basics
Examples
(…)
Due to the Meissner-Ochsenfeld effect, a superconductor placed in a sufficiently small external magnetic field $H_{ext} \lt H_{c_1}$ (aligned along some axis) “expels” that field , making the total magnetic field in the bulk of the superconductor vanish. However, as the ambient magnetic field exceeds a critical value $H_{c_1}$, this behaviour changes:
for type I superconductors, the superconducting state simply breaks down as $H_{ext} \gt H_{c_1}$ and the ambient magnetic field fully penetrates the material as for any normal conductor;
for type II superconductors the superconducting state eventually also breaks down as $H_{ext} \gt H_{c_2} \gt H_{c_1}$, but there is an intermediate parameter region $H_{c_1} \lt H_{ext} \lt H_{c_2}$ where both regimes mix:
In this mixed regime, a finite number of elementary units of magnetic flux enter the superconductor, carried by little flux tubes inside vortices of electric currents: vortex strings (about a micron in diameter, e.g. Chapman 00, p. 559). Each vortex core carries one unit of magnetic flux – also called a fluxon – while at some small finite distance away from all vortices, the bulk magnetic flux in the superconductor still vanishes (mathematically: it vanishes at infinity):
At sufficiently large density these vortices arrange into hexagonal patterns, first described by Abrikosov 57, whence also known as Abrikosov vortices.
This flux quantization in type II superconductors is traditionally explained via the effective field theory provided by the Landau-Ginzburg model; the derivation may be found reviewed in Chapman 00 (Section 2, culminating in (2.33)).
But, as indicated a little more explicitly in Alvarez-Gaumé 98 (Section IV.B, culminating below IV.11), the flux quantization as such is mathematically a direct consequence of the global topological nature of the electromagnetic field, the argument being the direct 2-dimensional analog of the quantization of instantons in QCD in 4d (see also at SU(2)-Instantons – From the correct maths to the traditional physics story) and in fact is but a slight variation of the argument for Dirac charge quantization of magnetic monopoles:
Namely, the electromagnetic field is a connection on a circle bundle, and hence the cohomology classifying space for the topological class of the electromagnetic field is the classifying space $B \mathrm{U}(1)$ of the circle group, which, being an Eilenberg-MacLane space $K(\mathbb{Z},2)$, has second homotopy group the integers:
This implies that on every spacetime which looks, up to homotopy equivalence, like a 2-sphere to the electromagnetic field, the magnetic flux is identified with an element in the group of integers, hence is quantized in integral multiples of some unit flux.
For the case of a (hypothetical) magnetic monopole (e.g. a magnetically charged black hole), it is the spacetime around the monopole (the complement of its worldline $\mathbb{R}^{0,1}$ in the ambient (asymtptotically) Minkowski spacetime $\mathbb{R}^{3,1}$) which has the homotopy type of a 2-sphere $\mathbb{R}^{3,1} \setminus \mathbb{R}^{0,1} \,\simeq\, \mathbb{R}^{0,1} \times \mathbb{R}_{rad} \times S^2$; this implies the Dirac charge quantization of the magnetic monopole‘s magnetic charge:
For the case of the type II superconductor it is instead the transversal vanishing at infinity of the magnetic field (i.e. the Meissner-Ochsenfeld effect away from the vortices) which implies that the classifying map of the electromagnetic field sees not the full transversal Euclidean plane $\mathbb{R}^2$ but its one-point compactification $\big( \mathbb{R}^2 \big)^{cpt} \,\simeq\, S^2$, which introduces an effective 2-sphere topology onto spacetime (same as the 3-sphere in the discussion of Skyrmions and the 4-sphere in the discussion of instantons): $\mathbb{R}^{1,1} \times \big( \mathbb{R}^2 \big)^{cpt} \,\simeq\, \mathbb{R}^{1,1} \times S^2$. This implies the superconductor’s magnetic flux quantization:
The argument that is given in most references, via consideration of the period of the vector potential on a large circle around the superconductor (e.g. Timm 20, Section 5.3), is secretly just the analysis of this picture through the clutching construction (the direct 2d analog of the discussion at SU(2)-Instantons – From the correct maths to the traditional physics story).
Review
S. J. Chapman, A Hierarchy of Models for Type-II Superconductors, IAM Review Vol. 42, No. 4 (2000), pp. 555-598 (jstor:2653134)
Carsten Timm, Theory of Superconductivity, 2020 (pdf)
See also:
Wikipedia, Superconductivity
Wikipedia, Meissner effect
Textbook account in the context of quantum materials and topological insulators:
Introducing Landau-Ginzburg models in superconductivity:
Introducing the dimer model:
Original articles:
Alexei Abrikosov, On the Magnetic properties of superconductors of the second group, Sov. Phys. JETP 5 (1957) 1174-1182, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 32 (1957) 1442-1452 (spire:9138)
Alexei Abrikosov, The magnetic properties of superconducting alloys, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids Volume 2, Issue 3, 1957, Pages 199-208 (doi:10.1016/0022-3697(57)90083-5)
Lecture notes:
See also
First experimental detection of flux quantization in superconductors:
Bascom S. Deaver, Jr., William M. Fairbank, Experimental Evidence for Quantized Flux in Superconducting Cylinders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 43 – Published 15 (1961) (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.7.43)
R. Doll, M. Näbauer, Experimental Proof of Magnetic Flux Quantization in a Superconducting Ring, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 51 (1961) (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.7.51)
More on the experimental detection magnetic flux quantization and vortices:
More theoretically flavored discussion of the flux quantization mechanism:
On the vortex flux tubes as dynamical vortex strings:
Holger Bech Nielsen, Poul Olesen, Vortex-line models for dual strings, Nuclear Physics B Volume 61, 24 September 1973, Pages 45-61 (doi:10.1016/0550-3213(73)90350-7)
David Tong, Quantum Vortex Strings: A Review, Annals Phys. 324:30-52, 2009 (arXiv:0809.5060)
On superfluidity/superconductivity of anyons:
On realizing qbits and quantum gates (hence quantum computation) via quantum states of magnetic flux through (Josephson junctions in) superconductors, manipulated via electromagnetic pulses:
M. H. Devoret, A. Wallraff, J. M. Martinis, Superconducting Qubits: A Short Review $[$arXiv:cond-mat/0411174$]$
John Clarke, Frank K. Wilhelm, Superconducting quantum bits, Nature 453 (2008) 1031–1042 $[$doi:10.1038/nature07128$]$
Jerry Moy Chow, Quantum Information Processing with Superconducting Qubits (2010) $[$pdf$]$
Jay M. Gambetta, Jerry M. Chow, Matthias Steffen, Building logical qubits in a superconducting quantum computing system, npj Quantum Information 3 2 (2017) $[$doi:10.1038/s41534-016-0004-0$]$
Morten Kjaergaard et al. Superconducting Qubits: Current State of Play, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 11 (2019) 369-395 $[$doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031119-050605$]$
He-Liang Huang, Dachao Wu, Daojin Fan, Xiaobo Zhu, Superconducting Quantum Computing: A Review, Science China Information Sciences 63 8 (2020) 1-32 $[$arXiv:2006.10433, doi:10.1007/s11432-020-2881-9$]$
S. Kwon et al., Gate-based superconducting quantum computing, Journal of Applied Physics 129 (2021) 041102 $[$doi:10.1063/5.0029735$]$
Fine detail of the pulse control:
M. Werninghaus, D. J. Egger, F. Roy, S. Machnes, F. K. Wilhelm, S. Filipp: Leakage reduction in fast superconducting qubit gates via optimal control, npj Quantum Information 7 14 (2021) $[$doi:10.1038/s41534-020-00346-2$]$
M. Carroll, S. Rosenblatt, P. Jurcevic, I. Lauer & A. Kandala. Dynamics of superconducting qubit relaxation times, npj Quantum Information 8 132 (2022) $[$doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00643-y$]$
Elisha Siddiqui Matekole, Yao-Lung L. Fang, Meifeng Lin, Methods and Results for Quantum Optimal Pulse Control on Superconducting Qubit Systems, 2022 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops (2022) $[$arXiv:2202.03260, doi:10.1109/IPDPSW55747.2022.00102$]$
Corrections due to quasiparticle-excitations:
On anyon-excitations in topological superconductors.
via Majorana zero modes:
Original proposal:
Review:
Sankar Das Sarma, Michael Freedman, Chetan Nayak, Majorana Zero Modes and Topological Quantum Computation, npj Quantum Information 1, 15001 (2015) (nature:npjqi20151)
Nur R. Ayukaryana, Mohammad H. Fauzi, Eddwi H. Hasdeo, The quest and hope of Majorana zero modes in topological superconductor for fault-tolerant quantum computing: an introductory overview (arXiv:2009.07764)
Yusuke Masaki, Takeshi Mizushima, Muneto Nitta, Non-Abelian Anyons and Non-Abelian Vortices in Topological Superconductors [arXiv:2301.11614]
Further development:
via Majorana zero modes restricted to edges of topological insulators:
Discussion of superconductivity via AdS/CFT in condensed matter physics:
Sean Hartnoll, Christopher Herzog, Gary Horowitz, Building an AdS/CFT superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101:031601, 2008 (arXiv:0803.3295)
Alberto Salvio, Superconductivity, Superfluidity and Holography (arXiv:1301.0201)
Rong-Gen Cai, Li Li, Li-Fang Li, Run-Qiu Yang, Introduction to Holographic Superconductor Models, Sci China-Phys Mech Astron, 2015, 58(6):060401 (arXiv:1502.00437)
Sean Hartnoll, Andrew Lucas, Subir Sachdev, Section 6.3 of: Holographic quantum matter, MIT Press 2018 (arXiv:1612.07324, publisher)
Yiqian Chen, Xiaobo Guo, Peng Wang, Holographic Superconductors in a Non-minimally Coupled Einstein-Maxwell-scalar Model (arXiv:2111.03810)
Chuan-Yin Xia, Hua-Bi Zeng, Yu Tian, Chiang-Mei Chen, Jan Zaanen, Holographic Abrikosov lattice: vortex matter from black hole (arXiv:2111.07718)
Dong Wang, Xiongying Qiao, Qiyuan Pan, Chuyu Lai, Jiliang Jing, Holographic entanglement entropy and complexity for the excited states of holographic superconductors [arXiv:2301.00513]
(in relation to holographic entanglement entropy)
Via topological phases of matter:
Last revised on March 5, 2023 at 07:16:59. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.