The AdS-CFT correspondence applies exactly only to a few highly symmetric quantum field theories, notably to N=4 D=4 super Yang-Mills theory. However, it does not completely break away from these special points in field theory space, but applies in some approximation and/or with suitable modifications on the gravity-side of the correspondence.
For instance quantum chromodynamics (one sector of the standard model of particle physics) is crucially different from but still similar enough to N=4 D=4 super Yang-Mills theory that some of its observables, in particular otherwise intractable non-perturbative effects, have been argued to be usefully approximated by AdS-CFT-type dual gravity-observables, for instance the shear viscosity of the quark-gluon plasma. This is hence also called the AdS/QCD correspondence.
Similarly, as far as systems in condensed matter physics are described well by some effective field theory, one may ask whether this, in turn, is usefully related to gravity on some anti de-Sitter spacetime and use this to study the solid state system, notably its non-perturbative effects.
Andreas Karch writes here:
These anomalous transport coefficients have first been calculated in AdS/CFT. The relevant references are [8], [9] and [10] in the Son/Surowka paper. In the AdS/CFT calculations these particular transport coefficients only arise due to Chern-Simons terms, which are the bulk manifestation of the field theory anomalies. At that point it was obvious to many of us that there should be a purely field theory based calculation, only using anomalies, that can derive these terms. Son and Surowka knew about this. They were sitting next door to me when they started these calculations. Many of us tried to find these purely field theory based arguments and failed. Son and Surowka succeeded.
If you ask anyone serious about applying AdS/CFT to strongly coupled field theories why they are doing this, they would (hopefully) give you an answer along the lines of “AdS/CFT provides us with toy models of strongly coupled dynamics. While the field theories that have classical AdS duals are rather special, we can still learn important qualitative insights and find new ways to think about strongly coupled field theories.” Once AdS/CFT stumbles on a new phenomenon in these solvable toy models, we want to go back to see whether we can understand it without the crutch of having to rely on AdS/CFT. Any result that only applies in theories with holographic dual is somewhat limited in its applications. In this sense, anomalous transport is a poster child for what AdS/CFT can be used for: a new phenomenon that had been missed completely by people studying field theory gets uncovered by studying these toy models. Once we knew what to look for, a purely field theoretic argument was found that made the AdS/CFT derivation obsolete.
This is applied AdS/CFT as it should be. Solvable examples exhibit new connections which then can be proven to be correct more generally and are not limited to the toy models that were used to uncover them.
Similarly Hartnoll-Lucas-Sachdev 16, p. 8:
Our main objective here is to make clear that explicit examples of the duality are known in various dimensions and that they are found by using string theory as a bridge between quantum field theory and gravity.
Discussion of renormalization and entangled states of non-perturbative effects in solid state physics proceeds via tensor networks (Swingle 09, Swingle 13) and the resulting discovery of the relation to holographic entanglement entropy.
In this context, a tensor network is a string diagram with an attitude, in that it is (just) a string diagram, but with
the tensor product of all its external objects regarded as a space of states of a quantum system;
the element in that tensor product defined by the string diagram regarded a a state (wave function) of that quantum system.
For instance, if $\mathfrak{g}$ is a metric Lie algebra (with string diagram-notation as shown there), and with each tensor product-power of its dual vector space regarded as Hilbert space, hence as a space of quantum states, via the given inner product on $\mathfrak{g}$, then an example of a tree tensor network state is the following:
The quantum states arising this way are generically highly entangled: roughly they are the more entangled the more vertices there are in the corresponding tensor network.
Tree tensor network states in the form of Bruhat-Tits trees play a special role in the AdS/CFT correspondence, either as
a kind of lattice QFT-approximation to an actual boundary CFT quantum state,
as the p-adic geometric incarnation of anti de Sitter spacetime in the p-adic AdS/CFT correspondence,
as a reflection of actual crystal-site quantum states in AdS/CFT in solid state physics:
graphics from Sati-Schreiber 19c
For Bruhat-Tits tree tensor network states one finds that the holographic entanglement entropy of the tensor subspace associated with an interval on the boundary becomes proportional, for large number of vertices, to the hyperbolic bulk boundary length of the segment of the tree network that ends on this interval, according to the Ryu-Takayanagi formula (PYHP 15, Theorem 2). For more on this see below.
Textbooks:
Jan Zaanen, Yan Liu, Ya-Wen Sun, Koenraad Schalm, Holographic Duality in Condensed Matter Physics, Cambridge University Press 2015 (doi:10.1017/CBO9781139942492)
Sean Hartnoll, Andrew Lucas, Subir Sachdev, Holographic quantum matter, MIT Press 2018 (arXiv:1612.07324, publisher)
Reviews and lectures:
Sean Hartnoll, Lectures on holographic methods for condensed matter physics, Class. Quant. Grav. 26:224002, 2009 (arXiv:0903.3246)
A. Pires, AdS/CFT correspondence in condensed matter (arXiv:1006.5838)
Subir Sachdev, Condensed matter and AdS/CFT (arXiv:1002.2947)
K. Schalm and R. Davison, A simple introduction to AdS/CFT and its application to condensed matter physics, D-ITP Advanced Topics in Theoretical Physics Fall 2013, (pdf)
Andrea Amoretti, Condensed Matter Applications of AdS/CFT: Focusing on strange metals, 2017 (spire:1610363, pdf)
Hong Liu, Julian Sonner, Quantum many-body physics from a gravitational lens, Nature Rev.Phys. 2 (2020) 11, 615-633 (arXiv:2004.06159, doi:10.1038/s42254-020-0225-1)
More pointers:
Discussion of quantum chromodynamics via AdS/CFT in condensed matter physics (see also at AdS/QCD):
Yuri V. Kovchegov, AdS/CFT applications to relativistic heavy ion collisions: a brief review (arXiv:1112.5403)
Holography and Extreme Chromodynamics, Santiago de Compostela, July 2018
Discussion of superconductivity via AdS/CFT in condensed matter physics:
Sean Hartnoll, Christopher Herzog, Gary Horowitz, Building an AdS/CFT superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101:031601, 2008 (arXiv:0803.3295)
Alberto Salvio, Superconductivity, Superfluidity and Holography (arXiv:1301.0201)
Rong-Gen Cai, Li Li, Li-Fang Li, Run-Qiu Yang, Introduction to Holographic Superconductor Models, Sci China-Phys Mech Astron, 2015, 58(6):060401 (arXiv:1502.00437)
On strange metals, high $T_c$-superconductors and AdS/CMT duality:
Discussion of asymptotic boundaries of hyperbolic tensor networks as conformal quasicrystals:
Latham Boyle, Madeline Dickens, Felix Flicker, Conformal Quasicrystals and Holography, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011009 (2020) (arXiv:1805.02665)
Alexander Jahn, Zoltán Zimborás, Jens Eisert, Central charges of aperiodic holographic tensor network models (arXiv:1911.03485)
Proposed realization of aspects of p-adic AdS/CFT correspondence in solid-state physics:
Classification topological phases of matter (condensed matter with gapped Hamiltonians, topological insulators) by twisted equivariant topological K-theory:
Alexei Kitaev, Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors, talk at: L.D.Landau Memorial Conference “Advances in Theoretical Physics”, June 22-26, 2008, In:AIP Conference Proceedings 1134, 22 (2009) (arXiv:0901.2686, doi:10.1063/1.3149495)
Daniel Freed, Gregory Moore, Twisted equivariant matter, Ann. Henri Poincaré (2013) 14: 1927 (arXiv:1208.5055)
Guo Chuan Thiang, On the K-theoretic classification of topological phases of matter, Annales Henri Poincare 17(4) 757-794 (2016) (arXiv:1406.7366)
Guo Chuan Thiang, Topological phases: isomorphism, homotopy and K-theory, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 12 1550098 (2015) (arXiv:1412.4191)
Ralph M. Kaufmann, Dan Li, Birgit Wehefritz-Kaufmann, Topological insulators and K-theory (arXiv:1510.08001, spire:1401095/)
Charles Zhaoxi Xiong, Classification and Construction of Topological Phases of Quantum Matter (arXiv:1906.02892)
Via cobordism cohomology:
Anton Kapustin, Ryan Thorngren, Alex Turzillo, Zitao Wang, Electrons Fermionic Symmetry Protected Topological Phases and Cobordisms, JHEP 1512:052, 2015 (arXiv:1406.7329)
Daniel Freed, Michael Hopkins, Reflection positivity and invertible topological phases (arXiv:1604.06527)
Daniel Freed, Lectures on field theory and topology (cds:2699265)
Relation to the GSO projection:
Under AdS/CFT duality in solid state physics the K-theory-classification of topological phases of matter translates to the K-Theory classification of D-brane charge in string theory, allowing a dual description of the topological phases even at strong coupling via AdS/CFT duality:
Shinsei Ryu, Tadashi Takayanagi, Topological Insulators and Superconductors from D-branes, Phys. Lett. B693:175-179, 2010 (arXiv:1001.0763)
Carlos Hoyos-Badajoz, Kristan Jensen, Andreas Karch, A Holographic Fractional Topological Insulator, Phys. Rev. D82:086001, 2010 (arXiv:1007.3253)
Shinsei Ryu, Tadashi Takayanagi, Topological Insulators and Superconductors from String Theory, Phys. Rev. D82:086014, 2010 (arXiv:1007.4234)
Andreas Karch, Joseph Maciejko, Tadashi Takayanagi, Holographic fractional topological insulators in 2+1 and 1+1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 82, 126003 (2010) (arXiv:1009.2991)
Relation to Yang-Mills monopoles as Dp/D(p+2)-brane intersections and Yang-Mills instantons as Dp/D(p+4)-brane intersections:
Koji Hashimoto, Taro Kimura, Band spectrum is D-brane, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Volume 2016, Issue 1 (arXiv:1509.04676)
Charlotte Kristjansen, Gordon W. Semenoff, The D3-probe-D7 brane holographic fractional topological insulator, JHEP10 (2016) 079 (arXiv:1604.08548)
Last revised on February 12, 2021 at 11:12:03. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.