The notion of locale is a “point-less” version of that of topological space. A localic group is much like a topological group, but there are some differences. For a groupoid generalization see localic groupoid.
A localic group is a group object in the category of locales.
Localic groups are similar to topological groups, and many examples can be considered as either one. For instance, the real numbers $\mathbb{R}$ under addition can be considered as either a topological group or a localic group.
Since the “space of points” functor $Loc \to Top$ is a right adjoint, it preserves limits and hence group objects, so every localic group has an underlying topological group. However, this functor can discard information; for instance, IKPR constructs a nontrivial localic group with only one point.
Moreover, the “locale of opens” functor $Top\to Loc$ does not preserve products, so not every topological group is a localic group—even if its underlying topological space is sober (hence is the space of points of some locale). In particular, the locale $\mathbb{Q}$ of rational numbers (with topology induced from that of $\mathbb{R}$) is not a localic group under addition, because the locale product $\mathbb{Q}\times_l \mathbb{Q}$ is “bigger” than the topological-space product (and in particular is not spatial), and the addition map $\mathbb{Q}\times \mathbb{Q}\to \mathbb{Q}$ cannot be extended to the locale product.
But if $G$ is a locally compact topological group (such as $\mathbb{R}$), then the space product $G\times G$ does agree with the locale product (using the ultrafilter principle in the proof), and hence $G$ is also a localic group.
A remarkable fact about localic groups is the following (which also proves that $\mathbb{Q}$ cannot be a localic group):
Any localic subgroup of a localic group is weakly closed. If the ambient localic group is in a Boolean topos then any localic subgroup is closed.
Details can be found in C5.3.1 of the Elephant, in the more general case of localic groupoids. The basic idea of the proof is to use the fact that the intersection of any two dense sublocales is again dense (a fact which very much fails for topological spaces).
If $H\rightarrowtail G$ is a localic subgroup, we construct its closure $\bar{H}$, which is also a localic subgroup in which $H$ is dense. By pullback, it follows that $H\times \bar{H} \to \bar{H} \times \bar{H}$ is fiberwise dense? over $\bar{H}$ via the second projection. Applying the automorphism $(g,h) \mapsto (g,g^{-1}h)$ of $G\times G$, we conclude that $H\times \bar{H} \to \bar{H} \times \bar{H}$ is also fiberwise dense over $\bar{H}$ via the “composition” map. Dually, $\bar{H}\times H \to \bar{H} \times \bar{H}$ is also fiberwise dense over $\bar{H}$ via the “composition” map, and thus (by the basic fact cited above), so is their intersection, which is $H\times H$. Since $\bar{H}\times \bar{H}\to \bar{H}$ is an epimorphism, so is $H\times H\to\bar{H}$. But this map factors through $H\rightarrowtail \bar{H}$ (since $H$ is itself a subgroup of $G$), so that inclusion is also epic. But it is also a regular monomorphism, and hence an isomorphism; thus $H$ is closed.
The Elephant, chapter C5.
Isbell, Křiž, Pultr and Rosický, Remarks on Localic Groups
Last revised on February 26, 2018 at 04:41:22. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.