higher geometry / derived geometry
Ingredients
Concepts
geometric little (∞,1)-toposes
geometric big (∞,1)-toposes
Constructions
Examples
derived smooth geometry
Theorems
In general, a perturbative string theory vacuum is defined by a worldsheet 2d SCFT, regarded as the formal dual (“2-spectral triple”) of the corresponding emergent target spacetime.
Some such 2d SCFTs arise as sigma-models from actual differential geometric pseudo-Riemannian spacetime manifolds with differential geometric background fields on them. These are hence called the geometric vacua or geometric backgrounds.
All other vacua are then called non-geometric backgrounds. These are defined only Isbell-dually in terms of vertex operator algebra on the worldsheet. For instance a symmetry of a non-geometric background is dually an automorphism of a vertex operator algebra.
In the point-particle limit, these non-geometric string vacua correspond to spectral triples that are defined purely algebraically, such as the non-geometric fiber spaces in the Connes-Lott model.
backgrounds of the exotic branes
Strictly speaking, the perturbative string theory vacua of heterotic string theory are all non-geometric, even if the apparent target spacetime is plain Minkowski spacetime:
The 2d SCFT defining the heterotic string is the direct sum of two rather different chiral halves:
the holomorphic part, say, is one chiral half of a superstring sigma model on 10d Minkowski spacetime
the antiholomorphic part is one chiral half of the bosonic string on a 26d-dimensional Minkowski spacetime that is compactified on the Leech lattice.
While the direct sum of these two super vertex operator algebras is again a consistent super vertex operator algebra, in this combination this is not a sigma-model anymore, even if its two halves do arise in (two distinct!) sigma-models.
Analogous statements hold for most rational CFT-constructions of perturbative string theory vacua. Even if parts of these algebras arise as chiral half of sigma-models (notably WZW models), the way they are put together chirally yields a non-geometric construction that defines a non-geometric perturbative string theory vacuum.
duality between algebra and geometry
in physics:
We list references that use the “non-geometric”-terminology. But notice that all rational 2d CFT/Gepner model compactifications discussed in the 1990s are “non-geometric”, but the term wasn’t around then. Hence see the references at Gepner model for more.
Alex Flournoy, Brian Wecht, Brook Williams, Constructing Nongeometric Vacua in String Theory, Nucl.Phys.B706:127-149, 2005 (arXiv:hep-th/0404217)
Katrin Becker, Melanie Becker, Cumrun Vafa, Johannes Walcher, Moduli Stabilization in Non-Geometric Backgrounds, Nucl. Phys. B 770 (2007) 1-46 [arXiv:hep-th/0611001]
Erik Plauschinn, Non-geometric backgrounds in string theory, j.physrep.2018.12.002 (arXiv:1811.11203)
Dan Israel, Mirrored K3 automorphisms and non-geometric compactifications 2018 (pdf)
Non-geometric heterotic string vacua
Jock McOrist, David Morrison, Savdeep Sethi, Geometries, Non-Geometries, and Fluxes (arXiv:1004.5447)
Anamaría Font, Christoph Mayrhofer, Non-Geometric Vacua of the Heterotic String and Little String Theories (arXiv:1708.05428)
Anamaría Font, Iñaki García-Etxebarria, Dieter Lüst, Stefano Massai, Christoph Mayrhofer, Heterotic T-fects, 6D SCFTs, and F-Theory, JHEP08(2016)175 (arXiv:1603.09361)
Iñaki García-Etxebarria, Dieter Lüst, Stefano Massai, Christoph Mayrhofer, Ubiquity of non-geometry in heterotic compactifications, JHEP03(2017)046 (arXiv:1611.10291)
Non-geometric flux compactification:
Anamaria Font, Adolfo Guarino, Jesus M. Moreno, Algebras and non-geometric flux vacua, JHEP 0812:050, 2008 (arXiv:0809.3748)
David Andriot, Andre Betz, Supersymmetry with non-geometric fluxes, or a β-twist in Generalized Geometry and Dirac operator (arXiv:1411.6640)
Stefano Risoli, On non-geometric string vacua, 2016 (pdf)
Chris Hull, A Geometry for Non-Geometric String Backgrounds (arXiv:hep-th/0406102)
Chris Hull, Global Aspects of T-Duality, Gauged Sigma Models and T-Folds (arXiv:hep-th/0604178)
Aaron Bergman, Daniel Robbins, Ramond-Ramond Fields, Cohomology and Non-Geometric Fluxes (arXiv:0710.5158)
Dieter Lüst, Stefano Massai, Valentí Vall Camell, The monodromy of T-folds and T-fects (arXiv:1508.01193)
Mark Bugden, Non-abelian T-folds (arXiv:1901.03782)
Yoan Gautier, Chris Hull, Dan Israël, Heterotic/type II Duality and Non-Geometric Compactifications (arXiv:1906.02165)
Hyungrok Kim, Christian Saemann: Non-Geometric T-Duality as Higher Groupoid Bundles with Connections [arXiv:2204.01783, spire:2063353]
Last revised on October 17, 2024 at 08:16:15. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.