topology (point-set topology, point-free topology)
see also differential topology, algebraic topology, functional analysis and topological homotopy theory
Basic concepts
fiber space, space attachment
Extra stuff, structure, properties
Kolmogorov space, Hausdorff space, regular space, normal space
sequentially compact, countably compact, locally compact, sigma-compact, paracompact, countably paracompact, strongly compact
Examples
Basic statements
closed subspaces of compact Hausdorff spaces are equivalently compact subspaces
open subspaces of compact Hausdorff spaces are locally compact
compact spaces equivalently have converging subnet of every net
continuous metric space valued function on compact metric space is uniformly continuous
paracompact Hausdorff spaces equivalently admit subordinate partitions of unity
injective proper maps to locally compact spaces are equivalently the closed embeddings
locally compact and second-countable spaces are sigma-compact
Theorems
Analysis Theorems
Classical groups
Finite groups
Group schemes
Topological groups
Lie groups
Super-Lie groups
Higher groups
Cohomology and Extensions
Related concepts
A localic group is a group object internal to locales.
As the notion of locale is a point-free version of that of topological space, a localic group is much like a topological group, but there are some differences.
The further generalization to groupoids is that of localic groupoids.
A localic group is a group object in the category of locales. More explicitly, this means we have a locale $G$ with continuous maps $\epsilon:1 \to G$, $\iota:G \to G$, and $\mu:G \times G \to G$, such that $(\mathrm{id}_G, m) \circ m = (m, \mathrm{id}_G) \circ m$, $(\mathrm{id}_G, u_G^1 \circ \epsilon) \circ m = \mathrm{id}_G$, $(u_G^1 \circ \epsilon, \mathrm{id}_G) \circ m = \mathrm{id}_G$, $(\iota, \mathrm{id}_G) \circ m = u_G^1 \circ \epsilon$, and $(\mathrm{id}_G, \iota) \circ m = u_G^1 \circ \epsilon$, where $1$ is the terminal locale and $u_G^1:G \to 1$ is the unique map into $1$.
Localic groups are similar to topological groups, and many examples can be considered as either one. For instance, the real numbers $\mathbb{R}$ under addition can be considered as either a topological group or a localic group.
Since the “space of points” functor $Loc \to Top$ is a right adjoint, it preserves limits and hence group objects, so every localic group has an underlying topological group. However, this functor can discard information; for instance, IKPR constructs a nontrivial localic group with only one point.
Moreover, the “locale of opens” functor $Top\to Loc$ does not preserve products, so not every topological group is a localic group—even if its underlying topological space is sober (hence is the space of points of some locale). In particular, the locale $\mathbb{Q}$ of rational numbers (with topology induced from that of $\mathbb{R}$) is not a localic group under addition, because the locale product $\mathbb{Q}\times_l \mathbb{Q}$ is “bigger” than the topological-space product (and in particular is not spatial), and the addition map $\mathbb{Q}\times \mathbb{Q}\to \mathbb{Q}$ cannot be extended to the locale product.
But if $G$ is a locally compact topological group (such as $\mathbb{R}$), then the space product $G\times G$ does agree with the locale product (using the ultrafilter principle in the proof), and hence $G$ is also a localic group.
A remarkable fact about localic groups is the following (Corollary C5.3.2 of the Elephant; this also proves that $\mathbb{Q}$ cannot be a localic group):
Any overt localic subgroup of a localic group is weakly closed. If the ambient localic group is in a Boolean topos then any localic subgroup is a closed subgroup.
Details can be found in C5.3.1 of the Elephant, in the more general case of localic groupoids. The basic idea of the proof is to use the fact that the intersection of any two dense sublocales is again dense (a fact which very much fails for topological spaces).
If $H\rightarrowtail G$ is a localic subgroup, we construct its closure $\bar{H}$, which is also a localic subgroup in which $H$ is dense. By pullback, it follows that $H\times \bar{H} \to \bar{H} \times \bar{H}$ is fiberwise dense? over $\bar{H}$ via the second projection. Applying the automorphism $(g,h) \mapsto (g,g^{-1}h)$ of $G\times G$, we conclude that $H\times \bar{H} \to \bar{H} \times \bar{H}$ is also fiberwise dense over $\bar{H}$ via the “composition” map. Dually, $\bar{H}\times H \to \bar{H} \times \bar{H}$ is also fiberwise dense over $\bar{H}$ via the “composition” map, and thus (by the basic fact cited above), so is their intersection, which is $H\times H$. Since $\bar{H}\times \bar{H}\to \bar{H}$ is an epimorphism, so is $H\times H\to\bar{H}$. But this map factors through $H\rightarrowtail \bar{H}$ (since $H$ is itself a subgroup of $G$), so that inclusion is also epic. But it is also a regular monomorphism, and hence an isomorphism; thus $H$ is closed.
The Elephant, chapter C5.
John Isbell, Igor Křiž, Aleš Pultr, Jiři Rosický, Remarks on Localic Groups, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1348 (1988), pp. 154-172: doi
An expository account of the closed subgroup theorem can be found in
Last revised on November 16, 2022 at 15:28:42. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.