific embedded programming language

homotopy levels




In dependent type theory, given a Russell universe UU, a type AA is purely essentially UU-small if the universe has an element B:UB:U and an equivalence p:ABp:A \simeq B.

A type AA is merely essentially UU-small if there merely exists an element B:UB:U such that ABA \simeq B:

isEssentiallySmall U(A)B:U.AB\mathrm{isEssentiallySmall}_U(A) \coloneqq \exists B:U.A \simeq B

Similarly, given a Tarski universe (U,T)(U, T), a type AA is purely essentially UU-small if the universe has an element B:UB:U and an equivalence p:AT(B)p:A \simeq T(B).

A type AA is merely essentially UU-small if there merely exists an element B:UB:U such that AT(B)A \simeq T(B):

isEssentiallySmall U(A)B:U.AT(B)\mathrm{isEssentiallySmall}_U(A) \coloneqq \exists B:U.A \simeq T(B)


For a single universe UU, propositional resizing states that the type of all h-propositions in a universe is essentially UU-small.

Making all essentially small types small

Given a Russell universe UU, one could make all essentially UU-small types actually small types by the following inference rules:

ΓAtypeΓwitnSmall A:B:U.ABΓA:U\frac{\Gamma \vdash A \; \mathrm{type} \quad \Gamma \vdash \mathrm{witnSmall}_A:\exists B:U.A \simeq B}{\Gamma \vdash A:U}

See also


Last revised on November 27, 2023 at 16:43:58. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.