transfinite arithmetic, cardinal arithmetic, ordinal arithmetic
prime field, p-adic integer, p-adic rational number, p-adic complex number
arithmetic geometry, function field analogy
physics, mathematical physics, philosophy of physics
theory (physics), model (physics)
experiment, measurement, computable physics
Axiomatizations
Tools
Structural phenomena
Types of quantum field thories
For a suitable linear operator $H$ (say on section of a line bundle over a Riemann surface), its zeta function is the analytic continuation of the trace
of the $-s$ power of $H$, which, if $H$ is suitably self-adjoint, is the sum of the $-s$-powers of all its eigenvalues, as a function of $s$. This is analogous to the Riemann zeta function and the Dedekind zeta function (or would be if there were something like a Laplace operator on Spec(Z) or more generally on an arithmetic curve, see at function field analogy).
The exponential of the derivative of the zeta function at $n = 0$ also encodes the functional determinant of $H$, a regularized version (“zeta function regularization”) of the naive and generally ill-defined product of all eigenvalues. As such, zeta functions play a central role in quantum field theory.
Generally, the values of $\zeta_H(s)$ of interest in physics (when regarding $H$ as a Hamilton operator) are those for (low) integral $s$. These are just the special values of L-functions.
Given an elliptic differential operator with positive lower bound $c$, write $H$ for its self-adjoint extension and write
for its eigenvalues.
The zeta function of $H$ is the holomorphic function defined by the series
where this converges and then extended by analytic continuation.
(e.g. (Duistermaat-Guillemin 75 (2.13), Berline-Getzler-Vergne 04, section 9.6 ) ).
Notice that the first derivative $\zeta^\prime_H$ of this zeta function is, where the original series converges, given by
Therefore one says (Ray-Singer 71) that the functional determinant of $H$ is the exponential of the derivative of zeta function of $H$ at 0:
Via the analytic continuation involved in defining $\zeta_H(0)$ in the first place, this may be thought of as a regularization of the ill-defined naive definition “$\prod_n \lambda_n$” of the determinant of $H$. As such functional determinants often appear in quantum field theory as what is called zeta function regularization.
Conversely, the logarithm
is what is called the vacuum energy in quantum field theory (for $H^{-1}$ the Feynman propagator).
If $H = D^2$ has a square root $D$ (a Dirac operator-type square root as in supersymmetric quantum mechanics) then under some conditions on the growth of the eigenvalues, then the functional determinant may also be expressed in terms of the eta function of $D$ as
See at eta invariant – Relation to zeta function for more on this.
By basic integration identities we have that
The series expression in def. is equal to the Mellin transform of the partition function
(see e.g. Quine-Heydari-Song 93 (8), Richardson, pages 8-9, BCEMZ 03, section A.2, Connes-Marcolli 06, theorem 13.11).
If one thinks of the operation $H$ as a Hamiltonian of a quantum mechanical system, then the term
is the partition function of this system. Accordingly, prop. says that the zeta function of $H$ is obtained from its partition function by
Further, by a change of integration variable $t\coloneqq x^2$ in the expression in prop. one obtains
The series expression in def. is equal to
In particular if $H = D^2$ is the square of a Dirac operator/supersymmetric quantum mechanics-type square root operator $D$ with eigenvalues $\pm \alpha_k$,then $\lambda_k = \alpha_k^2$ and hence in this case the series is
By comparison one observes:
The integral expression in prop. is analogous to the expression of zeta functions in number theory/arithmetic geometry as integrals of a theta function (for instance discussed here for the Riemann zeta function)
Under this analogy the theta function in the case of the differential operator $H$ is
This is formally the same definition as that of adelic theta functions (e.g.Garrett 11, section 1.8)
The determinant line bundle of the functional determinant of the Dirac operator on a complex torus is a complex-analytic theta function as above, quotiented by the Dedekind eta function.
Early references explaining this include Alvarez-Gaumé & Moore & Vafa 86, Alvarez-Gaumé & Bost & Moore & Nelson & Vafa 87. In a bigger perspective, this relation plays a central role in the general discussion of self-dual higher gauge theory (Witten 96).
For $\mathbb{C}/(\mathbb{Z}\oplus \tau \mathbb{Z})$ a complex torus (complex elliptic curve) equipped with its standard flat Riemannian metric, then the zeta function of the corresponding Laplace operator $\Delta$ is
The corresponding functional determinant is
where $\eta$ is the Dedekind eta function.
(recalled e.g. in Todorov 03, page 3)
For more see also at zeta function of a Riemann surface.
The functional determinant of a Laplace operator of a Riemannian manifold acting on differential n-forms is up to a sign in the exponent a factor in what is called the analytic torsion of the manifold.
context/function field analogy | theta function $\theta$ | zeta function $\zeta$ (= Mellin transform of $\theta(0,-)$) | L-function $L_{\mathbf{z}}$ (= Mellin transform of $\theta(\mathbf{z},-)$) | eta function $\eta$ | special values of L-functions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
physics/2d CFT | partition function $\theta(\mathbf{z},\mathbf{\tau}) = Tr(\exp(-\mathbf{\tau} \cdot (D_\mathbf{z})^2))$ as function of complex structure $\mathbf{\tau}$ of worldsheet $\Sigma$ (hence polarization of phase space) and background gauge field/source $\mathbf{z}$ | analytically continued trace of Feynman propagator $\zeta(s) = Tr_{reg}\left(\frac{1}{(D_{0})^2}\right)^s = \int_{0}^\infty \tau^{s-1} \,\theta(0,\tau)\, d\tau$ | analytically continued trace of Feynman propagator in background gauge field $\mathbf{z}$: $L_{\mathbf{z}}(s) \coloneqq Tr_{reg}\left(\frac{1}{(D_{\mathbf{z}})^2}\right)^s = \int_{0}^\infty \tau^{s-1} \,\theta(\mathbf{z},\tau)\, d\tau$ | analytically continued trace of Dirac propagator in background gauge field $\mathbf{z}$ $\eta_{\mathbf{z}}(s) = Tr_{reg} \left(\frac{sgn(D_{\mathbf{z}})}{ { \vert D_{\mathbf{z}} } \vert }\right)^s$ | regularized 1-loop vacuum amplitude $pv\, L_{\mathbf{z}}(1) = Tr_{reg}\left(\frac{1}{(D_{\mathbf{z}})^2}\right)$ / regularized fermionic 1-loop vacuum amplitude $pv\, \eta_{\mathbf{z}}(1)= Tr_{reg} \left( \frac{D_{\mathbf{z}}}{(D_{\mathbf{z}})^2} \right)$ / vacuum energy $-\frac{1}{2}L_{\mathbf{z}}^\prime(0) = Z_H = \frac{1}{2}\ln\;det_{reg}(D_{\mathbf{z}}^2)$ |
Riemannian geometry (analysis) | zeta function of an elliptic differential operator | zeta function of an elliptic differential operator | eta function of a self-adjoint operator | functional determinant, analytic torsion | |
complex analytic geometry | section $\theta(\mathbf{z},\mathbf{\tau})$ of line bundle over Jacobian variety $J(\Sigma_{\mathbf{\tau}})$ in terms of covering coordinates $\mathbf{z}$ on $\mathbb{C}^g \to J(\Sigma_{\mathbf{\tau}})$ | zeta function of a Riemann surface | Selberg zeta function | Dedekind eta function | |
arithmetic geometry for a function field | Goss zeta function (for arithmetic curves) and Weil zeta function (in higher dimensional arithmetic geometry) | ||||
arithmetic geometry for a number field | Hecke theta function, automorphic form | Dedekind zeta function (being the Artin L-function $L_{\mathbf{z}}$ for $\mathbf{z} = 0$ the trivial Galois representation) | Artin L-function $L_{\mathbf{z}}$ of a Galois representation $\mathbf{z}$, expressible “in coordinates” (by Artin reciprocity) as a finite-order Hecke L-function (for 1-dimensional representations) and generally (via Langlands correspondence) by an automorphic L-function (for higher dimensional reps) | class number $\cdot$ regulator | |
arithmetic geometry for $\mathbb{Q}$ | Jacobi theta function ($\mathbf{z} = 0$)/ Dirichlet theta function ($\mathbf{z} = \chi$ a Dirichlet character) | Riemann zeta function (being the Dirichlet L-function $L_{\mathbf{z}}$ for Dirichlet character $\mathbf{z} = 0$) | Artin L-function of a Galois representation $\mathbf{z}$ , expressible “in coordinates” (via Artin reciprocity) as a Dirichlet L-function (for 1-dimensional Galois representations) and generally (via Langlands correspondence) as an automorphic L-function |
An early reference is
(see also at Duistermaat-Guillemin trace formula)
Textbook accounts include
Review includes
Ken Richardson, section 3 of Introduction to the Eta invariant (pdf)
J. R. Quine, S. H. Heydari, R. Y. Song, Zeta regularized products, Transactions of the AMS volume 338, number 1, 1993 (pdf)
Wikipedia, Zeta function regularization
Alain Connes, Matilde Marcolli, A walk in the noncommutative garden (arXiv:0601054)
Eugene Speer, On the structure of Analytic Renormalization, Comm. math. Phys. 23, 23-36 (1971) (Euclid)
A. Bytsenko, G. Cognola, Emilio Elizalde, Valter Moretti, S. Zerbini, section 2 of Analytic Aspects of Quantum Fields, World Scientific Publishing, 2003, ISBN 981-238-364-6
The definition of a functional determinant via the exponential of the derivative of the zeta function at 0 originates in
Discussion in the special case of 2d CFT (worldsheet string theory) is in
Luis Alvarez-Gaumé, Gregory Moore, Cumrun Vafa, Theta functions, modular invariance, and strings, Communications in Mathematical Physics Volume 106, Number 1 (1986), 1-4 (Euclid)
Luis Alvarez-Gaumé, Jean-Benoit Bost, Gregory Moore, Philip Nelson, Cumrun Vafa, Bosonization on higher genus Riemann surfaces, Communications in Mathematical Physics, Volume 112, Number 3 (1987), 503-552 (Euclid)
Andrey Todorov, The analogue of the Dedekind eta function for CY threefolds, 2003 pdf
Last revised on July 20, 2015 at 09:14:00. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.