nLab CW-pair

Redirected from "CW pair".
Contents

Context

Topology

topology (point-set topology, point-free topology)

see also differential topology, algebraic topology, functional analysis and topological homotopy theory

Introduction

Basic concepts

Universal constructions

Extra stuff, structure, properties

Examples

Basic statements

Theorems

Analysis Theorems

topological homotopy theory

Contents

Idea

In algebraic topology, by a CW-pair (X,A)(X,A) is meant a CW-complex XX equipped with a sub-complex inclusion AXA \hookrightarrow X.

The concept appears prominently in the discussion of ordinary relative homology and generally in the Eilenberg-Steenrod axioms for generalized homology/generalized cohomology.

Properties

General

Proposition

For XX a CW complex, the inclusion AXA \hookrightarrow X of any subcomplex has an open neighbourhood in XX which is a deformation retract of AA. In particular such an inclusion is a good pair in the sense of relative homology.

For instance (Hatcher 2002, prop. A.5).

Proposition

For (X,A)(X,A) a CW-pair, then the AA-relative singular homology of XX coincides with the reduced singular homology of the quotient space X/AX/A:

H n(X,A)H˜ n(X/A). H_n(X , A) \simeq \tilde H_n(X/A) \,.

For instance (Hatcher 2002, prop. 2.22).

Proof

By assumption we can find a neighbourhood AjUXA \stackrel{j}{\to} U \hookrightarrow X such that AUA \hookrightarrow U has a deformation retract and hence in particular is a homotopy equivalence and so induces also isomorphisms on all singular homology groups.

It follows in particular that for all nn \in \mathbb{N} the canonical morphism H n(X,A)H n(id,j)H n(X,U)H_n(X,A) \stackrel{H_n(id,j)}{\to} H_n(X,U) is an isomorphism, by homotopy invariance of relative singular homology.

Given such UU we have an evident commuting diagram of pairs of topological spaces

Here the right vertical morphism is in fact a homeomorphism.

Applying relative singular homology to this diagram yields for each nn \in \mathbb{N} the commuting diagram of abelian groups

Here the left horizontal morphisms are the above isomorphims induced from the deformation retract. The right horizontal morphisms are isomorphisms by excision and the right vertical morphism is an isomorphism since it is induced by a homeomorphism. Hence the left vertical morphism is an isomorphism (2-out-of-3 for isomorphisms).

Collapsing contractible subcomplexes

Proposition

If the sub-complex AA is contractible, then the quotient coprojection is a homotopy equivalence.

*AXX/A. \ast \overset{\sim}{\longrightarrow} A \phantom{---} \Rightarrow \phantom{---} X \overset{\sim}{\longrightarrow} X/A \,.

(e.g. Hatcher p 11).

Example

Let XX be the pushout (in Top) which attaches an arc — identified as AXA \subset X — to the 2-sphere, connecting a pair of distinct points:

(from Hatcher 2002)

and let BB be any arc inside S 2S^2 connecting these two distinct points. Then Prop. gives homotopy equivalences

S 2/S 0=X/AXX/B=S 2S 1. S^2 / S^0 \,=\, X/A \overset{\sim}{\longrightarrow} X \overset{\sim}{\longrightarrow} X/B \,=\, S^2 \vee S^1 \,.

(e.g. Hatcher 2002 p 11).

In generalization of this example:

Example

For Σ g,n 2Σ g 2{s 1,,s n}\Sigma^2_{g,n} \,\coloneqq\, \Sigma^2_g \setminus \{s_1, \cdots, s_n\} the result of subjecting a closed surface Σ g 2\Sigma^2_g to n2n \geq 2 punctures, the one-point compactification (Σ g,n 2) *\big(\Sigma^2_{g,n}\big)^\ast is homotopy equivalent to the wedge sum of the original surface with n1n-1 circles:

(Σ g,n 2) *Σ g 2 n1S 1. \big(\Sigma^2_{g,n}\big)^\ast \;\simeq\; \Sigma^2_g \,\vee\, \textstyle{\bigvee_{n-1}} S^1 \,.

This follows from Prop. by generalizing Ex. as follows: Instead of a single arc, take AA and BB there to each be, in themselves, the linear graph consisting of n1n-1 arcs (edges) and observe that that after identifying the vertices all with each other, this gives the wedge sum of (n1)(n-1) circles.

Then take XΣ g 2AX \coloneqq \Sigma^2_g \cup A to be the result of attaching this graph to the closed surface by gluing the vertices to the marked points (the would-be punctures) and observe that (Σ g,n 2) *=X/A(\Sigma^2_{g,n})^\ast = X/A. With BB similarly identified as the corresponding graph but now embedded inside Σ g 2\Sigma^2_g, we have X/B=Σ g 2 n1S 1X/B = \Sigma^2_g \,\vee\, \textstyle{\bigvee_{n-1}} S^1.

References

Last revised on January 22, 2025 at 11:33:07. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.