topology (point-set topology, point-free topology)
see also differential topology, algebraic topology, functional analysis and topological homotopy theory
Basic concepts
fiber space, space attachment
Extra stuff, structure, properties
Kolmogorov space, Hausdorff space, regular space, normal space
sequentially compact, countably compact, locally compact, sigma-compact, paracompact, countably paracompact, strongly compact
Examples
Basic statements
closed subspaces of compact Hausdorff spaces are equivalently compact subspaces
open subspaces of compact Hausdorff spaces are locally compact
compact spaces equivalently have converging subnet of every net
continuous metric space valued function on compact metric space is uniformly continuous
paracompact Hausdorff spaces equivalently admit subordinate partitions of unity
injective proper maps to locally compact spaces are equivalently the closed embeddings
locally compact and second-countable spaces are sigma-compact
Theorems
Analysis Theorems
homotopy theory, (∞,1)-category theory, homotopy type theory
flavors: stable, equivariant, rational, p-adic, proper, geometric, cohesive, directed…
models: topological, simplicial, localic, …
see also algebraic topology
Introductions
Definitions
Paths and cylinders
Homotopy groups
Basic facts
Theorems
The recognition principle for finite relative loop spaces states that, for , a pair of pointed topological spaces is of the homotopy type of a relative -loop space pair of some -connected inclusion map if and only if it is a grouplike algebra over the Swiss cheese operad , in the sense of an algebra over an operad.
The recognition principle for infinite relative loop spaces states that a pair of pointed topological spaces is of the homotopy type of a relative -loop space pair of some 1-shifted morphism of connective spectra if and only if it is a grouplike algebra over .
These are relative versions of May recognition theorem (May 72, May 74) of loop spaces.
The recognition principle for relative -loop spaces was proved in (Vieira 2020) for . The proof there works in the cases if we assume the spaces connected. The general case for was proved in (Hoefel, Livernet, Stasheff 2016). The unconnected case for remains open.
Notoriously the loop space functors that appear in these recognition theorems are not right adjoint, thus they cannot be proved as an equivalence of homotopy categories induced by a Quillen equivalence. May’s original strategy is to define what essentially constitutes adjunction units up to resolutions induced by the two-sided bar construction. The strategy of (Vieira 2020) is to define a generalization of Quillen adjunction that allow for the units and counits to exist only up to functorially determined resolutions, providing a natural model theoretical axiomatization of the essential elements of May’s original proof. For the full proof, homotopical versions of the concepts of idempotent monad and idempotent adjunction require similar generalizations. This is because we are interested in the homotopy subcategories of grouplike algebras and -connected spaces/connective spectra.
Bellow the proof of the relative recognition of -loop spaces for using the machinery of idempotent quasiadjunctions in (Vieira 2020) is sketched.
In (Vieira 2023) idempotent quasiadjunctions were used to prove a recognition theorem of -loop pairs of commutative algebra spectra over commutative ring spectra. There it is shown that the multiplicative structure induced by the linear isometries operad is compatible with the model theoretical machinery presented here.
To construct the unit and counit natural transformations of an adjuction between homotopy categories of model categories it suffices to construct a unit natural span and counit natural cospan at the model categories level, plus some additional compatibility conditions.
(Vieira 2020, Definition 2.1.1) Let and be model categories. A weak Quillen quasiadjunction, or just quasiadjunction, between and , denoted by
is a quadruple of functors
with the left quasiadjoint and the right quasiadjoint, equipped with a natural span in and a natural cospan in
such that
(i) is left derivable;
(ii) is right derivable;
(iii) and preserve cofibrant and fibrant objects;
(iv) and are natural weak equivalences;
(v) If is cofibrant then ;
(vi) If is fibrant then .
If , , and are all identities and the homotopy equivalences in (v) and (vi) are equalities we recover the notion of a weak Quillen adjunction. If we further require to preserve cofibrations and to preserve fibrations we get a Quillen adjunction. Though the above information is weaker than that of a Quillen adjunction it suffices to construct an adjunction at the homotopy categories level.
(Vieira 2020, Theorem 2.1.2) A quasiadjunction induces an adjunction
between the homotopy categories.
The following generalization of Quillen idempotent monads (see Bousfield-Friedlander theorem) was also introduced following the same principle of only requiring the existence of a unit natural span, and they also induce Bousfield localizations.
(Vieira 2020, Definition 2.3.1) Let be a right proper model category. A Quillen idempotent quasimonad on , or simply an idempotent quasimonad, is a pair of endofunctors equipped with a natural span
such that:
(i) is a natural weak equivalence;
(ii) preserves weak equivalences;
(iii) and are natural weak equivalences;
(iv) If , and then ;
(v) If then .
(Vieira 2020, Theorem 2.3.5 / Proposition 2.3.6) An idempotent quasimonad induces a left Bousfield localization with , and the subset composed of the fibrations such that
is a homotopy pullback.
The resulting homotopy category is the reflective subcategory
of -fibrant objects.
The above definition can be dualized. The resulting idempotent quasicomonads induce right Bousfield localizations and associated coreflective homotopy subcategories.
A quasiadjunction induces the following natural span on and natural cospan on
where and are the functorial (co)fibrant resolutions of the model structures.
(Vieira 2020, Definition 2.3.7) An idempotent quasiadjunction is a quasiadjunction such that the induced span and cospan are respectively an idempotent quasimonad and an idempotent quasicomonad.
(Vieira 2020, Theorem 2.3.8) An idempotent quasiadjunction induces an equivalence between the associated (co)reflective homotopy subcategories.
In this section fix some . Let be the cubical Swiss cheese relative operad, a colored operad over the colors , respectively referred to as the closed and open colors. It induces a monad on the category of pairs of pointed topological spaces (see algebra over an operad). We denote pairs of pointed spaces as . Denote by the category of algebras over , which we equip with the mixed model structure transferred from the one on .
Denote by the category of pointed maps, equipped with the mixed projective model structure. We denote maps as .
The relative -loop pair functor is
The relative -suspension functor is
See relative loop space for details on why we use this definition for relative loop spaces. Note that the above functor outputs both a relative loop space and a loop space of the total space, since the structure of interest here includes the action of on .
(Vieira 2020, Proposition 2.2.3) We have a weak Quillen adjunction
This adjunction transfers a new model structure on , with weak equivalences the commutative squares such that are isomorphisms for all and are isomorphisms for all . All objects of are fibrant in this model structure. We will say a pointed map is -connected if is -connected and is -connected. The cofibrant objects are the that are homotopy equivalent to -connected inclusions of relative CW-pairs. We denote the category of pointed maps equipped with this model structure as .
The images of are naturally algebras over , so we have an induced functor . This functor is not a right adjoint, but it does have a left weak Quillen quasiadjoint induced by the two-sided bar construction.
The relative -delooping functor is
The resolution of -spaces functor is
(Vieira 2020, Theorem 4.3.5, Theorem 4.3.8) We have an idempotent weak Quillen quasiadjunction
If then this quasiadjunction induces an equivalence
between the homotopy subcategory of grouplike Swiss cheese algebras and the homotopy category of -connected pointed maps.
In the reference Vieira 2020 a cofibrant resolution of is used. The fact that is a -cofibrant operad (see model structure on operads) when we consider the mixed model structure of collections means this assumption is not necessary.
The reason the proof of the above theorem doesn’t extend to the cases is due to the fact that the constructed unit of the quasiadjunction is induced by a natural map which is a natural pair of group completions if and only if .
Let be the category of sequential spectra, and the category composed of pairs of spectra equipped with a 1-shifted spectra map . Morphisms are pairs of spectra maps that commute with the shifted spectra maps in the appropriate sense. It admits a strict mixed model structure with weak equivalences the level-wise weak homotopy equivalences and with fibrations the level-wise Hurewicz fibrations.
The spectrification functor is
where is a certain inclusion prespectrum constructed from , equipped with a quotient map (LMS 86, Appendix 1). If is already an inclusion spectrum then .
This functor induces a spectrification functor
We have a natural stable weak homotopy equivalence which gives a Quillen idempotent monad structure on . The stable mixed model structure on is the one induced by this idempotent monad, which is the left Bousfield localization of the strict mixed model structure on the pairs of stable weak homotopy equivalences. The fibrant objects in this model structure are the Omega-spectra.
The relative base pair of spaces functor is
The relative -loop pair of spaces functor is
The images of are naturally algebras over , so we have an induced functor .
The relative -delooping functor is
The resolution of -spaces functor is
(Vieira 2020, Theorem 4.3.5, Theorem 4.3.8) We have an idempotent weak Quillen quasiadjunction
which induces an equivalence
between the homotopy category of grouplike Swiss cheese algebras and the homotopy category of shifted spectra maps between connective spectra.
Eduardo Hoefel, Muriel Livernet, Jim Stasheff, -actions and recognition of relative loop spaces, Topology and its Applications 206 (2016) 126-147 [arXiv:1312.7155, doi:10.1016/j.topol.2016.03.023]
L. Gaunce Lewis, Peter May, Mark Steinberger (with contributions by J.E. McClure), Equivariant stable homotopy theory, Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1213 (1986) [pdf, doi:10.1007/BFb0075778]
Peter May, The geometry of iterated loop spaces, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer 1972 (doi:10.1007/BFb0067491, pdf)
Peter May, -Spaces, group completions, and permutative categories, New Developments in Topology, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Series 11 (1974) (pdf)
Renato Vasconcellos Vieira, Relative recognition principle, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 20(3): 1431-1486 (2020) [arXiv:1802.01530, doi:10.2140/agt.2020.20.1431]
Renato Vasconcellos Vieira, Recognition of connective commutative algebra spectra
through an idempotent quasiadjunction_, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 23(1):arXiv:2101.03052, 295-338 (2023) & doi:10.2140/agt.2023.23.295]
Last revised on March 29, 2023 at 16:34:55. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.