double field theory



String theory


physics, mathematical physics, philosophy of physics

Surveys, textbooks and lecture notes

theory (physics), model (physics)

experiment, measurement, computable physics




The term double field theory has come to be used for field theory (prequantum field theory/quantum field theory) on spacetimes which are T-folds (doubled geometries) hence for “T-duality-equivariant field theory”.

T-duality-covariant formalism

Para-hermitian geometry

The use of para-hermitian geometry in Double Field Theory was introduced by Izu Vaisman in (I.Vaisman 2012), then by David Svoboda (D.Svoboda 2018).


An almost para-complex manifold is a manifold MM equipped with a vector bundle endomorphism FEnd(TM)F\in\mathrm{End}(T M) such that F 2=1F^2=1 and its ±1\pm 1 eigenbundles T ±MT^\pm M have same rank.


The para-complex projectors are the canonical projectors onto T ±MT^\pm M defined by P ±=12(1±F)P_\pm = \frac{1}{2}(1\pm F)


A ±\pm-para-complex manifold is an almost para-complex manifold (M,F)(M,F) such that T ±MT^\pm M of FF is Frobenius integrable as a distribution. A para-complex manifold is a manifold that is both ++-para-complex and --para-complex.


A doubled manifold MM equipped with the O(d,d)O(d,d)-structure η\eta carries a natural almost para-hermitian structure. On patches UU with coordinates (x μ,x˜ μ)(x^\mu,\tilde{x}_\mu) we have the canonical para-complex structure

Fx μ=x μ,Fx˜ μ=x˜ μF\frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu} = \frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu},\,\, F\frac{\partial}{\partial \tilde{x}_\mu} = - \frac{\partial}{\partial \tilde{x}_\mu}

with eigenbundles

  • T +U=x μT^+U=\big\langle\frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu}\big\rangle,

  • T U=x˜ μT^-U=\big\langle\frac{\partial}{\partial \tilde{x}_\mu}\big\rangle,

with associated foliations

  • +={x μ=const}\mathcal{F}_+=\{x^\mu = \mathrm{const}\},

  • ={x˜ μ=const}\mathcal{F}_-=\{\tilde{x}_\mu = \mathrm{const}\}.

In analogy with complex geometry, if we define Ω r,s(M)\Omega^{r,s}(M) as the space of sections of Λ r(T +M)Λ s(T M)\Lambda^r(T^+M)\wedge\Lambda^s(T^-M), we have the decomposition

Ω k(M)= k=r+sΩ r,s(M) \Omega^k(M)=\bigoplus_{k=r+s}\Omega^{r,s}(M)

Let us call π r,s:Ω r+s(M)Ω r,s(M)\pi^{r,s}:\Omega^{r+s}(M)\rightarrow\Omega^{r,s}(M) the canonical projector induced by P ±P_\pm.

In analogy with complex geometry, there are para-Dolbeault operators:

  • d +=π r+1,sd:Ω r,s(M)Ω r+1,s(M)\mathrm{d}^+=\pi^{r+1,s}\circ\mathrm{d} : \Omega^{r,s}(M)\longrightarrow \Omega^{r+1,s}(M),

  • d =π r,s+1d:Ω r,s(M)Ω r,s+1(M)\mathrm{d}^-=\pi^{r,s+1}\circ\mathrm{d} : \Omega^{r,s}(M)\longrightarrow \Omega^{r,s+1}(M).

with properties:

  • d=d ++d \mathrm{d} = \mathrm{d}^+ + \mathrm{d}^-,

  • (d ±) 2=0(\mathrm{d}^\pm)^2= 0,

  • d +d +d d +=0\mathrm{d}^+\mathrm{d}^-+\mathrm{d}^-\mathrm{d}^+ =0.

We can also define Lie derivatives on the eigenbundles T ±MT^\pm M by

X ± ±ξ=(d ±ι X ±+ι X ±d ±)ξ \mathcal{L}^\pm_{X_\pm}\xi = (\mathrm{d}^\pm\iota_{X_\pm} + \iota_{X_\pm}\mathrm{d}^\pm)\xi

for any vector X ±Γ(T ±M)X_\pm\in\Gamma(T^\pm M) and ξΩ r,s(M)\xi\in\Omega^{r,s}(M).


An almost para-hermitian manifold is an almost para-complex manifold MM equipped with a compatible metric, i.e a symmetric tensor ηSym 2(TM)\eta\in\mathrm{Sym}^2(T M) such that η(F,F)=η(,)\eta(F\cdot\,,F\cdot\,)=-\eta(\,\cdot\,,\,\cdot\,).


The contraction with the metric η\eta defines two isomorphisms

ϕ ±:T ±M(T M) * \phi^\pm : T^\pm M \rightarrow (T^\mp M)^\ast


  • ϕ ±(X ±)=X ± \phi^\pm(X_\pm) = X_\pm^\flat and

  • (ϕ ±) 1(ξ ±)=ξ (\phi^\pm)^{-1}(\xi_\pm)=\xi^\sharp

that map a vector in T ±MT^\pm M to a 11-form in (T M) *(T^\mp M)^\ast and vice-versa. We used the notation ,\flat,\sharp for the musical isomorphisms induced by the metric η\eta between TMT M and T *MT^\ast M.

This can be used to define a new couple of isomorphisms

Φ ±:TMT ±M(T ±M) * \Phi^\pm : T M \longrightarrow T^\pm M\oplus(T^\pm M)^\ast

that maps a vector a vector X=X ++X X=X_++X_- with X ±T ±MX_\pm\in T^\pm M into X ++X X_+ + X_-^\flat.


A para-hermitian manifold is an almost para-hermitian manifold (M,η,F)(M,\eta,F) such that (M,F)(M,F) is a para-complex manifold.

Foliated Courant algebroid and spacetime

Given a ++-para-hermitian manifold (M,η,F)(M,\eta,F), consider the triple (T +M,[,] +,1 T +M)\big(T^+ M,[\,\cdot\,,\,\cdot\,]_+,1_{T^+M}\big) where

  • the skew-symmetric bracket [,] +:=[,]| T +M[\,\cdot\,,\,\cdot\,]_+:=[\,\cdot\,,\,\cdot\,]|_{T^+ M}

  • the anchor 1 T ±M:=1 TM| T ±M1_{T^\pm M}:=1_{T M}|_{T^\pm M} are the restrictions of Lie bracket and identity of TMT M.

Since MM is ++-para-hermitian we have that T +MT^+M is integrable and therefore it is the tangent bundle T +M=T ±T^+M = T\mathcal{F}_\pm of a foliation +\mathcal{F}_+. This means that this triple is just the tangent Lie algebroid of the foliation +\mathcal{F}_+:

(T +M,[,] +,1 T +M)=(T +,[,] T +,1 T +). \big(T^+ M,[\,\cdot\,,\,\cdot\,]_+,1_{T^+ M}\big) = \big(T\mathcal{F}_+,[\,\cdot\,,\,\cdot\,]_{T\mathcal{F}_+},1_{T\mathcal{F}_+}\big).

There is a natural Courant algebroid structure on the bundle T +M(T +M) *T^+ M\oplus(T^+ M)^\ast with skew-symmetric pairing

[X+α,Y+β] +=[X,Y] ++ X +β Y +α+d +(ι Yα) [X+\alpha,Y+\beta]_{+} = [X,Y]_+ + \mathcal{L}_X^+\beta -\mathcal{L}_Y^+\alpha +\mathrm{d}_+(\iota_Y\alpha)

and symmetric pairing

X+α,Y+β +=ι Xβ+ι Yα. \langle X+\alpha,Y+\beta\rangle_+ = \iota_X\beta + \iota_Y\alpha.

The isomorphism Φ +:T +M(T +M) *T +MT M=TM\Phi^+:T^+ M\oplus (T^+ M)^\ast\rightarrow T^+ M\oplus T^- M = T M previously defined induces a Courant algebroid isomorphism and hence a Courant algebroid structure on TMT M. This induces a metric η\eta on MM and a skew-symmetric pairing on TMT M by

[[X ++X ,Y ++Y ]] +:=[X +,Y +]+[ X + +Y Y + +X +d +(η(X ,Y +))] , [[X_++X_-,Y_++Y_-]]_+ := [X_+,Y_+] + \Big[\mathcal{L}_{X_+}^+ Y_-^\flat -\mathcal{L}_{Y_+}^+ X_-^\flat +\mathrm{d}_+\big(\eta(X_-,Y_+)\big)\Big]^\sharp,

where XTMX\in T M is split in X ±=P ±XX_\pm=P_\pm X.


Since MM is assumed ++-para-hermitian, T +M(T +M) *T^+ M\oplus (T^+ M)^\ast can be written as T +T * +T\mathcal{F}_+\oplus T^\ast\mathcal{F}_+. Therefore we constructed an isomorphism between the Courant algebroid on the whole TMT M and the generalized tangent bundle T +T * +T\mathcal{F}_+\oplus T^\ast\mathcal{F}_+ of the foliation. In other terms para-hermitian geometry of the doubled manifold MM reduces to Generalized Geometry of physical spacetime.


The same argument can be clearly applied to T MT^-M too.


In previous section we assumed that the +1+1-eigenbundle T +MT^+M is integrable. This is equivalent to assuming that there exists a well defined foliation that can be interpreted as the physical spacetime. However it is possible to construct a more general bracket that does not require such an assumption, but only an almost para-complex structure. Therefore it works even when a global physical spacetime foliation is not defined. This is achieved by Vaisman with the definition of C-bracket by using a generalization of the notion of Levi-Civita connection (look (I.Vaisman 2012)).

In the special case of an (inetgrable) para-hermitian manifold C-bracket is given by

[[X+α,Y+β]] C=[X,Y]+ Xβ Yα+d(η(X+α,Y+β))+[α,β] *+ α *Y β *Xd *(η(X+α,Y+β)) [[ X+\alpha,Y+\beta ]]_{\mathrm{C}} = [X,Y] + \mathcal{L}_X\beta -\mathcal{L}_Y\alpha + \mathrm{d}\big(\eta(X+\alpha,Y+\beta)\big) + [\alpha,\beta]^\ast + \mathcal{L}^\ast_\alpha Y -\mathcal{L}^\ast_\beta X - \mathrm{d}^\ast\big(\eta(X+\alpha,Y+\beta)\big)

where [,][\,\cdot\,,\,\cdot\,], X\mathcal{L}_X and d\mathrm{d} are usual Lie bracket, Lie derivative and differential on T +T\mathcal{F}_+. On the other hand [,] *[\,\cdot\,,\,\cdot\,]^\ast, α *\mathcal{L}^\ast_\alpha and d *\mathrm{d}^\ast are Lie bracket, Lie derivative and differential on T + *T\mathcal{F}_+^\ast induced by the former ones.

Analogy with geometric quantization

The analogy between geometric quantization and DFT was firstly noticed by David Berman.

Given a symplectic manifold (M,ω)(M,\omega) there exist couples of lagrangian foliations +, \mathcal{F}_+,\mathcal{F}_- of MM defined by

X,YT ±,ω(X,Y)=0. \forall X,Y\in T\mathcal{F}_\pm, \: \omega(X,Y)=0.

For example for a symplectic space ( 2d,ω=dx μdp μ)(\mathbb{R}^{2d},\omega=\mathrm{d}x^\mu\wedge\mathrm{d}p_\mu) we can have +={x μ=const}\mathcal{F}_+ = \{x^\mu = \mathrm{const} \} and ={p μ=const}\mathcal{F}_-= \{p_\mu = \mathrm{const} \}. But notice that any symplectic rotation of this choice is a couple of lagrangian foliations that works fine.

Heuristically, in geometrical quantization we make a choice of a couple of lagrangian foliations ±\mathcal{F}_\pm to “select” a physical spacetime +\mathcal{F}_+ from the whole symplectic-covariant theory on MM.

Similarly in DFT, when MM is an (integrable) para-hermitian manifold we make a choice of a couple of lagrangian foliations ±\mathcal{F}_\pm to “select” a physical spacetime +\mathcal{F}_+ from the whole T-duality-covariant theory on MM.


The idea of “doubled spacetime geometry” is a variant of the idea of T-folds, due to

The coinage of the term “double field theory” for field theory on such doubled geometry goes back to

Discussion in the context of L-infinity algebra includes

Comprehensive discussion in higher differential geometry:

Discussion of an extended version of Riemannian geometry suitable for the description of double field theory

Discussion about para-Hermitian formalism started in

  • Izu Vaisman, On the geometry of double field theory Journal of Mathematical Physics 53, 033509 (2012) (arXiv:1203.0836)

Para-Hermitian formalism further developed and generalized in

  • David Svoboda, Algebroid structures on para-Hermitian manifolds Journal of Mathematical Physics 59, 122302 (2018) (arxiv:1802.08180)

Last revised on March 16, 2020 at 21:07:40. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.