# nLab sigma-model -- exposition of a general abstract formulation

### Context

#### Quantum field theory

functorial quantum field theory

## Surveys, textbooks and lecture notes

#### $\infty$-Chern-Simons theory

∞-Chern-Weil theory

∞-Chern-Simons theory

∞-Wess-Zumino-Witten theory

## Examples

This is a sub-entry of sigma-model. See there for further background and context.

# Contents

## Exposition of a general abstract formulation

We give a leisurely exposition of a general abstract formulation $\sigma$-models, aimed at readers with a background in category theory but trying to assume no other prerequisites.

What is called an $n$-dimensional $\sigma$-model is first of all an instance of an $n$-dimensional quantum field theory (to be explained). The distinctive feature of those quantum field theories that are $\sigma$-models is that

1. these arise from a simpler kind of field theory – called a classical field theory – by a process called quantization

2. moreover, this simpler kind of field theory encoded bygeometric data in a nice way: it describes physical configuration spaces that are mapping spaces into a geometric space equipped with some differential geometric structure.

We give expositions of these items step-by-step:

We draw from (FHLT, section 3).

### Quantum field theory

#### Definition

For our purposes here, a quantum field theory of dimension $n$ is a symmetric monoidal functor

$Z : Bord_n^S \to \mathcal{C} \,,$

where

We think of data as follows:

• $Bord_n^S$ is a model for being and becoming in physics (following Bill Lawvere’s terminology): the objects of $Bord_n^S$ are archetypes of physical spaces that are and the morphisms are physical spaces that evolve ;

• the object $Z(\Sigma)$ that $Z$ assigns to any $(n-1)$-manifold $\Sigma$ is to be thought of as the space of all possible states over the space $\Sigma$ of a the physical system to be modeled;

• so $\mathcal{C}$ is the category of n-vector spaces among which the spaces of states of the quantum theory can be picked;

• the morphism $Z(\hat \Sigma) : Z(\Sigma_{in}) \to Z(\Sigma_{out})$ that $\Sigma$ assigns to any cobordism $\hat \Sigma$ with incoming boundary $\Sigma_{in}$ and outgoing boundary $\Sigma_{out}$ is the propagator along $\hat \Sigma$: it maps every state $\psi \in Z(\Sigma_{in})$ of the system over $\Sigma_{in}$ to the state $Z(\Psi) \in \Sigma_{out}$ that is the result of the evolution of $\psi$ along $\hat \Sigma$ by the dynamics of the system. Or conversely: the action of $Z$ encodes what this dynamics is supposed to be.

Notice that since $Z$ is required to be a symmetric monoidal functor it sends disjoint unions of manifolds to tensor products

$F(\Sigma_1 \coprod \Sigma_2) \simeq Z(\Sigma_1) \otimes Z(\Sigma_2) \,.$

Moreover, for $\hat \Sigma$ a closed cobordism, hence a morphism $\emptyset \stackrel{\hat \Sigma}{\to} \emptyset$ from the empty manifold to itself, we have that

• $Z(\emptyset) = \mathbf{1}$ is the tensor unit of $\mathcal{C}$;

• $Z(\hat \Sigma) \in End(\mathbb{1})$ is an endomorphism of this tensor unit, a number as seen internal to $\mathcal{C}$ – this is the invariant associated to $\hat \Sigma$ by $Z$, called the partition function of $Z$ over $\hat \Sigma$. We can think of $Z$ as being a rule for computing such invariants by building them up from smaller pieces. This is the locaity of quantum field theory.

#### Examples

• A simple but archetypical example is this: let $S := Riem$ be Riemannian structure. Then the category $Bord_1^{Riem}$ of 1-dimensional cobordisms equipped with Riemannian structure is generated (as a symmetric monoidal category) from intervals

$\bullet \stackrel{t}{\to} \bullet$

equipped with a length $t \in \mathbb{R}_+$. Composition is given by addition of lengths

$(\bullet \stackrel{t_1}{\to} \bullet \stackrel{t_2}{\to}) = (\bullet \stackrel{t_1 + t_2}{\to} \bullet) \,.$

Therefore a 1-dimensional Euclidean quantum field theory

$Z : Bord_1^{Riem} \to Vect$

is specified by

• a vector space $\mathcal{H}$ (“of states”) assigned to the point;

• for each $t \in \mathbb{R}_+$ a linear endomorphism

$U(t) : \mathcal{H} \to \mathcal{H}$

such that

$U(t_1 + t_2) = U(t_2) \circ U(t_1) \,.$

This is just a system of quantum mechanics. If we demand that $Z$ respects the smooth structure on the space of morphisms in $Bord_1^{Riem}$ then there will be a linear map $i H : \mathcal{H} \to \mathcal{H}$ such that

$U(t) = \exp(i H t) \,.$

This $H$ is called the Hamilton operator of the system.

(We are glossing here over some technical fine print in the definition of $Bord_1^{Riem}$. Done right we have that $\mathcal{H}$ may indeed be an infinite-dimensional vector space. See (1,1)-dimensional Euclidean field theories and K-theory)

### Classical field theory

A special class of examples of $n$-dimensional quantum field theories, as discussed above, arise as deformations or averages of similar, but simpler structure: classical field theories . The process that constructs a quantum field theory out of a classical field theory is called quantization . This is discussed below. Here we describe what a classical field theory is. We shall inevitably oversimplify the situation such as to still count as a leisurely exposition. The kind of examples that the following discussion applies to strictly are field theories of Dijkgraaf-Witten type. But despite its simplicity, this case accurately reflects most of the general abstract properties of the general theory.

For our purposes here, a classical field theory of dimension $n$ is

• $\exp(i S(-)) : Bord_n^S \to Span(Grpd, \mathcal{C}) \,,$

where

• $Bord_n^S$ is the same category of cobordisms as before;

• $Span(Grpd, \mathcal{C})$ is the category of spans of groupoids over $\mathcal{C}$:

• objects are groupoids $K$ equipped with functors $\phi : K \to \mathcal{C}$;

• morphisms $(K_1, \phi_1) \to (K_2, \phi_2)$ are diagrams

$\array{ && \hat K \\ & \swarrow && \searrow \\ K_1 &&\swArrow&& K_2 \\ & \searrow && \swarrow \\ && \mathcal{C} } \,,$

where in the middle we have a natural transformation;

• composition of morphism is by forming 2-pullbacks:

$(\hat K_2 \circ \hat K_1) = \hat K_1 \prod_{K_2} \hat K_2 \,.$

Let $\hat \Sigma : \Sigma_1 \to \Sigma_2$ be a cobordism and

$\exp(i S(-))_{\Sigma} = \left( \array{ && Conf_{\hat \Sigma} \\ & {}^{\mathllap{(-)|_{in}}}\swarrow && \searrow^{\mathrlap{(-)|_{out}}} \\ Conf_{\Sigma_1} &&\swArrow_{\exp(i S(-)_{\hat \Sigma})}&& Conf_{\Sigma_2} \\ & {}_{V_{\Sigma_1}}\searrow && \swarrow_{\mathrlap{V_{\Sigma_2}}} \\ && \mathcal{C} } \right)$

the value of a classical field theory on $\hat \Sigma$. We interpret this data as follows:

• $Conf_{\Sigma_1}$ is the configuration space of a classical field theory over $\Sigma_1$: objects are “field configurations” on $\Sigma_1$ and morphisms are gauge transformations between these. Similarly for $Conf_{\Sigma_2}$.

Here a “physical field” can be something like the electromagnetic field. But it can also be something very different. For the special case of $\sigma$-models that we are eventually getting at, a “field configuration” here will instead be a way of an particle of shape $\Sigma_1$ sitting in some target space.

• $Conf_{\hat \Sigma}$ is similarly the groupoid of field configurations on the whole cobordism, $\hat \Sigma$. If we think of an object in $Conf_{\hat \Sigma}$ of a way of a brane of shape $\Sigma_1$ sitting in some target space, then an object in $Conf_{\hat Sigma}$ is a trajectory of that brane in that target space, along which it evolves from shape $\Sigma_1$ to shape $\Sigma_2$.

• $V_{\Sigma_i} : Conf_{\Sigma_i} \to \mathcal{C}$ is the classifying map of a kind of vector bundle over configuration space: a state $\psi \in Z(\Sigma_1)$ of the quantum field theory that will be associated to this classical field theory by quantization will be a section of this vector bundle. Such a section is to be thought of as a generalization of a probability distribution on the space of classical field configurations. The generalized elements of a fiber $V_{c}$ of $V_{\Sigma_1}$ over a configuration $c \in Conf_{\Sigma_1}$ may be thought of as an internal state of the brane of shape $\Sigma_1$ sitting in target space.

• $\exp(i S(-))_{\hat \Sigma}$ is the action functional that defines the classical field theory: the component

$\exp(i S(\gamma))_{\hat \Sigma} : V_{\gamma|_{in}} \to V_{\gamma|_{out}}$

of this natural transformation on a trajectory $\gamma \in Conf_{\hat \Sigma}$ going from a configuration $\gamma|_{in}$ to a configuration $\gamma|_{out}$ is a morphism in $\mathcal{C}$ that maps the internal states of the ingoing configuration $\gamma|_{\Sigma_1}$ to the internal states of the outgoing configuration $\gamma|_{\Sigma_2}$. This evolution of internal states encodes the classical dynamics of the system.

Notice that this way a classical field theory is taken to be a special case of a quantum field theory, where the codomain of the symmetric monoidal functor is of the special form $Span(Grpd, \mathcal{C})$. For more on this see classical field theory as quantum field theory?.

### Quantization

We assume now that $\mathcal{C}$ has colimits and in fact biproducts.

Then for every functor $\phi : K \to \mathcal{C}$ the colimit

$\int^{K} \phi \in \mathcal{C}$

exists, and (using the existence of biproducts) this construction extends to a functor

$\int : Span(Grpd, \mathcal{C}) \to \mathcal{C} \,.$

We call this the path integral functor.

For

$\exp(i S(-)) : Bord_n^S \to Span(Grpd, \mathcal{C})$

a classical field theory, we get this way a quantum field theory by forming the composite functor

$Z := \int \circ \exp(i S(-)) : Bord_n^S \stackrel{\exp(i S(-))}{\to} Span(Grpd, \mathcal{C}) \stackrel{\int}{\to} \mathcal{C} \,.$

This $Z$ we call the quantization of $\exp(i S(-))$.

It acts

• on objects by sending

\begin{aligned} \Sigma_{in} & \mapsto (V_{\Sigma_{in}} : Conf_{\Sigma_{in}} \to \mathcal{C}) \\ & \mapsto \mathcal{H}_{\Sigma_{in}} := \int^K V_{\Sigma_{in}} \end{aligned}

the vector bundle on the configuration space over some boundary $\Sigma_{in}$ of worldvolume to its space $\mathcal{H}_{\Sigma_{in}}$ of gauge invariant sections. In typical situations this $\mathcal{H}_{\Sigma_{in}}$ is the famous Hilbert space of states in quantum mechanics, only that here it is allowed to be any object in $\mathcal{C}$;

• on morphisms by sending a natural transformation

\begin{aligned} \hat \Sigma & \mapsto (\exp(i S(-))_{\hat \Sigma} : \gamma \mapsto V_{\gamma|_{in}} \to V_{\gamma|_{out}}) \\ & \mapsto (\int^K \exp(i S(-))_{\hat \Sigma} : \mathcal{H}_{\Sigma_1} \to \mathcal{H}_{\Sigma_2} ) \end{aligned}

to the integral transform that it defines, weighted by the groupoid cardinality of $Conf_{\hat \Sigma}$ : the path integral .

### Classical $\sigma$-models

A classical $\sigma$-model is a classical field theory such that

• the configuration spaces $Conf_{\Sigma}$ are mapping spaces $\mathbf{H}(\Sigma,X)$ in some suitable category – some higher topos in fact – , for $X$ some fixed object of that category called target space ;

• the bundles $V_{\Sigma} : Conf_{\Sigma} \to \mathcal{C}$ “of internal states” over these mapping spaces are

One calls $(\alpha,\nabla)$ the background gauge field of the $\sigma$-model.

• The action functionals $\exp(i S(-))_{\hat \Sigma}$ are given by the higher parallel transport of $\nabla$ over $\hat \Sigma$.

So an $n$-dimensional $\sigma$-model is a classical field theory that is represented, in a sense, by a circle n-bundle with connection on some target space.

More specifically and more simply, in cases where $X$ is just a discrete ∞-groupoid – the case of sigma-models of Dijkgraaf-Witten type, every principal ∞-bundle on $X$ is necessarily flat, hence the background gauge field is given just by the morphism

$\alpha : X \to \mathbf{B}^{n} U(1) \,.$

Then for $\hat \Sigma$ a closed $n$-dimensional manifold, the action functional of the sigma-model on $\Sigma$ on a field configuration $\gamma : \hat \Sigma \to X$ has the value

$\exp(i S(\gamma))_{\hat \Sigma} = \int_{\hat \Sigma} [\alpha]$

being the evaluation of $[\alpha]$ regarded as a class in ordinary cohomology $H^n(\hat \Sigma, U(1))$ evaluated on the fundamental class of $X$.

One says that $[\alpha]$ is the Lagrangian of the theory.

(…)

## References

Created on August 3, 2011 at 16:17:44. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.