This page is about the associative unital algebra and $\mathbb{N}$-graded module that is isomorphic to a Clifford algebra. For the book by Emil Artin see instead at Geometric Algebra.
symmetric monoidal (∞,1)-category of spectra
higher geometry / derived geometry
Ingredients
Concepts
geometric little (∞,1)-toposes
geometric big (∞,1)-toposes
Constructions
Examples
derived smooth geometry
Theorems
superalgebra and (synthetic ) supergeometry
spin geometry, string geometry, fivebrane geometry …
rotation groups in low dimensions:
see also
This definition is a modified version of the one given in Aragón, Aragón, Rodríguez (1997)
Given a commutative ring $R$, a geometric algebra is an $\mathbb{N}$-graded $R$-module $A$ with an associative unital bilinear function $(-)(-):A \times A \to A$ and a ring isomorphism $j:\langle A \rangle_0 \cong R$ such that
for natural numbers $m:\mathbb{N}$ and $n:\mathbb{N}$, the product of every $m$-multivector and $n$-multivector is an $(m+n)$-multivector: for all $a \in \vert A \vert_m$ and $b \in \vert A \vert_n$, there exists $c \in \vert A \vert_{m+n}$ such that $a b = c$
the product of every $1$-vector with itself is a $0$-vector: for all $a \in \langle A \rangle_1$ there exists $c \in \langle A \rangle_0$ such that $a^2 = c$.
The $0$-vectors are typically called scalars and $1$-vectors are just called vectors. An $n$-blade is an $n$-vector which could be written as a product of $n$ $1$-vectors.
The categories of $R$-geometric algebras and $R$-Clifford algebras are equivalent, similar to how the categories of abelian groups and $\mathbb{Z}$-modules are equivalent. As a result, geometric algebras and Clifford algebras are isomorphic algebras, and the two terms are interchangeable with each other. In fact, Clifford originally named Clifford algebras “geometric algebras”, and it was later mathematicians who started using the term “Clifford algebra” for this object.
The use of the term “geometric algebra” rather than “Clifford algebra” for this object continues in physics in a school of thought following Hestenes 66 that emphasizes the usefulness of making this abstract algebra explicit in the exposition of geometry and physics, such as on 2- and 3-dimensional Cartesian spaces and on Minkowski spacetime, and in physics, “geometric algebra” also refers to this school of thought.
In physics, geometric algebra may be seen as a third style of exposition and notation, in between 1) the traditional physics style of regarding the Clifford algebra in terms of matrix representations, and 2) the traditional mathematics style of defining them as quotients of tensor algebras by ideals defined by quadratic forms. The idea is that while the former approach (1) suffers from its basis-dependency, the latter approach (2) tends to make the subject look more complicated to the novice and working physicist than it really is.
In textbooks on geometric algebra, the algebra is instead introduced without choosing matrix representations, but highlighting the obvious generators and relations-presentation over the definition via quotients of tensor algebras. (The general theory of Clifford algebras, including core results such as Bott periodicity, is typically not mentioned in textbooks on geometric algebra). While the difference may seem inessential to the trained mathematician, it turns out that this perspectives helps open the subject to many working physicists. The enthusiasm about this perspective that David Hestenes reports to have experienced when he understood Clifford algebra in physics this way, back as a student, is what made geometric algebra become the school of thought that is today.
One point being made here is that the traditional physics textbook emphasis on the special geometry of the Cartesian space $\mathbb{R}^3$ with its exceptional vector product structure is outdated and contra-productive and can be replaced by a more elegant and more universal description in terms of bivector calculus (which canonically embeds into the Clifford algebra). In this respect geometric algebra may be thought of as a streamlined exposition of the geometry of rotation and spin.
On the definition of geometric algebras
The original account:
Other accounts:
Chris Doran, Geometric Algebra and its Application to Mathematical Physics, 1994 (pdf)
Garrett Sobczyk, New Foundations in Mathematics: The Geometric Concept of Number. New York (2013)
A textbook on mechanics written in this style is
See also
Last revised on May 10, 2022 at 17:53:10. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.