higher geometry / derived geometry
geometric little (∞,1)-toposes
geometric big (∞,1)-toposes
function algebras on ∞-stacks?
derived smooth geometry
∞-Lie theory (higher geometry)
An orbifold is much like a smooth manifold but possibly with singularities of the form of fixed points of group-actions.
Where a smooth manifold is a space locally modeled on Cartesian spaces/Euclidean spaces $\mathbb{R}^n$, an orbifold is, more generally, a space that is locally modeled on smooth action groupoids (homotopy quotients) $\mathbb{R}^n\sslash G$ of a finite group $G$ acting on a Cartesian space.
graphics grabbed from Hyde-Ramsden-Robins 14
This turns out to be broadly captured(Moerdijk-Pronk 97, Moerdijk 02) by saying that an orbifold is a proper étale Lie groupoid. (Morita equivalent Lie groupoids correspond to the same orbifolds.)
The word orbifold was invented in (Thurston 1992), while the original name was $V$-manifold (Satake), and was taken in a more restrictive sense, assuming that the actions of finite groups on the charts are always effective. Nowadays we call such orbifolds effective and those which are global quotients by a finite group global quotient orbifolds.
There is also a notion of finite stabilizers in algebraic geometry. A singular variety is called an (algebraic) orbifold if it has only so-called orbifold singularities.
An orbifold is a stack presented by an orbifold groupoid.
One can consider a bicategory of proper étale Lie groupoids and the orbifolds will be the objects of certain bicategorical localization of this bicategory (a result of Moerdijk-Pronk 97).
Equivalently, every orbifold is globally a quotient of a smooth manifold by an action of finite-dimensional Lie group with finite stabilizers in each point. (eg (Adem-Leida-Ruan 2007), Corollary 1.24)
In (ALR 07, theorem 1.23) is asserted that every effective orbifold $X$ (paracompact, Hausdorff) is isomorphic to a global quotient orbifold, specifically to a global quotient of $O(n)$ (where $n$ is the dimension of $X$) acting on the frame bundle of $X$ (which is a manifold).
It has been noticed that the topological invariants of the underlying topological space of an orbifold as a topological space with an orbifold structure are not appropriate, but have to be corrected leading to orbifold Euler characteristics, orbifold cohomology etc. One of the constructions which is useful in this respect is the inertia orbifold (the inertia stack of the original orbifold) which gives rise to “twisted sectors” in Hilbert space of a quantum field theory on the orbifold, and also to twisted sectors in the appropriate cohomology spaces. A further generalization gives multitwisted sectors.
Some basic building blocks of orbifolds:
The quotient of a ball by a discrete subgroup of the special orthogonal group of rotations. Is an orbifold, and orbifolds may be obtained by cutting out balls from ordinary smooth manifolds and gluing in these orbifold quotients.
The moduli stack of elliptic curves over the complex numbers is an orbifold, being the homotopy quotient of the upper half plane by the special linear group acting by Möbius transformations.
For $\mathcal{G}$ any orbifold, then the mapping space $\mathcal{G}^{\Pi(S^1)} = \mathcal{G}^{B\mathbb{Z}}$ is again an orbifold, called the inertia orbifold.
lens spaces?
Orbifolds are in differential geometry what Deligne-Mumford stacks are in algebraic geometry. See also at geometric invariant theory and GIT-stable point.
If the finiteness condition is dropped one also speaks of orbispaces and generally of stacks.
Orbifolds may be regarded as a kind of stratified spaces.
See also
Orbifolds in string theory:
The concept originates in
I. Satake, On a generalisation of the notion of manifold, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 42 (1956), 359–363.
I. Satake, The Gauss–Bonnet theorem for $V$-manifolds, J. Math. Soc. Japan 9 (1957), 464–492.
William Thurston, Three-dimensional geometry and topology, preliminary draft, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, (1992)
which in completed and revised form is available as his book: The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds; in particular the orbifold discussion is in chapter 13.
Survey of basic orbifold theory:
Daryl Cooper, Craig Hodgson, Steve Kerckhoff, Three-dimensional Orbifolds and Cone-Manifolds, MSJ Memoirs Volume 5, 2000 (pdf, euclid:1389985812)
Adam Kaye, Two-Dimensional Orbifolds, 2007 (pdf)
Michael Davis, Lectures on orbifolds and reflection groups, 2008 (pdf)
Joan Porti, An introduction to orbifolds, 2009 (pdf)
Christian Lange, Orbifolds from a metric viewpoint (arXiv:1801.03472)
Renato G. Bettiol, Andrzej Derdzinski, Paolo Piccione, Teichmüller theory and collapse of flat manifolds, Annali di Matematica (2018) 197: 1247 (arXiv:1705.08431, doi:10.1007/s10231-017-0723-7)
S. T. Hyde, S. J. Ramsden and V. Robins, Unification and classification of two-dimensional crystalline patterns using orbifolds, Acta Cryst. (2014). A70, 319-337 (doi:10.1107/S205327331400549X)
Discussion of orbifold as Lie groupoids/differentiable stacks is in
Ieke Moerdijk, Dorette Pronk, Orbifolds, sheaves and groupoids, K-theory 12 3-21 (1997) (pdf)
Ieke Moerdijk, Orbifolds as Groupoids: an Introduction, Alejandro Adem, Jack Morava, Yongbin Ruan (eds.) Orbifolds in Mathematics and Physics, Contemporary Math 310 , AMS (2002), 205–222 (arXiv:math.DG/0203100)
Eugene Lerman, Orbifolds as stacks? (arXiv:0806.4160)
The mapping stacks of orbifolds are discussed in
Orbifolds often appear as moduli spaces in differential geometric setting:
The generalization of orbifolds to weighted branched manifolds is discussed in
A reference dealing with the string topology of orbifolds is
The relation of orbifolds to global equivariant homotopy theory is discussed in
See also
(which is mainly tailored toward Thurston’s approach).
Orbifold cobordisms are discussed in
K. S. Druschel, Oriented Orbifold Cobordism, Pacific J. Math., 164(2) (1994), 299-319.
K. S. Druschel, The Cobordism of Oriented Three Dimensional Orbifolds, Pacific J. Math., bf 193(1) (2000), 45-55.
Andres Angel, Orbifold cobordism (pdf)
See also at orbifold cobordism.
In perturbative string theory, orbifolds as target spaces for a string sigma-model were first considered in
Lance Dixon, Jeff Harvey, Cumrun Vafa, Edward Witten, Strings on orbifolds, Nuclear Physics B Volume 261, 1985, Pages 678-686 (doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90593-0)
Lance Dixon, Jeff Harvey, Cumrun Vafa, Edward Witten, Strings on orbifolds (II), Nuclear Physics B Volume 274, Issue 2, 15 September 1986, Pages 285-314 (doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90287-7)
and then further developed notably in
Robbert Dijkgraaf, Cumrun Vafa, Erik Verlinde, Herman Verlinde, The operator algebra of orbifold models, Comm. Math. Phys. Volume 123, Number 3 (1989), 485-526.
Eric Zaslow, Topological orbifold models and quantum cohomology rings, Comm. Math. Phys. 156 (1993), no. 2, 301–331.
See also the references at fractional D-brane.
Review of orbifolds in the context of string compactifications includes
and for orbifolds of G2-manifolds for M-theory on G2-manifolds
Frank Reidegeld, $G_2$-orbifolds from K3 surfaces with ADE-singularities (arXiv:1512.05114)
Frank Reidegeld, $G_2$-orbifolds with ADE-singularities (pdf)
For topological strings the path integral as a pull-push transform for target orbifolds – in analogy to what Gromov-Witten theory is for Deligne-Mumford stacks – has first been considered in
A review with further pointers is in
Last revised on December 12, 2018 at 11:50:58. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.