natural deduction metalanguage, practical foundations
type theory (dependent, intensional, observational type theory, homotopy type theory)
= + +
/ | -/ | |
, | ||
of / of | ||
for | for hom-tensor adjunction | |
introduction rule for | for hom-tensor adjunction | |
( of) | ( of) | |
into | into | |
( of) | ( of) | |
, , | ||
higher | ||
/ | -// | |
/ | ||
, () | , | |
(, ) | / | |
(absence of) | (absence of) | |
Classical propositional calculus has an algebraic model, namely a Boolean algebra. With a bit of imagination, one can give it a combinatorial model in the line of Kripke semantics. As this ordinary propositional logic has no modal operators, then the corresponding frames have no relations, so are just sets. If $W$ is such a set, (of worlds), a valuation $V: Prop \to 2^W$ just assigns to each $p \in Prop$ and $w\in W$ a truth value, $\top$ or $\bot$, (true or false). We know however that there is a Boolean algebra structure around in that power set $2^W$ and the semantics extends the assignment given by $V$ to a map of algebras, from the term algebra based on the basic propositional language to the Boolean algebra of subsets of $W$. That is just to say that it builds up that extension of $V$ bit-by-bit on the terms. This gives an algebraic interpretation or representation of the terms of the logic in terms of the algebra of subsets of $W$, in other words an algebraic semantics.
Modal logics also have an algebraic semantics based on a Boolean algebra, but with additional operators that model the modal operators. This is as well as the geometric semantics using frames.
We will, here, consider a Boolean algebra, $\mathbb{B }$, as an algebra, and in the notation,
so, for example, for a set $S$, the power set Boolean algebra will be
where $-A$ is shorthand for the complement, $S- A$, of $A$.
The operators that we need to add into the Boolean algebras do not always preserve all the structure:
A function, $m : B\to B$ is called an operator on the Boolean algebra, $\mathbb{B}$, if it is additive
The operator, $m$, is called normal if $m0=0$.
Any operator, $m$, in this sense has a dual $l : B\to B$ given by
As $m$ is additive, $l$ is multiplicative
and has $l(1) = 1$ if $m$ is normal.
One of the myriad notations used for the generic modal operators $\lozenge$ and $\Box$, are $M$ and $L$, whence $M$ is ‘possibility, and $L$ is ‘necessity“, and these gave the names to the operators above.
A Boolean algebra with operators, or BAO, of type $n$ consists of a Boolean algebra $\mathbb{B}$, and a set, $m_i$, $i = 1,\ldots, n$ of operators on $B$.
BAOs are sometimes called modal algebras, especially in the case that $n = 1$. The term polymodal algebra is then used for the general case.
There is no need in the definition of BAOs to restrict to finitely many operators nor to have all the operators being unary. The general theory is discussed in the Survey by Goldblatt (see the references).
BAOs from frames.
Let $\mathfrak{F} = (W ,R)$ be a frame. We define on the power set Boolean algebra, $\mathbb{P}(W)$, the operator $m$ by, if $T\subseteq W$,
It perhaps pays to interpret this in the case where $R$ is a preorder and when it is an equivalence relation. In the first case, this will be the set of states less than or equal to something in $T$, in the second it is the union of all equivalence classes that contain an element of $T$.
The function $m$ is a normal operator.
The proof is a simple manipulation of the definitions.
The dual operator $l$ is given by $l(T) = \{w\in W\mid \forall t\in T \neg R w t\}$. (Again look at this for the preorder and equivalence frame cases.)
It is easy to extend this example to $\mathfrak{F} = (W ,R_1,\ldots, R_n)$ with the result being a BAO of type $n$.
The Lindenbaum-Tarski algebra of a modal logic.
Suppose $\Lambda \subseteq \mathcal{L}_\omega(n)$ is a normal modal logic, then its Lindenbaum-Tarski algebra has a natural BAO structure, for which see the above page.
The following is a list of some of the main equationally defined classes of (poly)modal algebras. (For convenience each has been given a separate entry.)
General books on modal logics that include information on algebraic models include:
Patrick Blackburn, M. de Rijke and Y. Venema, Modal Logic, Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 53, 2001.
Marcus Kracht, Tools and Techniques in Modal Logic, Studies in Logic and the Foundation of Mathematics, 142, Elsevier, 1999.
There is an excellent short survey article (versions of which are available on the web):
IGPL, 8, (2000) pages 393–450, Special Issue on Algebraic Logic, edited by Istvan Nemeti and Ildiko Sain.
Discussion of modal logic in terms of coalgebra and terminal coalgebra of an endofunctor is in
Last revised on November 3, 2012 at 22:37:39. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.