physics, mathematical physics, philosophy of physics
theory (physics), model (physics)
experiment, measurement, computable physics
Axiomatizations
Tools
Structural phenomena
Types of quantum field thories
exceptional structures, exceptional isomorphisms
exceptional finite rotation groups:
and Kac-Moody groups:
exceptional Jordan superalgebra, $K_10$
In the philosophy of science and particularly the philosophy of physics, the philosophical sentiment which expresses the following perspective on the description of physics by mathematics might deserve to be called exceptional naturalism or similar:
Since nature (reality) is exceptional in that it has existence, it is plausible that it is the exceptional structures among all mathematical structures — such as the exceptional examples in the classification of simple Lie groups, the exceptional Lie groups — that play a role in the mathematical description of nature, hence in physics and specifically in phenomenology.
In that this perspective provides a priori grounds for the way the universe is, it may be contrasted with empiricism.
Sources where a sentiment of exceptional naturalism has been expressed include the following:
David Olive (in Olive & Landsberg 1989) writes:
The results… add the stunning new question as to why nature has an apparent predilection for exceptional structures such as the E groups.
and:
I sense that the trail of exceptional structures is growing even warmer.
Baez 95, in a context of the role of the monster group in physics, writes:
one may argue that the theory of our universe must be incredibly special, since out of all the theories we can write down, just this one describes the universe that actually exists. All sorts of simpler universes apparently don’t exist. So maybe the theory of the universe needs to use special, “exceptional” mathematics for some reason, even though it’s complicated
Ramond 01 writes, in a context of heterotic string theory and M-theory:
Nature relishes unique mathematical structures.
and:
The Exceptional Algebras are most unique and beautiful among Lie Algebras, and no one should be surprised if Nature uses them.
Witten 02a, in the context of M-theory on G₂-manifolds says, with regard to the exceptional Lie group G₂:
…arise in compactifying from eleven to four dimensions on a compact seven-manifold $X$ of G₂-holonomy. This seems like an interesting starting point for making a model of the real world, which is certainly exceptional
Witten 02b, in the context of grand unified theory and heterotic string theory says:
Describing nature by a group taken from an infinite family does raise an obvious question – why this group and not another? In addition to the three infinite families, there are five exceptional Lie groups, namely G₂, F₄, E₆, E₇, E₈. Since nature is so exceptional, why not describe it using an exceptional Lie group?
Ramond 03 writes in a context of grand unification:
In the Lie garden, one also finds five rare flowers, the exceptional algebras: G₂, F₄, E₆, E₇, E₈, their rank indicated by the subscripts. In view of Nature’s fascination with unique structures, they merit further study.
Boya 03 writes in view of the various occurrences of the octonions in M-theory:
If the current M-theory is a unique theory, one should expect it to make use of singular, non-generic mathematical structures. Now it is known that many of the special objects in mathematics are related to octonions, and therefore it is not surprising that this putative theory-of-everything should display geometric and algebraic structures derived from this unique non-associative division algebra.
Toppan 03 writes:
There is a growing interest in the logical possibility that exceptional mathematical structures (exceptional Lie and superLie algebras, the exceptional Jordan algebra, etc.) could be linked to an ultimate “exceptional” formulation for a Theory Of Everything (TOE). The maximal division algebra of the octonions can be held as the mathematical responsible for the existence of the exceptional structures mentioned above.
Moore 14 writes, in a survey of the state of mathematical physics applied to fundamental high energy physics/particle physics (“Physical Mathematics”):
it must be said that much of Physical Mathematics has a predilection for special, sporadic, and exceptional structures. $[$…$]$ I cannot forecast what stormy weather our field is destined to endure, but I can confidently forecast abundant moonshine in the years ahead. (section 11 “Exceptional structures”)
Vafa 15, slide 11 makes a related comment – in the context of F-theory GUT phenomenology requiring a point with E-type symmetry:
The landscape concept typically goes against things being exceptional. Here we seem to have evidence to the contrary.
Penrose 2015, thinking of twistor space, voices the idea that nature realizes very special mathematical spaces (in the first few minutes of the video recording here).
Harvey & Moore 2020 write:
Physicists who wonder about the ultimate structure of our universe can be divided into two classes. The first class believes that our universe is chosen at random from a huge ensemble of possible universes. The second class believes that our universe and the fundamental laws that govern it are based on some beautiful and exceptional mathematical structure. String theory provides evidence for both points of view… The authors of the present paper are philosophically inclined towards the point of view of the second class of physicists and are thus interested in studying special points in the landscape of string compactifications that involve beautiful and exceptional mathematical structures. Certainly among these special points the ones associated to moonshine are amongst the most beautiful.
David Olive and Peter Landsberg, Introduction to String Theory: Its Structure and its Uses [and Discussion], Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Vol. 329, No. 1605, Physics and Mathematics of Strings (Nov. 17, 1989), pp. 319-328, (JSTOR)
John Baez, This Week’s Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 66), October 10, 1995
Luis Boya, Octonions and M-theory (arXiv:hep-th/0301037).
Pierre Ramond, Algebraic Dreams (arXiv:hep-th/0112261)
Edward Witten, Deconstruction, $G_2$ Holonomy, and Doublet-Triplet Splitting, (arXiv:hep-ph/0201018)
Edward Witten, Quest For Unification, Heinrich Hertz lecture at SUSY 2002 at DESY, Hamburg (arXiv:hep-ph/0207124)
Pierre Ramond, Exceptional Groups and Physics (hep-th/0301050)
Francesco Toppan, Exceptional Structures in Mathematics and Physics and the Role of the Octonions, (arXiv:hep-th/0312023)
Gregory Moore, Physical Mathematics and the Future, talk at Strings 2014
Cumrun Vafa, Reflections on F-theory, 2015 (pdf)
Roger Penrose, Twistor theory, talk at New Spaces for Mathematics and Physics, IHP Paris 2015 (video recording)
Jeffrey A. Harvey, Gregory W. Moore, Moonshine, Superconformal Symmetry, and Quantum Error Correction, J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 146 (2020). (arXiv:2003.13700)
(in relation to the Monster vertex operator algebra and quantum error correction)
Last revised on September 18, 2024 at 04:04:00. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.