physics, mathematical physics, philosophy of physics
theory (physics), model (physics)
experiment, measurement, computable physics
Axiomatizations
Tools
Structural phenomena
Types of quantum field thories
The spinning relativistic particle is a variant of the plain relativistic particle which has an “internal degree of freedom” called spin: it is a spinor , a fermion. Examples that appear in the standard model of particle physics are electrons, and quarks.
As a 1-dimensional sigma-model, the spinning relativistic particle is like the relativistic particle but with fermion fields on the worldline. This worldline action always happens to have worldline supersymmetry, entirely independent of whether there is any supersymmetry on target spacetime.
We discuss how spinning particles automatically have supersymmetry in their worldline formalism. For more see the references below for more and see also at string theory FAQ – Does string theory predict supersymmetry?.
In the Polyakov action-formulation the action functional of the relativistic particle sigma model on the 1-dimensional worldline is actually 1-dimensional gravity coupled to “worldline matter fields”, where the latter are the embedding fields $\phi : \mathbb{R} \to X$ into the target space.
It turns out that the generalization of this 1-dimensional gravity action to supergravity yields the action functional that describes ordinary Dirac spinors – spinning particles like electrons – propagating on target space $X$. See the references on worldline supersymmetry below.
The worldline supersymmetry of fermions comes down to the fact that their Hamiltonian(-constraint) operator $H$ has a square root: the Dirac operator $D$. Its defining equations
characterize the $d = 1$ translation super-Lie algebra.
For appreciating this fact it is important to keep the ingredients of sigma-model theory sorted out correctly: a supersymmetric theory on the worldline describes a spinning particle on some spacetime coupled to some background gauge fields. That background geometry need not have a “global supersymmetry” (a covariant constant spinor), hence under second quantization the perturbation theory on target space induced by the worldline theory need not have any global supersymmetries (in particular no superpartners to the effective particle excitations). What will happen, though, is that the full target space theory induced under second quantization will be a supergravity theory on target space. Some of its solutions may have covariantly constant spinors (and hence global supersymmetry), but generically they will not, just like the generic solution to ordinary Einstein equations does not have a Killing vector.
partition functions in quantum field theory as indices/genera/orientations in generalized cohomology theory:
That some particles have a property called spin was found in 1922 in the Stern-Gerlach experiment.
Lecture notes in view of application to perturbative quantum field theory via worldline formalism:
Discussion that cancellation of the quantum anomaly of the spinning particle precisely requires Spin-structure on its target spacetime:
Discussion of worldline dynamics of spinning particles in background fields:
Jan-Willem van Holten, Relativistic Dynamics of Spin in Strong External Fields [arXiv:hep-th/9303124]
A. Pomeranskii, R A Sen’kov, I.B. Khriplovich, Spinning relativistic particles in external fields Acta Physica Polonica B Proceedings Supplement Vol. 1 (2008) (pdf)
Krzysztof Andrzejewski, Cezary Gonera, Joanna Goner, Piotr Kosinski, Pawel Maslanka, Spinning particles, coadjoint orbits and Hamiltonian formalism (arXiv:2008.09478)
Discussion via coadjoint orbits:
Among the early references that describe the observation that the supersymmetric extension of the worldline theory of the relativistic particle describes ordinary Dirac fermions are
F.A. Berezin and M.S. Marinov, Ann. Phys. (NY) 104 (1977) 336
Lars Brink, Paolo Di Vecchia, Paul Howe, A Lagrangian formulation of the classical and quantum dynamics of spinning particles, Nucl. Phys. B 118 (1977) 76 [doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90364-9]
R. Casalbuoni, Phys. Lett. B62 (1976), 49
A. Barducci, R. Casalbuoni and L. Lusanna, Nuov. Cim. 35A (1976), 377 Nucl. Phys. B124 (1977), 93; id. 521
A survey of constructions of worldline supersymmetric action functional for spinning particles in various background fields is given in
An argument that for arbitrary backgrounds the spinning particle’s worldline action is supersymmetric is given in
Textbook surveys of worline supersymmetry include
the beginning of section 14.1.1 in
Derivation of the supersymmetric worldline action of the spinning particle in the worldline formalism of QFT scattering amplitudes is around (3.6) of
See also:
Dmitri P. Sorokin, Vladimir I. Tkach, Dmitrij V. Volkov, Aleksandr A. Zheltukhin, From the Superparticle Siegel Symmetry to the Spinning Particle Proper Time Supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 216 (1989) 302-306 [doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)91119-2]
Rachel H. Rietdijk, Spinning particles in general relativity Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, Vol. 98, No. 3 (1994)
Warren Siegel, p. 194 of: Fields (arXiv:hep-th/9912205)
There, first exercise IIIB1.3 gives the action expanded out in all components, and then the following exercise IIIB1.4 gives the reformulation in superfield formalism which makes manifest that the action is invariant under worldline supersymmetry.
Roberto Casalbuoni, Joaquim Gomis, Kiyoshi Kamimura, Giorgio Longhi, Space-time Vector Supersymmetry and Massive Spinning Particle (web)
E. Boffo, Particles in the superworldline and BRST [arXiv:2207.02041]
Last revised on May 17, 2024 at 13:12:19. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.