nLab co-binary Sullivan differential is Whitehead product

Context

Homotopy theory

homotopy theory, (∞,1)-category theory, homotopy type theory

flavors: stable, equivariant, rational, p-adic, proper, geometric, cohesive, directed

models: topological, simplicial, localic, …

see also algebraic topology

Introductions

Definitions

Paths and cylinders

Homotopy groups

Basic facts

Theorems

Lie theory

∞-Lie theory (higher geometry)

Background

Smooth structure

Higher groupoids

Lie theory

∞-Lie groupoids

∞-Lie algebroids

Formal Lie groupoids

Cohomology

Homotopy

Related topics

Examples

\infty-Lie groupoids

\infty-Lie groups

\infty-Lie algebroids

\infty-Lie algebras

Contents

Idea

We discuss (Prop. below) how the rationalization of the Whitehead product is the co-binary part of the Sullivan differential in rational homotopy theory.

Notation and conventions

We make explicit some notation and normalization conventions that enter the statement.

In the following, for WW a \mathbb{Z}-graded module, we write

WWSym 2(W)(WW)/(αβ(1) n αn ββα), W \wedge W \;\coloneqq\; Sym^2(W) \;\coloneqq\; \big( W \otimes W \big) / \big( \alpha \otimes \beta \sim (-1)^{ n_\alpha n_\beta } \beta \otimes \alpha \big) \,,

where on the right α,βW\alpha, \beta \in W are elements of homogeneous degree n α,n βn_\alpha, n_\beta \in \mathbb{Z}, respectively. The point is just to highlight that “()()(-)\wedge(-)” is not to imply here a degree shift of the generators (as it typically does in the usual notation for Grassmann algebras).

Let XX be a simply connected topological space with Sullivan model

(1)CE(𝔩X)=(Sym (V *),d X) CE( \mathfrak{l} X ) \;=\; \big( Sym^\bullet\big(V^\ast\big), d_X \big)

for V *V^\ast the graded vector space of generators, which is the \mathbb{Q}-linear dual graded vector space of the graded \mathbb{Z}-module (=graded abelian group) of homotopy groups of XX:

V *Hom Ab(π (X),). V^\ast \;\coloneqq\; Hom_{Ab}\big( \pi_\bullet(X), \mathbb{Q} \big) \,.

Declare the wedge product pairing to be given by

(2)V *V * Φ Hom Ab(π (X)π (X),) (α,β) (vw(1) n αn βα(v)β(w)+β(v)α(w)) \array{ V^\ast \wedge V^\ast &\overset{\Phi}{\longrightarrow}& Hom_{Ab} \big( \pi_\bullet(X) \wedge \pi_\bullet(X) , \mathbb{Q} \big) \\ (\alpha, \beta) &\mapsto& \Big( v \wedge w \;\mapsto\; (-1)^{ n_\alpha \cdot n_\beta } \alpha(v)\cdot \beta(w) + \beta(v)\cdot \alpha(w) \Big) }

where α\alpha, β\beta are assumed to be of homogeneous degree n α,n βn_\alpha, n_\beta \in \mathbb{N}, respectively.

(Notice that the usual normalization factor of 1/21/2 is not included on the right. This normalization follows Andrews-Arkowitz 78, above Thm. 6.1.)

Finally, write

(3)[] 2:Sym (V *)V *V * [-]_2 \;\colon\; Sym^\bullet\big(V^\ast\big) \longrightarrow V^\ast \wedge V^\ast

for the linear projection on quadratic polynomials in the graded symmetric algebra.

Statement

Proposition

(co-binary Sullivan differential is Whitehead product)

Let XX be a simply connected topological space of rational finite type, so that it has a Sullivan model with Sullivan differential d Xd_X (1).

Then the co-binary component (3) of the Sullivan differential equals the \mathbb{Q}-linear dual map of the Whitehead product [,] X[-,-]_X on the homotopy groups of XX:

[d Xα] 2=[,] X *. [d_X \alpha]_2 \;=\; [-,-]_X^\ast \,.

More explicitly, the following diagram commutes:

V * [] 2d X V *V * = Φ Hom Ab(π (X),) Hom Ab([,] X,) Hom Ab(π (X)π (X),), \array{ V^\ast &\overset{ [-]_2\circ d_X }{\longrightarrow}& V^\ast \wedge V^\ast \\ \big\downarrow^{ \mathrlap{=} } && \big\downarrow^{ \mathrlap{\Phi} } \\ Hom_{Ab} \big( \pi_\bullet(X), \mathbb{Q} \big) & \underset{ Hom_{Ab}\big( [-,-]_X , \; \mathbb{Q} \big) }{ \longrightarrow } & Hom_{Ab} \big( \pi_\bullet(X) \wedge \pi_\bullet(X), \; \mathbb{Q} \big) } \,,

where the wedge product on the right is normalized as in (2).

(Andrews-Arkowitz 78, Thm. 6.1, see also Félix-Halperin-Thomas 00, Prop. 13.16)


Examples

Hopf fibrations

For X=S 2X = S^2 the 2-sphere, consider the following two elements of its homotopy groups (of spheres, as it were):

  1. id S 2π 2(S 2)id_{S^2} \in \pi_2\big( S^2 \big) (represented by the identity function S 2S 2S^2 \to S^2)

  2. h π 3(S 3)h_{\mathbb{C}} \in \pi_3\big( S^3 \big) (represented by the complex Hopf fibration)

Then the Whitehead product satisfies

(4)[id S 2,id S 2]=2h . \big[ id_{S^2}, \; id_{S^2} \big] \;=\; 2 \cdot h_{\mathbb{C}} \,.

(by this Example).

Now let

vol S 2,vol S 3CE(𝔩S 2) vol_{S^2},\; vol_{S^3} \;\in\; CE\big( \mathfrak{l}S^2 \big)

be the two generators of the Sullivan model of the 2-sphere, normalized such that they correspond to the volume forms of the 2-sphere and (after pullback along the complex Hopf fibration h h_{\mathbb{C}}) of the 3-sphere, respectively.

This means that the Sullivan differential is

(5)d S 2vol S 3=cvol S 2vol S 2 d_{S^2} vol_{S^3} \;=\; c \cdot vol_{S^2} \wedge vol_{S^2}

for some rational number cc \in \mathbb{Q}.

Notice that with the normalization in (2) we have

Φ(vol S 2,vol S 2)(id S 2id S 2) =(1) 22vol S 2(id S 2)vol S 2(id S 2)+vol S 2(id S 2)vol S 2(id S 2) =2 \begin{aligned} \Phi(vol_{S^2}, vol_{S^2})\big( id_{S^2} \wedge id_{S^2} \big) & = (-1)^{2 \cdot 2} vol_{S^2}\big( id_{S^2}\big) \cdot vol_{S^2}\big( id_{S^2}\big) + vol_{S^2}\big( id_{S^2}\big) \cdot vol_{S^2}\big( id_{S^2}\big) \\ & = 2 \end{aligned}

Therefore Prop. gives

{vol S 3} [] 2d S 2 c(vol S 2vol S 2) Φ {h } [,] X * {id S 2id S 22} \array{ \big\{ vol_{S^3} \big\} &\overset{[-]_2\circ d_{S^2}}{\longrightarrow}& c' \cdot ( vol_{S^2} \otimes vol_{S^2} ) \\ \big\downarrow && \big\downarrow^{\mathrlap{\Phi}} \\ \big\{ h_{\mathbb{H}} \big\} &\overset{ [-,-]_X^\ast }{\longrightarrow}& \big\{ id_{S^2} \wedge id_{S^2} \mapsto 2 \big\} }

where in the bottom row we used the Whitehead product (4).

Hence c=1c = 1:

d S 2vol 3=vol S 2vol S 2. d_{S^2} vol_3 \;=\; - vol_{S^2} \wedge vol_{S^2} \,.

See also Félix-Halperin-Thomas 00, Example 1 on p. 178.

References

For further discussion see at Whitehead productReferences in RHT.

Under the general relation between the Sullivan model and the original Quillen model of rational homotopy theory, the statement comes from

  • Daniel Quillen, section I.5 of Rational Homotopy Theory, Annals of Mathematics Second Series, Vol. 90, No. 2 (Sep., 1969), pp. 205-295 (jstor:1970725)

It is made fully explicit in

where the result is attributed to

(which however just touches on it in passing)

and in

  • Francisco Belchí, Urtzi Buijs, José M. Moreno-Fernández, Aniceto Murillo, Prop. 3.1 of: Higher order Whitehead products and L L_\infty structures on the homology of a DGL, Linear Algebra and its Applications, Volume 520 (2017), pages 16-31 (arXiv:1604.01478, doi:10.1016/j.laa.2017.01.008)

Textbook accounts:

  • Yves Félix, Steve Halperin, J.C. Thomas, Prop. 13.16 in Rational Homotopy Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 205, Springer-Verlag, 2000.

Last revised on May 12, 2026 at 11:55:11. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.