nLab double dimensional reduction

Contents

Idea

What is called double dimensional reduction is a variant of Kaluza-Klein mechanism combined with fiber integration in the presence of branes: given a spacetime of dimension d+1d+1 in which a p+1p+1-brane propagates, its KK-reduction results in a dd-dimensional effective spacetime containing a p+1p+1-brane together with a “doubly reduced” pp-brane, which is the reduction of those original (p+1)(p+1)-brane configurations that wrapped the cycle along which the KK-reduction takes place.

Definition

Via fiber integration in ordinary differential cohomology

Let H\mathbf{H} be the smooth topos. For p+1p+1 \in \mathbb{N} write B p+1U(1) connH\mathbf{B}^{p+1}U(1)_{conn} \in \mathbf{H} for the universal moduli stack of circle n-bundles with connection (given by the Deligne complex).

Notice that fiber integration in ordinary differential cohomology has the following stacky incarnation (see here):

Proposition

For Σ\Sigma an oriented closed manifold of dimension kp+1k \leq p+1, then fiber integration in ordinary differential cohomology is reflected by a morphism of the form

[Σ,B p+1U(1) conn] Σ B p+1kU(1) conn [Σ,curv] curv [Σ,Ω p+2] Σ Ω p+2k, \array{ [\Sigma, \mathbf{B}^{p+1}U(1)_{conn}] &\stackrel{\int_\Sigma}{\longrightarrow}& \mathbf{B}^{p+1-k}U(1)_{conn} \\ \downarrow^{[\Sigma,curv]} && \downarrow^{curv} \\ [\Sigma,\mathbf{\Omega}^{p+2}] &\stackrel{\int_\Sigma}{\longrightarrow}& \mathbf{\Omega}^{p+2-k} } \,,

where the vertical morphisms are the curvature maps and the bottom morphisms reflects ordinary fiber integration of differential forms.

Definition

Given a cocycle

:X×ΣB p+1U(1) conn, \nabla \;\colon\; X \times \Sigma \longrightarrow \mathbf{B}^{p+1}U(1)_{conn} \,,

on the Cartesian product of some smooth space XX with Σ\Sigma, then its double dimensional reduction is the cocycle on XX which is given by the composite

X[Σ,X×Σ][Σ,][Σ,B p+1U(1) conn] ΣB p+1kU(1) conn, X \longrightarrow [\Sigma, X \times \Sigma] \stackrel{[\Sigma,\nabla]}{\longrightarrow} [\Sigma,\mathbf{B}^{p+1}U(1)_{conn}] \stackrel{\int_\Sigma}{\longrightarrow} \mathbf{B}^{p+1-k}U(1)_{conn} \,,

where the first morphism is the unit of the (Cartesian product \dashv internal hom)-adjunction.

Via cyclic loop spaces

We discuss here a formalization of double dimensional reduction via cyclification adjunction (FSS 16, section 3, BMSS 18, section 2.2). For more see at geometry of physics – fundamental super p-branes the section on double dimensional reduction.

Proposition

Let H\mathbf{H} be any (∞,1)-topos and let GG be an ∞-group in H\mathbf{H}. Then the right base change/dependent product along the canonical point inclusion *BG\ast \to \mathbf{B}G into the delooping of GG takes the following form: There is a pair of adjoint ∞-functors of the form

H[G,]/GhofibH /BG, \mathbf{H} \underoverset {\underset{[G,-]/G}{\longrightarrow}} {\overset{hofib}{\longleftarrow}} {\bot} \mathbf{H}_{/\mathbf{B}G} \,,

where

Hence for

then there is a natural equivalence

H(X^,A)originalfluxesoxidationreductionH /BG(X,[G,A]/G)doublydimensionally reducedfluxes \underset{ \text{original} \atop \text{fluxes} }{ \underbrace{ \mathbf{H}(\hat X\;,\; A) } } \;\; \underoverset {\underset{oxidation}{\longleftarrow}} {\overset{reduction}{\longrightarrow}} {\simeq} \;\; \underset{ \text{doubly} \atop { \text{dimensionally reduced} \atop \text{fluxes} } }{ \underbrace{ \mathbf{H}_{/\mathbf{B}G}(X \;,\; [G,A]/G) } }

given by

(X^A)(X [G,A]/G BG) \left( \hat X \longrightarrow A \right) \;\;\; \leftrightarrow \;\;\; \left( \array{ X && \longrightarrow && [G,A]/G \\ & \searrow && \swarrow \\ && \mathbf{B}G } \right)
Proof

First observe that the conjugation action on [G,X][G,X] is the internal hom in the (∞,1)-category of GG-∞-actions Act G(H)Act_G(\mathbf{H}). Under the equivalence of (∞,1)-categories

Act G(H)H /BG Act_G(\mathbf{H}) \simeq \mathbf{H}_{/\mathbf{B}G}

(from NSS 12) then GG with its canonical ∞-action is (*BG)(\ast \to \mathbf{B}G) and XX with the trivial action is (X×BGBG)(X \times \mathbf{B}G \to \mathbf{B}G).

Hence

[G,X]/G[*,X×BG] BGH /BG. [G,X]/G \simeq [\ast, X \times \mathbf{B}G]_{\mathbf{B}G} \;\;\;\;\; \in \mathbf{H}_{/\mathbf{B}G} \,.

Actually, this is the very definition of what [G,X]/GH /BG[G,X]/G \in \mathbf{H}_{/\mathbf{B}G} is to mean in the first place, abstractly.

But now since the slice (∞,1)-topos H /BG\mathbf{H}_{/\mathbf{B}G} is itself cartesian closed, via

E× BG()[E,] BG E \times_{\mathbf{B}G}(-) \;\;\; \dashv \;\;\; [E,-]_{\mathbf{B}G}

it is immediate that there is the following sequence of natural equivalences

H /BG(Y,[G,X]/G) H /BG(Y,[*,X×BG] BG) H /BG(Y× BG*,X×BGp *X) H(p !(Y× BG*)hofib(Y),X) H(hofib(Y),X) \begin{aligned} \mathbf{H}_{/\mathbf{B}G}(Y, [G,X]/G) & \simeq \mathbf{H}_{/\mathbf{B}G}(Y, [\ast, X \times \mathbf{B}G]_{\mathbf{B}G}) \\ & \simeq \mathbf{H}_{/\mathbf{B}G}( Y \times_{\mathbf{B}G} \ast, \underset{p^\ast X}{\underbrace{X \times \mathbf{B}G }} ) \\ & \simeq \mathbf{H}( \underset{hofib(Y)}{\underbrace{p_!(Y \times_{\mathbf{B}G} \ast)}}, X ) \\ & \simeq \mathbf{H}(hofib(Y),X) \end{aligned}

Here p:BG*p \colon \mathbf{B}G \to \ast denotes the terminal morphism and p !p *p_! \dashv p^\ast denotes the base change along it.

Examples

Reduction on the circle

Example

When Σ=S 1\Sigma = S^1 is the circle, and we think of X×S 1X \times S^1 as a spacetime of 11-dimensional supergravity, then :X×S 1B 3U(1) conn\nabla \colon X \times S^1 \to \mathbf{B}^3 U(1)_{conn} may represent the supergravity C-field as a cocycle in ordinary differential cohomology. Then its double dimensional reduction in the sense of def. is the differential cocycle representing the B-field on XX, in the sense of string theory.

Remark

For Σ=S 1\Sigma = S^1 a circle as in example , then the morphism X[Σ,X×Σ]X \longrightarrow [\Sigma, X \times \Sigma] in def. sends each point of XX to the loop in X×S 1X\times S^1 that winds identically around the copy of S 1S^1 at that point. Hence in this case it would make sense to consider, more generally, for each pp \in \mathbb{Z} the “order pp” double dimensional reduction, given by the operation where one instead considers the map that lets the loop wind pp times around the S 1S^1.

The resulting double dimensional reduction is just pp-times the original one, so in a sense nothing much is changed, but maybe it is suggestive that now we are looking at the space of C pC_p-fixed points of the free loop space (for C pC_p the cyclic group of order pp). In E-infinity geometry this fixed-point structure on the free loop spaces makes the derived function algebras – the topological Hochschild homology of the original function algebras – be cyclotomic spectra.

For general super pp-branes

Double dimensional reduction for the super-pp-branes in DD dimensions which are described by the Green-Schwarz action functional corresponds to moving down and left the diagonals in the brane scan table of consistent such branes:

The brane scan

In particular

From M-branes to F-branes

from M-branes to F-branes: superstrings, D-branes and NS5-branes

M-theory on S A 1×S B 1S^1_A \times S^1_B-elliptic fibrationKK-compactification on S A 1S^1_Atype IIA string theoryT-dual KK-compactification on S B 1S^1_Btype IIB string theorygeometrize the axio-dilatonF-theory on elliptically fibered-K3 fibrationduality between F-theory and heterotic string theoryheterotic string theory on elliptic fibration
M2-brane wrapping S A 1S_A^1double dimensional reduction \mapstotype IIA superstring\mapstotype IIB superstring\mapsto\mapstoheterotic superstring
M2-brane wrapping S B 1S_B^1\mapstoD2-brane\mapstoD1-brane\mapsto
M2-brane wrapping pp times around S A 1S_A^1 and qq times around S B 1S_B^1\mapstopp strings and qq D2-branes\mapsto(p,q)-string\mapsto
M5-brane wrapping S A 1S_A^1double dimensional reduction \mapstoD4-brane\mapstoD5-brane\mapsto
M5-brane wrapping S B 1S_B^1\mapstoNS5-brane\mapstoNS5-brane\mapsto\mapstoNS5-brane
M5-brane wrapping pp times around S A 1S_A^1 and qq times around S B 1S_B^1\mapstopp D4-brane and qq NS5-branes\mapsto(p,q)5-brane\mapsto
M5-brane wrapping S A 1×S B 1S_A^1 \times S_B^1\mapsto\mapstoD3-brane\mapsto
KK-monopole/A-type ADE singularity (degeneration locus of S A 1S^1_A-circle fibration, Sen limit of S A 1×S B 1S^1_A \times S^1_B elliptic fibration)\mapstoD6-brane\mapstoD7-branes\mapstoA-type nodal curve cycle degeneration locus of elliptic fibration ADE 2Cycle (Sen 97, section 2)SU-gauge enhancement
KK-monopole orientifold/D-type ADE singularity\mapstoD6-brane with O6-planes\mapstoD7-branes with O7-planes\mapstoD-type nodal curve cycle degeneration locus of elliptic fibration ADE 2Cycle (Sen 97, section 3)SO-gauge enhancement
exceptional ADE-singularity\mapsto\mapsto\mapstoexceptional ADE-singularity of elliptic fibration\mapstoE6-, E7-, E8-gauge enhancement

(e.g. Johnson 97, Blumenhagen 10)

References

General

Formalization of double dimensional reduction via cyclification of classifying spaces/characteristic L L_\infty -algebras:

in rational homotopy theory:

and in full homotopy theory:

Exposition is in

and further discussion in

The case of duality between 11D and 10D IIA supergravity:

Reduction of membrane to string

The concept of double dimensional reduction was introduced, for the case of the reduction of the supermembrane in 11d to the Green-Schwarz superstring in 10d, in

The above “brane scan” table showing the double dimensional reduction pattern of the super-pp-branes given by the Green-Schwarz action functional (see there for more references on this) is taken from

Reduction of M5-brane to D4-brane

The double dimensional reduction of the M5-brane to the D4-brane:

Reduction of black M2s and black M5s

The differential geometry of the double dimensional reduction of the M2-brane- and M5-brane-charges was maybe first clearly written out in:

For their black brane-reductions see:

Reduction of M-Waves and MK6s

Last revised on July 23, 2026 at 09:17:25. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.