This entry is about standard round chord diagrams. For linear chord diagrams or horizontal chord diagrams or Jacobi diagrams or Sullivan chord diagrams see there.
Examples/classes:
Related concepts:
A chord diagram is a finite trivalent undirected graph with an embedded oriented circle and all vertices on that circle, regarded modulo cyclic identifications, if any.
A typical chord diagram looks like this:
graphics from Sati-Schreiber 19c
Chord diagrams are a basic object of study in combinatorics with remarkably many applications in mathematics and physics, notably in knot theory and Chern-Simons theory.
If also (trivalent) internal vertices are considered, one speaks of Jacobi diagrams.
Chord diagrams can be defined both in topological terms, which formalize the graphical intuition, as well as in purely combinatorial terms. We present only the combinatorial definition here, starting from rooted chord diagrams and using those to define unrooted chord diagrams, rather than the other way around.
(For topological definitions of both unrooted and rooted chord diagrams, see for example Chapter 6 of Lando and Zvonkin, or Definition 1.5 of Bar-Natan 1995 for the unrooted case.)
Rooted chord diagrams
If we would label the points of a chord diagram,
then the chords can be seen as describing a matching (or equivalently, an involution) on the set of marked points which pairs (or equivalently, swaps) $A$ with $C$, $B$ with $D$, and $E$ with $F$.
A subtle point is that a chord diagram can have non-trivial symmetries when considered up to this action of rotation. For that reason, in many situations it is useful to equip the circle with a distinguished basepoint (distinct from the marked points), the result being called a rooted chord diagram. Rooted chord diagrams may be conveniently visualized by “cutting open” the circle at the basepoint. For example, here we have rooted the chord diagram above at a basepoint lying on the interval AF, and opened up the circle:
The marked points of a rooted chord diagram are intrinsically equipped with a linear order ($A \lt B \lt C \lt D \lt E \lt F$) rather than a cyclic order.
Finally, it is also at times useful to consider chord diagrams with marked points which are not attached to any chord; if we think of the diagram as representing an involution, then this allows for the possibility of representing involutions with fixed points.
A rooted chord diagram of order $n$ is a surjective monotone function
from the $n$-fold coproduct of the walking arrow (seen as a 2-element poset) into the linear order $[0,2n-1] = \{ 0 \lt \dots \lt 2n-1 \}$. The symmetric group $S_n$ acts freely on the domain $[0,1] + \dots + [0,1]$ of a rooted chord diagram of order $n$, and we consider two rooted chord diagrams to be isomorphic if they only differ by precomposition with such a permutation action.
Equivalently, a rooted chord diagram of order $n$ is a way of arranging the elements of $[0,2n-1]$ into a collection of (necessarily mutually disjoint) ordered pairs $(D_{10}, D_{11}), \dots, (D_{n0},D_{n1})$, where $D_{i0} \lt D_{i1}$ for each $1 \le i \le n$.
Equivalently, a rooted chord diagram of order $n$ is a shuffle of $n$ distinct 2-letter words $\bar x x$, $\bar y y$, $\bar z z$, etc., considered up to alpha-conversion. Under this view, rooted chord diagrams are also sometimes referred to as double-occurrence words. (For example, the rooted chord diagram in the illustration above can be encoded as the double-occurrence word $\bar x \bar y x y \bar z z$.)
Unrooted chord diagrams
Intuitively, the cyclic group $C_{2n}$ acts on rooted chord diagrams
by acting on the codomain $[0,2n-1]$ via the map $\tau_n = x \mapsto x-1\,(\mod{2n})$. This is not quite well-typed, however, since the composite function $\tau_n \circ D$ is not quite order-preserving. It is easiest to define the action of $C_{2n}$ in terms of the view of a rooted chord diagram $D$ as a collection of ordered pairs $(D_{10}, D_{11}), \dots, (D_{n0},D_{n1})$. The action of $\tau_n$ is defined on each pair by
and this extends to an action on rooted chord diagrams by acting independently on the pairs.
An unrooted chord diagram of order $n$ is a rooted chord diagram of order $n$, considered up to the action of $\tau_n$.
Often one is interested in chord diagrams only modulo the 4T relation:
For $R \in$ CRing a commutative ring, let $R\langle \mathcal{D}^c \rangle$ denote the $R$-linear span of the set $\mathcal{D}^c$ of chord diagrams.
Then one traditionally writes
for the quotient spaces of the linear span of chord diagrams by the 4T relations:
Hence:
graphics from Sati-Schreiber 19c
– hence a plain $R$-valued function on the set $\mathcal{D}^c$ of chord diagrams which is invariant under the 4T relation –
is called a framed weight system. See there for more.
Given a horizontal chord diagram on $n$ strands and given any choice of cyclic permutation of $n$ elements, the trace of horizontal to round chord diagrams is the round chord diagram obtained by gluing the ends of the strands according to the cyclic permutation, and retaining the chords in the evident way.
The following graphics shows basic examples of the trace operation for cyclic permutation of strands one step to the right:
graphics from Sati-Schreiber 19c
This defines a function
from the set of horizontal chord diagrams to the set of round chord diagrams.
Every rooted chord diagram
uniquely determines a fixed point free involution
swapping the elements of each chord,
and conversely, any such involution uniquely determines a rooted chord diagram up to isomorphism. In particular, there are a double-factorial number
of distinct isomorphism classes of rooted chord diagrams of order $n$.
Every rooted chord diagram uniquely determines a chord diagram simply by forgetting the basepoint. Conversely, an unrooted chord diagram of order $n$ can be rooted in up to $2n$ different ways (corresponding to the $2n$ intervals between the marked points), but might also have fewer rootings in the case of symmetries.
chord diagrams modulo 4T are Jacobi diagrams modulo STU:
graphics from Sati-Schreiber 19c
Any knot diagram can be represented faithfully by a certain kind of chord diagram with some extra structure, known as a Gauss diagram (Polyak and Viro 1994).
Recall that classically, a knot is defined as an embedding of the circle $S^1$ into $\mathbb{R}^3$, which can be represented two-dimensionally by projecting onto the plane $\mathbb{R}^2$ and marking each double point as either an over-crossing or an under-crossing. One obtains a chord diagram from this knot diagram by considering the original immersing circle and connecting the preimages of each double point by a chord. Then, information about crossings can be represented by orienting the chords from over-crossing to under-crossing, while information about the local writhe of each crossing (in the case of a framed knot) may be encoded by assigning each chord an additional positive or negative sign. Finally, fixing a base point on the original knot gives rise to a Gauss diagram whose underlying chord diagram is naturally rooted.
Once again, this geometric object can be abstracted into a purely combinatorial one, called the Gauss code of the knot (diagram). To construct the Gauss code, begin by assigning arbitrary labels to the crossings, then run the length of the knot (starting at some arbitrary base point) and output the name of each crossing as you visit it, together with a bit (or two bits in the case of a framed knot) specifying whether you are at an over-crossing or an under-crossing (of positive or negative writhe). The underlying (rooted) chord diagram of the knot is thus encoded as a double-occurrence word.
Polyak and Viro called these “Gauss diagrams” after Carl Gauss, who apparently studied the question of which chord diagrams arise from immersions of circles (see the chapter titled “Gauss is back: curves in the plane” of Ghys’s A singular mathematical promenade). This question also played a foundational role in virtual knot theory — indeed, according to Kauffman (1999), the “fundamental combinatorial motivation” for the definition of virtual knots was the idea that it should be possible to interpret an arbitrary Gauss diagram as encoding a knot, now no longer seen as an embedding of $S^1$ into $\mathbb{R}^3$, but into a thickened surface of arbitrary genus.
By an analogous mechanism, any singular knot $K$ with $n$ simple double points (i.e., points where the knot intersects itself transversally) gives rise to a chord diagram $c(K)$ with $n$ chords, by connecting the preimages of these double points. This chord diagram $c(K)$ of course does not faithfully represent the original knot $K$ (e.g., it does not include any information about over-crossings and under-crossings). However, such chord diagrams nonetheless play an important role in the theory of Vassiliev invariants, by the theorem that the value of a Vassiliev invariant $v$ of degree $\le n$ on any singular knot $K$ with $n$ simple double points depends only on the chord diagram $c(K)$.
chord diagrams | weight systems |
---|---|
linear chord diagrams, round chord diagrams Jacobi diagrams, Sullivan chord diagrams | Lie algebra weight systems, stringy weight system, Rozansky-Witten weight systems |
Original articles:
Dror Bar-Natan, On the Vassiliev knot invariants, Topology Volume 34, Issue 2, April 1995, Pages 423-472 (doi:10.1016/0040-9383(95)93237-2, pdf)
Dror Bar-Natan, Vassiliev and Quantum Invariants of Braids, Geom. Topol. Monogr. 4 (2002) 143-160 (arxiv:q-alg/9607001)
Textbook accounts:
Sergei Chmutov, Sergei Duzhin, Jacob Mostovoy, Section 4 of: Introduction to Vassiliev knot invariants, Cambridge University Press, 2012 (arxiv:1103.5628, doi:10.1017/CBO9781139107846)
David Jackson, Iain Moffat, Section 11 of: An Introduction to Quantum and Vassiliev Knot Invariants, Springer 2019 (doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05213-3)
Lecture notes:
For chord diagrams and arc diagrams from the perspective of combinatorics, see:
Jacques Touchard, Sur un problème de configurations et sur les fractions continues Canadian Journal of Mathematics 4 (1952), 2-25. (doi)
Philippe Flajolet and Marc Noy, Analytic combinatorics of chord diagrams, INRIA technical report 3914, March 2000. (pdf)
A. Khruzin, Enumeration of chord diagrams arXiv:math/0008209, August 2000. (arxiv)
For the relationship to Gauss diagrams in classical and virtual knot theory, see:
Michael Polyak and Oleg Viro, Gauss diagram formulas for Vassiliev invariants, International Mathematics Research Notes 1994:11. pdf
Louis Kauffman, Virtual Knot Theory, European Journal of Combinatorics (1999) 20, 663-691. pdf
Oleg Viro, Virtual Links, Orientations of Chord Diagrams and Khovanov Homology, Proceedings of 12th Gökova Geometry-Topology Conference, pp. 184–209, 2005. pdf
Gauss codes at the Knot Atlas.
For the connection to Vassiliev invariants of singular knots, see:
Sergei K. Lando and Alexander K. Zvonkin, Graphs on Surfaces and Their Applications, Springer, 2004. (Chapter 6.)
Dror Bar-Natan, On the Vassiliev knot invariants, Topology 34 (1995), 423-472. (html)
Simon Willerton, Vassiliev invariants and the Hopf algebra of chord diagrams, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. (1996), 119, 55.
Greg Muller, “Chord Diagrams and Lie Algebras”, blog post at The Everything Seminar, 25 December 2007.
The following book contains an extensive discussion of chord diagrams associated to singular points of analytic curves:
On Vassiliev invariants of braids via chord diagrams:
Relation to spherical curves?:
We discuss occurrences of weight systems on chord diagrams/Jacobi diagrams in physics, specifically as correlators/Feynman amplitudes/quantum observables.
Since weight systems are the associated graded of Vassiliev invariants, and since Vassiliev invariants are knot invariants arising as certain correlators/Feynman amplitudes of Chern-Simons theory in the presence of Wilson lines, there is a close relation between weight systems and quantum Chern-Simons theory.
Historically this is the original application of chord diagrams/Jacobi diagrams and their weight systems, see also at graph complex and Kontsevich integral.
Dror Bar-Natan, Perturbative aspects of the Chern-Simons topological quantum field theory, thesis 1991 (spire:323500, proquest:303979053, BarNatanPerturbativeCS91.pdf)
Maxim Kontsevich, Vassiliev’s knot invariants, Advances in Soviet Mathematics, Volume 16, Part 2, 1993 (pdf)
Daniel Altschuler, Laurent Freidel, Vassiliev knot invariants and Chern-Simons perturbation theory to all orders, Commun. Math. Phys. 187 (1997) 261-287 (arxiv:q-alg/9603010)
Alberto Cattaneo, Paolo Cotta-Ramusino, Riccardo Longoni, Configuration spaces and Vassiliev classes in any dimension, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 2 (2002) 949-1000 (arXiv:math/9910139)
Alberto Cattaneo, Paolo Cotta-Ramusino, Riccardo Longoni, Algebraic structures on graph cohomology, Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications, Vol. 14, No. 5 (2005) 627-640 (arXiv:math/0307218)
Reviewed in:
Applied to Gopakumar-Vafa duality:
See also
Marcos Mariño, Chern-Simons theory, matrix integrals, and perturbative three-manifold invariants, Commun. Math. Phys. 253 (2004) 25-49 (arXiv:hep-th/0207096)
Stavros Garoufalidis, Marcos Mariño, On Chern-Simons matrix models (pdf, pdf)
Interpretation of Lie algebra weight systems on chord diagrams as certain single trace operators, in particular in application to black hole thermodynamics
Discussion of (Lie algebra-)weight systems on chord diagrams as SYK model single trace operators:
Antonio M. García-García, Yiyang Jia, Jacobus J. M. Verbaarschot, Exact moments of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model up to order $1/N^2$, JHEP 04 (2018) 146 (arXiv:1801.02696)
Yiyang Jia, Jacobus J. M. Verbaarschot, Section 4 of: Large $N$ expansion of the moments and free energy of Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, and the enumeration of intersection graphs, JHEP 11 (2018) 031 (arXiv:1806.03271)
Micha Berkooz, Prithvi Narayan, Joan Simón, Chord diagrams, exact correlators in spin glasses and black hole bulk reconstruction, JHEP 08 (2018) 192 (arxiv:1806.04380)
following:
which in turn follows
With emphasis on the holographic content:
Micha Berkooz, Mikhail Isachenkov, Vladimir Narovlansky, Genis Torrents, Section 5 of: Towards a full solution of the large $N$ double-scaled SYK model, JHEP 03 (2019) 079 (arxiv:1811.02584)
Vladimir Narovlansky, Slide 23 (of 28) of: Towards a Solution of Large $N$ Double-Scaled SYK, 2019 (pdf)
and specifically in relation, under AdS2/CFT1, to Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity:
Andreas Blommaert, Thomas Mertens, Henri Verschelde, The Schwarzian Theory - A Wilson Line Perspective, JHEP 1812 (2018) 022 (arXiv:1806.07765)
Andreas Blommaert, Thomas Mertens, Henri Verschelde, Fine Structure of Jackiw-Teitelboim Quantum Gravity, JHEP 1909 (2019) 066 (arXiv:1812.00918)
Discussion of weight systems on chord diagrams as single trace observables for the non-abelian DBI action on the fuzzy funnel/fuzzy sphere non-commutative geometry of Dp-D(p+2)-brane intersections (hence Yang-Mills monopoles):
Sanyaje Ramgoolam, Bill Spence, S. Thomas, Section 3.2 of: Resolving brane collapse with $1/N$ corrections in non-Abelian DBI, Nucl. Phys. B703 (2004) 236-276 (arxiv:hep-th/0405256)
Simon McNamara, Constantinos Papageorgakis, Sanyaje Ramgoolam, Bill Spence, Appendix A of: Finite $N$ effects on the collapse of fuzzy spheres, JHEP 0605:060, 2006 (arxiv:hep-th/0512145)
Simon McNamara, Section 4 of: Twistor Inspired Methods in Perturbative FieldTheory and Fuzzy Funnels, 2006 (spire:1351861, pdf, pdf)
Constantinos Papageorgakis, p. 161-162 of: On matrix D-brane dynamics and fuzzy spheres, 2006 (pdf)
graphics from Sati-Schreiber 19c
Last revised on April 29, 2020 at 02:40:31. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.