This entry is about the concept in physics. For the concept in algebra see at free field.
, ,
,
,
, ,
, , , ,
,
,
,
,
Axiomatizations
theorem
Tools
,
,
Structural phenomena
Types of quantum field thories
,
, ,
examples
, , , ,
, ,
 (abelian )
, ,  ()
 ()
 of
(, )
( of the above )
bosinos:
 of ()

:
Exotica
,
,
A field theory in physics is called a free field theory if it describes standard dynamics of fields without any interaction. Otherwise it is called an interacting field theory.
There is some freedom in formalizing precisely what this means. At the very least the equations of motion of a free field theory should be linear differential equations. In relativistic field theory over a Lorentzian spacetime one typically requires that the linear differential equation of motion is, after gauge fixing, in fact the wave equation or KleinGordon equation.
We describe free field theory in the language of covariant phase spaces of local Lagrangians and their multisymplectic geometry.
Let $\Sigma = (\mathbb{R}^{d1;1}, \eta)$ be Minkowski spacetime. Write the canonical coordinates as
Let $(X,g)$ be a vector space $X$ equipped with a bilinear form $g$ that makes it a Riemannian manifold. Write its canonical coordinates as
Let then $X \times \Sigma \to \Sigma$ be the field bundle. Its first jet bundle then has canonical coordinates
The local Lagrangian for free field theory with this field bundle is
The canonical momentumdensities for the free field local Lagrangian of def. are
So the boundary term $\theta$ in variational calculus, (see this remark at covariant phase space ) is
where in the last line we adopted the notation of this remark at multisymplectic geometry.
This shows that the canonical multisymplectic form is the “covariant symplectic potential current density” which is induced by the free field Lagrangian.
In the formalization of perturbation theory via BVquantization as in (CostelloGwilliam), a free field theory is given by a BVcomplex that arises from the following data.
The following appears for instance as (Gwilliam 2.6.2).
A free field theory (local, Lagrangian) is the following data
A smooth manifold $X$ (“spacetime”/“worldvolume”);
a $\mathbb{Z}$graded complex vector bundle $E \to X$ (the “field bundle” containing also in general antifields and ghosts);
equipped with a bundle homomorphism (the “antibracket density”)
from the fiberwise tensor product of $E$ with itself to the compex density bundle which is fiberwise
nondegenerate
antisymmetric
of degree 1
(See also at Verdier duality.)
Write $\mathcal{E}_c \coloneqq \Gamma_{cp}(E)$ for the space of sections of the field bundle of compact support. Write
for the induced pairing on sections
The paring being nondegenerate means that we have an isomorphism $E \stackrel{\simeq}{\to} E^* \otimes Dens_X$ and we write
A differential operator on sections of the field bundle
of degree 1 such that
$(\mathcal{E}, Q)$ is an elliptic complex;
$Q$ is selfadjoint with respect to $\langle ,\rangle$ in that for all fields $\phi,\psi \in \mathcal{E}_c$ of homogeneous degree we have $\langle \phi , Q \psi\rangle = (1)^{{\vert \phi\vert}} \langle Q \phi, \psi\rangle$.
From this data we obtain:
The action functional $S \colon \mathcal{E}_c \to \mathbb{C}$ of this corresponding free field theory is
The classical BVcomplex is the symmetric algebra $Sym \mathcal{E}^!_c$ of compactly suppported sections of $E^!$ equipped with the induced action of the differential $Q$ and the pairing
See below at The classical observables for more.
is the deformation of the above to the symmetric algebra tensored with the formal power series in $\hbar$ (“Planck's constant”) $Sym(\mathcal{E}^!)[ [\hbar] ]$ and differential $Q + \hbar \Delta$ with BVLaplacian defined to vanish on $Sym^{\leq 1}$, given by
for $\alpha,\beta \in \mathcal{E}^!$ and extended by the formula
See below at The quantum observables for more.
A closed element $\mathcal{O} \in Obs^q$ is an observable and its formal path integral expectation value $\langle \mathcal{O}\rangle$ is its image in the cochain cohomology $H^\bullet Obs^q$. Via the homological perturbation lemma this may be computed in perturbation theory (order by order in $\hbar$) in terms of Feynman diagrams.
In a nonfree field theory the differential would have an additional perturbation of the complex by an interaction term $I$ to
$\exp(S(\phi)) \cdot \mu =$  $\exp((\phi, Q \phi)) \cdot$  $\exp(I(\phi)) \cdot$  $\mu$ 
+  with interaction +  
$d_q =$  $Q$ +  $\{I,\}$ +  $\hbar \Delta$ 
For $(E, Q, \langle, \rangle_{loc})$ a free field theory, def. , write
and accordingly write $\overline{\mathcal{E}^!}$ for its distributional sections. This is the distributional dual to the smooth sections $\mathcal{E}$ of $E$.
The complex of global classical observables of the free field theory $(E,Q, \langle, \rangle_{loc})$ is the classical BVcomplex
given by the symmetric algebra of dual sections and quipped with the dual of the differential (which we denote by the same letter) defined on generators and then extended as a graded derivation to the full symmetric algebra.
The factorization algebra of local classical observables is the cosheaf of these observables which assigns to $U \subset X$ the complex
in (Gwilliam), this is def. 5.3.6.
There is a canonical BVquantization of the above classical observable of a free field theory given by defining the BV Laplacian as follows.
For $(E, Q, \langle ,\rangle_{loc})$ a free field theory, def. , the standard BV Laplacian
is given on generators $a,b \in Sym^1 \mathcal{E}^!_c$ of homogeneous degree by
and then extended to arbitrary elements by the formula
In (Gwilliam) this is construction 2.4.9 (also construction 3.1.6, and section 5.3.3).
For $(E, Q, \langle ,\rangle_{loc})$ a free field theory, def. its complex of quantum observables is then the corresponding quantum BVcomplex deformation of the classical BVcomplex, def. , given by the standard BVLaplacian of def.
In (Gwilliam) this is def. 5.3.9.
We characterize the cochain complex $Obs^q$ of quantum observables of def. by an equivalent but small complex built from just the cochain cohomology of the elliptic complex of fields $(\mathcal{E}, Q)$.
For $(E, Q, \langle ,\rangle_{loc})$ a free field theory, def. , the global pairing constitutes a dgsymplectic vector space $(\mathcal{E}, Q, \langle ,\rangle)$, which descends to the cochain cohomology to a graded symplectic vector space $(H^\bullet(\mathcal{E}, \langle ,\rangle)$; hence by def. there is a standard BVLaplacian $\Delta_{H^\bullet\mathcal{E}}$. Write
for the corresponding quantum BVcomplex.
This is part of (Gwilliam, prop. 2.4.10, prop. 5.5.1),
Handle the following with care for the moment.
For a free field theory $(E,Q,\langle, \rangle_{loc})$, def. , the complex of quantum observables $Obs^q$, def. is quasiisomorphic to the BVquantization of the cohomology of the field complex, given by def.
This is (Gwilliam, prop. 5.5.1).
The proof is supposedly along the lines of (Gwilliam, section 2.5), applying the homological perturbation lemma.
The bracket $\{,\}$ on the complex of quantum observables $Obs^q$ of def. descends to a bracket on cochain cohomology, making $(H^\bullet (Obs^q), \{,\})$ into a graded symplectic vector space.
Let $a,b \in Obs^q$ be closed elements of homogeneous degree. Then by the compatibly of $\Delta$ with $\{,\}$ also $\{a,b\}$ is closed:
Let in addition $c \in Obs^q$ be any element. Then
and hence the cohomology class of $\{a,b\}$ is independent of the representative cocycle $b$, and similarly for $a$.
A degenerate but instructive class of examples to compare to is the case where $X = *$ is the 0dimensional connected manifold: the point. (See (Gwilliam 2.3.1)).
In this case
is the direct sum of a vector space and its formal dual shifted in degree. The pairing is the canonical pairing between a vector space and its dual.
If $\{x^i \colon V \to \mathbb{R}\}_i$ is a basis for functional on $V$ and $\{\xi_i\}$ is the corresponding basis of functions on $V^*[1]$, then the antibracket in this case is
The BVLaplacian in this basis is
The action functional is a Gaussian distribution over $V$ defined by a matrix $A = (a_{i j})$. The corresponding differential is
Hence for a field of the form
we have the action functional
Some sigmamodel quantum field theories have the property that they are fee locally on their target spaces. Under good conditions then quantization of free field theory locally yields a sheaf of quantum observables on target space from which the full quantization of the field theory may be reconstructed.
A famous example of this is the topologically twisted2d (2,0)superconformal QFT (see there for more, and see (Gwilliam, section 6 for the description in terms of factorization algebras).
Discussion of free field theories and their quantization on globally hyperbolic Lorentzian manifolds is in
Discussion on Euclidean manifolds and in terms of BVformalism is in
Kevin Costello, Owen Gwilliam, Factorization algebras in perturbative quantum field theory (wiki, pdf)
Owen Gwilliam, Factorization algebras and free field theories PhD thesis (pdf)
Owen Gwilliam, Rune Haugseng, Linear BatalinVilkovisky quantization as a functor of ∞categories (arXiv:1608.01290)
Last revised on January 9, 2018 at 09:32:59. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.