There are various hints (originally observed in Witten 95) that all perturbative superstring theories (type II (A and B), type I, heterotic ( and )) have a joint strong coupling non-perturbative limit whose low energy effective field theory description is 11-dimensional supergravity and which reduces to the various string theories by Kaluza-Klein compactification on an orientifold torus bundle, followed by various string dualities. Since the string itself is thought to arise from a membrane/M2-brane in 11-dimensions after double dimensional reduction this hypothetical theory has been called “M-theory” short for “membrane theory”; e.g. in Hořava-Witten 95:
As it has been proposed that the eleven-dimensional theory is a supermembrane theory but there are some reasons to doubt that interpretation, we will non-committally call it the M-theory, leaving to the future the relation of M to membranes.
The “reasons to doubt” that interpretation is that the M2-brane certainly does not support a perturbation theory the way that the superstring does. This is part of the reason why the actual nature of “M-theory” remains mysterious.
Keeping in mind that already string theory itself and in fact already quantum field theory itself have only partially been formulated in a precise way, the conjecture is motivated from the fact that with the available knowledge of these subjects – particularly from duality in string theory – one can see indications that there is a kind of commuting diagram of the form
in some sense (see also e.g. (Obers-Pioline 98, p. 12)). The unknown top left corner here has optimistically been given a name, and that is “M-theory”. But even the rough global structure of the top left corner has remained elusive.
The available evidence that there is something of interest consists of various facets of the bottom left and the top right entry of the above diagram, that seem to have a common origin in the top left corner.
Notably, from the black brane-solution structure in 11-dimensional supergravity and from the brane scan one finds that it contains a 2-brane, called the M2-brane, and to the extent that one has this under control one can show that under “double dimensional reduction” this becomes the string. However, it is clear that this cannot quite give a definition of the top left corner by perturbation theory as the superstring sigma-model does for the bottom left corner. At the bottom of it, this is simply because, by the very nature of the conjecture, the top left corner is supposed to be given by a non-perturbative strong-coupling limit of the bottom left corner. But one may also see that the evident guess for a would-be membrane analog of the string perturbation series fails
Mike Duff, Paul Townsend, and other physicists working on supermembranes had spent a couple of years in the mid-1980s saying that there should be a theory of fundamental membranes analogous to the theory of fundamental strings. That wasn’t convincing for a large number of reasons. For one thing, a three-manifold doesn’t have an Euler characteristic, so there isn’t a topological expansion as there is in string theory. Moreover, in three dimensions there is no conformal invariance to help us make sense of membrane theory; membrane theory is nonrenormalizable just like general relativity.
This issue is the very root of the abbreviation “M-theory”:
As it has been proposed that the eleven-dimensional theory is a supermembrane theory but there are some reasons to doubt that interpretation, we will non-committally call it the M-theory, leaving to the future the relation of M to membranes. (Hořava-Witten 95)
One aspect of this is that type IIA string theory with a condensate of D0-branes behaves like a 10-dimensional theory that develops a further circular dimension of radius scaling with the density of D0-branes. (Banks-Fischler-Shenker-Susskind 97, Polchinski 99). See also (FSS 13, section 4.2).
For survey of how the components maps see also the table at Relation to F-theory.
Another hint comes from the fact that the U-duality-structure of supergravity theories forms a clear pattern in those dimensions where one understands it well, giving rise to a description of higher dimensional supergravity theories by exceptional generalized geometry. Now, this pattern, as a mathematical pattern, can be continued to the case that would correspond to the top left corner above, by passing to exceptional generalized geometry over hyperbolic Kac-Moody Lie algebras such as first E10 and then, ultimately E11. The references there show that these are huge algebraic structures inside which people incrementally find all kinds of relations that are naturally identified with various aspects of M-theory. This leads to the conjecture that M-theory somehow is in some way. But it all remains rather mysterious at the moment.
The compactification of M-theory on a torus yields type II string theory – directly type IIA, and then type IIB after T-dualizing. It turns out that the axio-dilaton of the resulting type II-B string theory is equivalently the complex structure-modulus of this elliptic fibration by the compactification torus. This gives a description of non-perturbative aspects of type II which has come to be known as F-theory (see e.g. Johnson 97).
In slightly more detail, write, topologically, for the compactification torus of M-theory, where contracting the first -factor means passing to type IIA. To obtain type IIB in noncompact 10 dimensions from M-theory, also the second is to be compactified (since T-duality sends the radius of to the inverse radius of ). Therefore type IIB sugra in is obtained from 11d sugra compactified on the torus . More generally, this torus may be taken to be an elliptic curve and this may vary over the 9d base space as an elliptic fibration.
Applying T-duality to one of the compact direction yields a 10-dimensional theory which may now be thought of as encoded by a 12-dimensional elliptic fibration. This 12d elliptic fibration encoding a 10d type II supergravity vacuum is the input data that F-theory is concerned with.
A schematic depiction of this story is the following:
|M-theory in||F-theory in|
|KK-reduction along elliptic fibration||axio-dilaton is modulus of elliptic fibration|
|IIA string theory in||T-duality||IIB string theory in|
In the simple case where the elliptic fiber is indeed just , the imaginary part of its complex modulus is
First, the KK-reduction of M-theory on yields a type IIA string coupling
Then the T-duality operation along divides this by :
|M-theory on -elliptic fibration||KK-compactification on||type IIA string theory||T-dual KK-compactification on||type IIB string theory||F-theory on elliptically fibered-K3 fibration||duality between F-theory and heterotic string theory||heterotic string theory on elliptic fibration|
|M2-brane wrapping||double dimensional reduction||type IIA superstring||type IIB superstring||heterotic superstring|
|M2-brane wrapping times around and times around||strings and D2-branes||(p,q)-string|
|M5-brane wrapping||double dimensional reduction||D4-brane||D5-brane|
|M5-brane wrapping times around and times around||D4-brane and NS5-branes||(p,q)5-brane|
|KK-monopole/A-type ADE singularity (degeneration locus of -circle fibration, Sen limit of elliptic fibration)||D6-brane||D7-branes||A-type nodal curve cycle degenertion locus of elliptic fibration (Sen 97, section 2)||SU-gauge enhancement|
|KK-monopole orientifold/D-type ADE singularity||D6-brane with O6-planes||D7-branes with O7-planes||D-type nodal curve cycle degenertion locus of elliptic fibration (Sen 97, section 3)||SO-gauge enhancement|
|exceptional ADE-singularity||exceptional ADE-singularity of elliptic fibration||E6-, E7-, E8-gauge enhancement|
Seet also at cubical structure in M-theory.
For some time though the success of string theory in 10-dimensions caused resistence to the idea of a theory of membranes in 11-dimensions, an account is in (Duff 99) and in brevity on the first pages of
The article that convinced the community of M-theory was
19:33: “Ten years ago we had the embarrassment that there were five consistent string theories plus a close cousin, which was 11-dimensional supergravity.” (19:40): “I promise you that by the end of the talk we have just one big theory.”
The term “M-theory” seems to originate in
as a “non-committed” shorthand for “membrane theory”
As it has been proposed that the eleven-dimensional theory is a supermembrane theory but there are some reasons to doubt that interpretation,1 we will non-committally call it the M-theory, leaving to the future the relation of M to membranes. (Hořava-Witten 95, p. 2)
which coined the association
the eleven-dimensional “M-theory” (where M stands for magic, mystery, or membrane, according to taste) (Witten 95, p. 1)
that later gained much publicity
The term became fully established with surveys including
Despite the magic and mystery, the relation to the original abbreviation for membrane-theory was highlighted again for instance in
More recent review includes
More technical surveys include
Sophie de Buyl, Kac-Moody Algebras in M-theory, PhD thesis (pdf)
More complete discussion of the decomposition of the supergravity C-field as one passes from 11d to 10d is in
See also the references at exceptional generalized geometry.
In fact, much of the broad structure of M-theory and its relation to the various string theory limits can be seen from the classification of exceptional super L-∞ algebras (such as the supergravity Lie 3-algebra and the supergravity Lie 6-algebra), as discussed in
By passing to automorphism algebras, this reproduces the polyvector extensions of the super Poincaré Lie algebra, which enter the traditional discussion of M-theory, such as the M-theory super Lie algebra (which arises as the symmetries of the M5-brane ∞-Wess-Zumino-Witten theory).