This page is about Clifford algebra and physics. For the book by Emil Artin see instead at Geometric Algebra.
symmetric monoidal (∞,1)-category of spectra
higher geometry / derived geometry
geometric little (∞,1)-toposes
geometric big (∞,1)-toposes
function algebras on ∞-stacks?
derived smooth geometry
superalgebra and (synthetic ) supergeometry
spin geometry, string geometry, fivebrane geometry …
rotation groups in low dimensions:
see also
Geometric algebra, or geometric numbers in Sobczyk 13, is essentially a synonym for Clifford algebra, specifically over the ground field of real numbers, or, to some extent, for the spin geometry formulated in terms of such Clifford algebra. The term “geometric algebra” is used and preferred in a school of thought following Hestenes 66 that emphasizes the usefulness of making abstract Clifford algebra explicit in the exposition of geometry and physics, such as on 2- and 3-dimensional Cartesian spaces and on Minkowski spacetime.
The perspective of “geometric algebra” may be seen as a third style of exposition and notation, in between 1) the traditional physics style of regarding Clifford algebra in terms of matrix representations, and 2) the traditional mathematics style of defining them as quotients of tensor algebras by ideals defined by quadratic forms. The idea is that while the former approach (1) suffers from its basis-dependency, the latter approach (2) tends to make the subject look more complicated to the novice and working physicist than it really is.
In textbooks on “geometric algebra”, Clifford algebra is instead introduced without choosing matrix representations, but highlighting the obvious generators and relations-presentation over the definition via quotients of tensor algebras. (The general theory of Clifford algebras, including core results such as Bott periodicity, is typically not mentioned in textbooks on “geometric algebra”). While the difference may seem inessential to the trained mathematician, it turns out that this perspectives helps open the subject to many working physicists. The enthusiasm about this perspective that David Hestenes reports to have experienced when he understood Clifford algebra in physics this way, back as a student, is what made “geometric algebra” become the school of thought that is today.
One point being made here is that the traditional physics textbook emphasis on the special geometry of the Cartesian space $\mathbb{R}^3$ with its exceptional vector product structure is outdated and contra-productive and can be replaced by a more elegant and more universal description in terms of bivector calculus (which canonically embeds into the Clifford algebra). In this respect geometric algebra may be thought of as a streamlined exposition of the geometry of rotation and spin.
The original textbook is
Other accounts:
Chris Doran, Geometric Algebra and its Application to Mathematical Physics, 1994 (pdf)
Garrett Sobczyk?, New Foundations in Mathematics: The Geometric Concept of Number. New York (2013)
A textbook on mechanics written in this style is
See also
Last revised on June 18, 2021 at 20:49:55. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.